I think their major concerns are that higher interest rates will kill the housing market and consumer demand, which are both in a weak recovery. And the potential of a debt limit showdown looms over the Fed without a doubt. Mortgage debt is important, but the sovereign debt is the entire game.
The capping of gold and silver this week was trader games and perception management, nothing more.
The fundamentals may not always prevail, but they matter in the longer term.
The Right Shoulders on the gold and silver charts look like they are now in, but we must break the resistance and then the neckline to confirm. Notice that the daily high on the short squeeze stopped right on it at big resistance of 1350 to 1360. I think the real test will come at the first neckline as the funds square up and get long. What we are seeing today is the trap, sprung.
The COMEX precious metals trade has hardly turned into an efficient and transparent market in one day. I suspect that physical offtake will force their hand, and probably from without, on a more physically oriented exchange that declares bids without offers at price, and then a market dislocation follows. It may occur in the forex markets, and that would be significant.
The COMEX may lead, but will more likely follow since it is, after all, a fiat exchange whose day has past, having diverged badly from the reality of world markets, unless it changes with the times.
Hey, do you think the biggest banks on Wall Street had any with the Fed about their decision today? Goldman just came out with another bear call on gold. But open interest to registered gold inventory suggested that these prices were already untenable and likely to break to the upside.
COT analysis suggests JPM had closed their gold shorts and went net long in the last couple of weeks. ROFLMAO
Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in July suggests that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace. Some indicators of labor market conditions have shown further improvement in recent months, but the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending and business fixed investment advanced, and the housing sector has been strengthening, but mortgage rates have risen further and fiscal policy is restraining economic growth. Apart from fluctuations due to changes in energy prices, inflation has been running below the Committee’s longer-run objective, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic growth will pick up from its recent pace and the unemployment rate will gradually decline toward levels the Committee judges consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee sees the downside risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished, on net, since last fall, but the tightening of financial conditions observed in recent months, if sustained, could slow the pace of improvement in the economy and labor market. The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective could pose risks to economic performance, but it anticipates that inflation will move back toward its objective over the medium term.
The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments in coming months and will continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has improved substantially in a context of price stability. In judging when to moderate the pace of asset purchases, the Committee will, at its coming meetings, assess whether incoming information continues to support the Committee’s expectation of ongoing improvement in labor market conditions and inflation moving back toward its longer-run objective. Asset purchases are not on a preset course, and the Committee’s decisions about their pace will remain contingent on the Committee’s economic outlook as well as its assessment of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases.
To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the Committee today reaffirmed its view that a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends and the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that this exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the Committee will also consider other information, including additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. When the Committee decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, it will take a balanced approach consistent with its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Charles L. Evans; Jerome H. Powell; Eric S. Rosengren; Jeremy C. Stein; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the action was Esther L. George, who was concerned that the continued high level of monetary accommodation increased the risks of future economic and financial imbalances and, over time, could cause an increase in long-term inflation expectations.
Play it again Sam, play it for old time's sake.