Considering the AMB and the narrow money figures went parabolic, with the greatest increase in Fed history, these are somewhat unusual words from a Fed official.
Best to take him at his word. He is only saying the truth about what the Fed is already doing. This sounds like a classic misdirection.
Let's guess. In order to save us he Fed should give more money to the big money center banks through Fed programs? The Fed should buy bad assets at par from unconventional parties like every large corporation with bad debts? The Fed should more aggressively debase the currency and to transfers the wealth of savers of to those who caused this crisis?
This ought to be fun to watch.
Bloomberg
Fed Should Expand Supply of Money, Bullard Says
By Scott Lanman and Anthony Massucci
Feb. 17 (Bloomberg) - Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said the U.S. faces a risk of “sustained deflation” and called on the central bank to avert a decline in prices by expanding the money supply.
The prospect of deflation is a “significant downside risk” and may increase home foreclosures, Bullard said in a speech today in New York. Adopting a target “rapid” growth rate for the monetary base, which includes money in circulation and banks’ reserve deposits with the Fed, should “head off any incipient deflationary threat,” he said.
Bullard is one of a few Fed officials to advocate a new policy tool after the Federal Open Market Committee in December cut its main interest rate almost to zero. The central bank is using money-creation authority to put assets such as home loans on its balance sheet, aiming to unfreeze credit and end the longest recession since 1982.
“By expanding the monetary base at an appropriate rate, the FOMC can signal that it intends to avoid the risk of further deflation and the possibility of a deflation trap,” Bullard said in prepared remarks to the New York Association for Business Economics.
He didn’t propose a specific figure for the target.
The FOMC said in its Jan. 28 statement that there’s “some risk that inflation could persist for a time below rates that best foster economic growth and price stability in the longer term.”
Growth Target
The FOMC at its December meeting discussed setting a target for growth in measures of money, such as the monetary base. While a “few” policy makers favored a numerical goal for money growth, most preferred a more open-ended “close cooperation and consultation” with the Fed board on how to expand assets and liabilities, according to minutes of the session.
Bullard’s warning about deflation is stronger than comments by other central bank officials. Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said Feb. 11 that he’s “not tremendously concerned about deflation.”
Bullard told reporters after the speech he supports the adoption of an inflation target to prevent expectations for prices from falling too far. A target for inflation “would be helpful at this time,” he said.
“You have to consult with all players, including Congress,” he said. “If they don’t want to do it, then we don’t do it.”
“Thus, it should be understood that when pro-US figures use the term, 'rules-based international order,' they are not referring to anything analogous to the rule of law. Quite the opposite, they are using Orwellian language to describe a system in which essentially no rules can be established and/or observed, given that the dominant state has the prerogative to violate and/or rewrite “rules” at its whim.” Aaron Good, American Exception
