The Next Wave of the Financial Crisis Is Coming (And Why)

These excerpts from the most recent TARP Congressional Oversight Panel Report make the risks in the US financial system abundantly clear.

Do you think that the Congress has the will and the ability to act on their recommendation, with the men currently in positions of power on the key Committees? Do you believe that the Obama Administration is capable of reforming itself and effecting genuine change with so many Wall Street denizens forming their policy?

"In order to advance a full recovery in the economy, there must be greater transparency, accountability, and clarity, from both the government and banks, about the scope of the troubled asset problem."

We are persuaded that the government is waiting for the next wave of failures, or some exogenous event of catastrophic proportion, to provide their rationale to take new aggressive action.

But while the financial oligarchy is in control of the men in power, we doubt that these will be the right steps for the majority of Americans, the US economy, and its debt holders.

"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to the one who is striking at the root."
Henry David Thoreau

Congressional Oversight Panel - August 11 Report - The Continued Risk of Troubled Assets

"...But, it is likely that an overwhelming portion of the troubled assets from last October remain on bank balance sheets today.

If the troubled assets held by banks prove to be worth less than their balance sheets currently indicate, the banks may be required to raise more capital. If the losses are severe enough, some financial institutions may be forced to cease operations. This means that the future performance of the economy and the performance of the underlying loans, as well as the method of valuation of the assets, are critical to the continued operation of the banks.

...If the economy worsens, especially if unemployment remains elevated or if the commercial real estate market collapses, then defaults will rise and the troubled assets will continue to deteriorate in value. Banks will incur further losses on their troubled assets. The financial system will remain vulnerable to the crisis conditions that TARP was meant to fix.

...Part of the financial crisis was triggered by uncertainty about the value of banks' loan and securities portfolios. Changing accounting standards helped the banks temporarily by allowing them greater leeway in describing their assets, but it did not change the underlying problem. In order to advance a full recovery in the economy, there must be greater transparency, accountability, and clarity, from both the government and banks, about the scope of the troubled asset problem. Treasury and relevant government agencies should work together to move financial institutions toward sufficient disclosure of the terms and volume of troubled assets on institutions‟ books so that markets can function more effectively. Finally, as noted above, Treasury must keep in mind the particular challenges facing small banks.

This crisis was years in the making, and it won‟t be resolved overnight. But we are now ten months into TARP, and troubled assets remain a substantial danger to the
financial system.

...Nonetheless, financial stability remains at risk if the underlying problem of troubled assets remains unresolved."

The banks must be restrained, and the financial system reformed, and the economy brought back into balance, before there can be any sustained recovery.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

The Banks Must Be Restrained and the Financial System Reformed...

As Simon Johnson points out in his essay previously cited here, the reform required to support a sustainable recovery will not happen while the financial oligarchs control the government, the media, and the banks. Ken Rogoff reaches the brink of a similar conclusion.

The lengths and ways to which Americans go to avoid their reality grows increasingly surreal. Most economists and thought leaders prefer to lose themselves in non-controversial details, traditional team politics, and of course the spinning of propaganda in support of their patrons or prospective employers in the think tanks, institutes, and corporate enclaves.

In a way who can blame them? I am finding it increasingly difficult to watch financial television these days, because the speakers are so cruelly deformed, devoid of humanity, pale figures washed in the strident din and flickering torches of a concrete stadium hosting a desperate rally as the night closes in.

Truth is becoming such an increasingly scarce commodity in 'the fog of numbers,' so that one might think that a war is fast approaching.

And so it is, that events may unfold as they have done so many times before. As the ancient maps would say as they marked the boundary of the unknown, "Here there be monsters."

In 1940 the American essayist and poet Archibald Macleish wrote a book titled "The Irresponsibles."

Indeed.

Project Syndicate
The Confidence Game
by Kenneth Rogoff

CAMBRIDGE – Next month marks the one year anniversary of the collapse of the venerable American investment bank, Lehman Brothers. The fall of Lehman marked the onset of a global recession and financial crisis the likes of which the world has not seen since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. After one year, trillions of dollars in public monies, and much soul searching in the world’s policy community, have we learned the right lessons? I fear not.

The overwhelming consensus in the policy community is that if only the government had bailed out Lehman, the whole thing would have been a hiccup and not a heart attack. Famous investors and leading policymakers alike have opined that in our ultra-interconnected global economy, a big financial institution like Lehman can never be allowed to fail. No matter how badly it mismanages its business – Lehman essentially transformed itself into a real estate holding company totally dependent on a continuing US housing bubble – the creditors of a big financial institution should always get repaid. Otherwise, confidence in the system will be undermined, and chaos will break loose.

Having reached the epiphany that financial restructuring must be avoided at all costs, the governments of the world have in turn cast a huge safety net over banks (and whole countries in Eastern Europe), woven from taxpayer dollars.

Unfortunately, the conventional post-mortem on Lehman is wishful thinking. It basically says that no matter how huge the housing bubble, how deep a credit hole the United States (and many other countries) had dug, and how convoluted the global financial system, we could have just grown our way out of trouble. Patch up Lehman, move on, keep drafting off of China’s energy, and nothing bad ever need have happened.

The fact is global imbalances in debt and asset prices had been building up to a crescendo for years, and had reached the point where there was no easy way out. The United States was showing all the warning signs of a deep financial crisis long in advance of Lehman, as Carmen Reinhart and I document in our forthcoming book This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly .

Housing prices had doubled in a short period, spurring American consumers to drop any thought of saving money. Policymakers, including the US Federal Reserve, had simply let the 2000s growth party go on for too long. Drunk with profits, the banking and insurance industry had leveraged itself to the sky. Investment banks had transformed their business in ways their managers and boards clearly did not understand. (And willfully so he should add - Jesse)

It was not just Lehman Brothers. The entire financial system was totally unprepared to deal with the inevitable collapse of the housing and credit bubbles. The system had reached a point where it had to be bailed out and restructured. And there is no realistic political or legal scenario where such a bailout could have been executed without some blood on the streets. Hence, the fall of a large bank or investment bank was inevitable as a catalyst to action.

The problem with letting Lehman go under was not the concept but the execution. The government should have moved in aggressively to cushion the workout of Lehman’s complex derivative book, even if this meant creative legal interpretations or pushing through new laws governing the financial system. Admittedly, it is hard to do these things overnight, but there was plenty of warning. The six months prior to Lehman saw a slow freezing up of global credit and incipient recessions in the US and Europe. Yet little was done to prepare. (Why was nothing done? Why is nothing being done even today to prepare for the next wave of defaults one might ask? - Jesse)

So what is the game plan now? There is talk of regulating the financial sector, but governments are afraid to shake confidence. There is recognition that the housing bubble collapse has to be absorbed, but no stomach for acknowledging the years of slow growth in consumption that this will imply.

There is acknowledgement that the US China trade relationship needs to be rebalanced, but little imagination on how to proceed. Deep down, our leaders and policymakers have convinced themselves that for all its flaws, the old system was better than anything we are going to think of, and that simply restoring confidence will fix everything, at least for as long as they remain in office.

The right lesson from Lehman should be that the global financial system needs major changes in regulation and governance. The current safety net approach may work in the short term but will ultimately lead to ballooning and unsustainable government debts, particularly in the US and Europe.

Asia may be willing to sponsor the west for now, but not in perpetuity. Eventually Asia will find alternatives in part by deepening its own debt markets. Within a few years, western governments will have to sharply raise taxes, inflate, partially default, or some combination of all three. As painful as it may seem, it would be far better to start bringing fundamentals in line now. Restoring confidence has been helpful and important. But ultimately we need a system of global financial regulation and governance that merits our faith.

The China Bubble and the Convergence of Oligarchies

This is an interesting story from a source that we will be consulting regularly for their news items and insightful analysis.

Regular readers of this blog will notice that we strike the same recurrent themes.

Some years ago Mr. Bill Gates traveled to China, and liked what he saw. This was the model of capitalism which he favored: a small but powerful elite centrally planning an economy peopled by semi-feudal serfs, and living large on the backs of the many.

With all deference to Jimmy Rogers, China is a bubble. The central government will grow increasingly repressive and manipulative as the people improve in education, health and material means. Propaganda will grow more sophisticated and remain as pervasive as it is today.

When the bubble bursts, the iron fist will be unveiled and there will be popular uprisings, and those who believe they are in elite positions now may then find themselves on the docks piled on their baggage waiting for the next ship to take them to safer destinations.

This is certainly nothing new. After the collapse of the first Federal Reserve credit bubble in the late 1920's, the West turned to Soviet Russia and the fascist countries of Italy and Germany for the answer to the 'failure' of Western free market capitalism. Hitler and Mussolini were heavily favored by Wall Street, having a firm hand to rein in the mob.

On the optimistic side, freedom wanes, but still and in remarkable ways, never seems to die.

The Daily Bell
Chinese bank announces bombshell
Issue 343 • Friday, July 10, 2009

Yesterday on their website, the People's Bank of China announced a shocker. New Chinese bank lending for June was 1.53 trillion yuan ($224 billion), double the lending in May. The total already for the year is an astounding 7.4 trillion yuan when the target for the entire year was 5 trillion.

Putting this in context, total lending this year so far has amounted to 25% of 2008 GDP. As I wrote earlier this week, Chinese regulators are getting concerned that this lending is going towards poor credit and bleeding into commodity market speculation.

As most know, bank lending is high powered monetary stimulus due to its high velocity. This is the key difference between fiscal stimulus vs. monetary stimulus. Actually, monetary stimulus will only work well if the banks receiving the funds lend them out. In the US, this is clearly not happening due to banks loan losses and caution over new lending (expanding balance sheet.) In China, this is not the case and new loans are flowing. - CNBC

Dominant Social Theme: China is heating up.

Free-Market Analysis: We've written about this before. China backed into "capitalism" about 30 years ago and the impetus for where it is now was increased by the problems with Tiananmen Square. The Chinese leaders are not interested in political theory at this point (if they ever were). Their currency is power and the way to maintain power is to create an apolitical system where citizens "can grow rich." Western systems work a good deal better than communist systems in this regard. And thus China has built a facade of a Western system.

Yes, it is really only an imitation of a Western system (from a political and big business perspective anyway) in our opinion, just as its banks are only imitations of Western banks and its stock markets are only imitations as well. In fact, to grow rich by investing in the Chinese stock market one apparently simply has to listen intently to the noises coming from the government as to what companies will grow and what companies will not. (And this is different from the US now in what way? - Jesse)

As far as the banks go, the system is probably even more basic than in the West. The central bank prints as much money as it can, and the commercial banks disseminate it. These banks may act as independent entities, but they still have a foot in state government as do many large companies in China.

It is all fairly well jury rigged. China has incorporated a façade of Westernism but to cast China as the world's financial engine is to understand how desperate the West has become. China's economy grows by 10 and 15 percent a year, and now appears be heating up even more. This is not normal growth but central banking generated growth. The same clique still runs China, but the economy has been supercharged by additional printing.

China is said to be turning inward now, as Western countries cannot afford to buy its products. But whether China will be able to maintain its growth by using its own huge population as a purchasing pool remains to be seen. What will certainly happen sooner or later is that the supercharged money being used by the Chinese will create the same boom-bust cycle as has happened elsewhere. Only when it ends in China after so many years, it will be the mother-of-all blow-offs.

Conclusion: It is difficult to see what Chinese leaders expect to happen once the bubble busts. Maybe they are gambling that they can control the unrest that will come in its wake. Maybe they assume the bubble will not bust for many years. (And this is different from the US now in what way? - Jesse)

But articles like the one excerpted above show us that sooner or later China's overheated and pseudo-Western economy will implode, and likely even more violently than Western economies ever have. And here's a thought: The Chinese in the meantime are said to be big buyers of gold on a government level and also personally. Perhaps what is going to eventually happen is better known in China than the West.