Tomorrow's Non-Farm Payrolls Consensus of -175,000 Looks "Do-able"

Tomorrow the Bureau of Labor Statistics will be reporting its October non-farm payrolls number. The consensus of economists is for a job loss of only 175,000 which is an improvement over the prior month loss, but more importantly maintains a steady uptrend as shown in the chart below.



The BLS almost always revises the prior two months, in this case August and September. They tend to 'borrow' from good results and smooth out the trend, or at least they did under the Bush Administration. We will have to wait and see what happens.

The BLS will also have their Birth-Death Model at their backs helping to lift the number with a projected 100k imaginary jobs.



The BLS number will further have the wind at its back because this is a month which the actual number traditionally comes in high, and is seasonally adjusted lower for the 'headline number.'



The good news is that the 12 month moving average of jobs is starting to show a bottoming process IF this number comes in as expected.



We can be sure that the government is looking over these results, keenly. Lyndon Johnson famously pre-approved the number before its release, often sending it back for revision when he did not care for the implied headlines.

We cannot say if that practice still exists, or is handled by lower level functionaries on the Council of Economic Advisors. Who knows, it might even be a relatively honest number by Washington standards.

Watch the Birth Death model and the revisions to September and August in particular. If they 'borrow forward' from August this will be a sign of statistical manipulation in our minds at least.

We do have an open mind, and assume that an improvement in job losses is possible, even likely perhaps. If one throws several trillion dollars at a problem in a short timeframe some result is likely to be produced for it, although in this case it will not most likely last without some fundamental reforms and restructuring.

And it goes without saying that if the number misses by noticeable degree, with all this going for it, then any talk of even a short term recovery is placed on hold.

Governments lie, and people of privilege lie and cheat readily when their results do not match their expectations, on their taxes, in their relationships, in school, at work, all most of all to themselves.

Some of them 'bend the rules' so well that they can go through months without more than one or two losing days of trading in volatile markets, in defiance of all probability and the principle of a symmetrical dissemination of information.

NAV Premiums of Certain Precious Metal Funds and ETFs

Note: the way I use this information is not so much to compare the premiums with each other, although there are some relationships there and significant deviations are of interest. Each of them is different from the others. CEF and GTU are funds holding physical gold and/or silver, and the amounts of metal they hold varies infrequently in well advertised step-wise changes.

GLD and SLV are ETFs, somewhat artificial constructs, in which the amount of metal they hold varies considerably, and intends to track the relationship with spot prices on a somewhat fixed basis.

Rather it serves to compare with data on the premiums of the same fund or ETF over time. One would do this by using the subject category at the bottom of this post, or perhaps doing it for yourself. The premiums expand and contract, excepting GLD and SLV which are control stable, being largely a discount for a management fee. A significant deviation there would be possible evidence of shorting or a paired trade.

How Can You Tell When Gold Is In a Bubble?

When the junior miners start showing these kinds of returns, you might be in a bubble.

We're nowhere near that point yet.

Foreign Holdings of US Dollar Assets

Roughly analagous to Eurodollars, although it is not clear how much if any of the central bank reserves are actually captured here in these reports by BIS reporting commercial banks, especially in China and the non-European countries. Certainly the NY Fed Custodial Accounts for Foreign Central Banks show no decline whatsoever from the long term trend of accumulation to support their mercantilism and currency pegs.



But the takeway from this chart is that a long term trend of dollar accumulation was broken, and rather painfully, in the deflating of the Wall Street financial assets fraud.

One might not expect the Europeans and Asians to accept new financial instruments in dollars quite so readily. The US seems intent on maintaining a few mega-banks to serve as "competitive" instruments of national policy on the world financial stage.

They may find that maintaining the banks and their particular weapons of financial mass destruction may be just as costly as 700 military bases in diverse locations. Such are the burdens of empire.