JP Morgan's Commodities Trading Head Blythe Masters to Troops: "Don't Panic"

Note to Blythe Masters: Sorry to hear about your losses in the coal market because of a 'rookie error' in taking on overlarge positions. But an epic short squeeze is coming for your massive and untenable positions in silver and gold, and hell is coming with it.

And the vampire squid and its minions are going to wrap themselves around your neck, and inexorably suck the life from you, while the hedge funds lick your wounds. Your protectors in the government will not even return your calls, because they will be running for their own lives away from the disaster that you created, denying all knowledge of it, any of it.

And then, by all means, you may panic.

Bloomberg
JPMorgan's Masters Urges No `Panic' as Commodities Unit Slips
By Dawn Kopecki
Aug 03 2010

Blythe Masters, JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s head of commodities, sought to reassure her team on an internal conference call after “extremely difficult” dismissals, defections and a first half in which some results were as much as 20 percent below expectations.

“Don’t panic,” she said in summing up the 35-minute call, a recording of which was obtained by Bloomberg News. “No one’s going to get screwed. We’re not going to do crazy things on compensation at the end of the year.”

Masters, who was named to run the business in late 2006, said the bank began dismissals on July 21, a day before the call, to trim overlap after buying parts of RBS Sempra Commodities LLP. The bank cut less than 10 percent of the combined front office, even as the oil unit lost “key people” who needed to be replaced, she said. She was discussing results with top executives after “we made a bit of a rookie error” that left the firm “vulnerable to a squeeze,” she said.

The 41-year-old banker, who helped develop credit-default swaps while at JPMorgan in the 1990s (kharma, ain't it a bitch - Jesse), delivered her talk from a conference room in New York, where the bank is based, less than a month after the firm closed its $1.7 billion RBS Sempra purchase. The deal almost doubled the number of corporate clients the bank can serve for commodities, Jes Staley, Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan’s investment bank, said in February....

...“You should think of this [the layoffs] as business as usual and definitely not a reaction to losses in coal, or anything like that,” she said. “It’s not because we are panicking. It is not because we are changing our minds, backing off, backing out, backing down, running away, none of the above.” (When an executive has to say this, they are indeed panicking, and ass-covering at the highest levels is already underway - Jesse)

Masters said had she spent the previous several days in meetings with Staley, Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon and the investment bank’s operating committee and was preparing a “deep dive” with JPMorgan’s board and Chief Financial Officer Doug Braunstein. (When the perfect metals storm hits their derivatives positions, Jamie is going to be throwing up in his wastebasket, and JPM's stock price is going to be doing a deep dive of its own as people realize that they are Lehman writ large. - Jesse)

“When you have a bad quarter or a bad year, you should expect to spend a lot of time with senior management explaining yourself,” she said. (ROFLMAO - Jesse) “I have worked very hard, number 1, to own responsibility for what went on and to acknowledge it and not excuse it. We made an error of judgment. Frankly, we made a bit of a rookie error. We got overexposed in the market and made ourselves vulnerable to a squeeze. (Their position losses in coal compared to their risk exposure in silver is like a broken pipe in the wall compared to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami - Jesse)

‘‘But if you take that out and recognize that we’re not going to allow that to happen to ourselves again, the rest of the story really ain’t that bad,” she said. “In fact, if you look through it all, it’s extraordinarily encouraging.” (The 12 steps start with Step One - overcoming denial - Jesse)

Coal derivatives trader Chan Bhima made an error of judgment, not of character, (lol, this sounds like Michael Scott excusing Dwight's fire drill fiasco at Dunder Mifflin - Jesse) in “taking a risk on our behalf,” she said. Coal prices plunged 24 percent from January through March and then surged 35 percent through June. Marchiony, the bank spokesman, said Bhima wasn’t available for comment.

The company took an oversized position both relative to their fledgling operation and relative to the market, Masters said. The error cost the company as much as $250 million, the New York Post reported June 8, without saying where it got the information...

In the meanwhile here is some light reading while you consider you options with those oversized short positions China Seeks To Widen Gold Market

Kinross Gold to Buy Red Back Mining for $7.1 Billion, a 17% Premium, Or Was It?

Consolidation and acquisitions of smaller exploring companies by more mature companies with strong cash flows will be a dominant trend in the precious metals industry for the next ten years at least.

The long bear market in gold and silver has left mining companies ill-equipped to meet the growing demand for the metal by industry and investors. The majors will have to buy ready supply from the mid caps and juniors with proven resources, but a shortage of capital to successfully extract it and bring it to market.

There are a number of mining companies sitting on very attractive proven reserves, with market caps that scarcely reflect what they are known to have in the ground. If the stock market remains inefficient, for whatever reason, the acquisition activity will rise to fill that void.

I would also expect more of the junior to enact 'shareholder rights' plans to prevent predatory takeover offers, given the penchant to naked shorting and the sport which the funds have with these thinly traded small cap stocks on the Canadian exchanges. There are many junior mining companies that are not worthwhile investments or acquisitions. It takes due diligence to discover the value, take a position, and wait for price and that value to converge.

None of the stories I have seen so far discuss the price per ounce of proven reserves that Kinross paid for Red Back, which is a key metric. Also, the "17% premium" over market paid for the stock at 29.80 per share is really nil because this is the market price of just a few weeks ago before this artificial smackdown in the price of gold and silver, and the miners. Still, the stock had an amazing ramp higher over the past year. Management seems to be well taken care of in this acquisition. I should like to see more data about price per proven reserves and also prospective reserves to see if shareholders were taken care of as well.

And I should caution you that hedge fund managers, analysts and major companies are notorious for 'talking their book' when stalking their prey, so as to not drive up the price while they are accumulating their positions. Often managers are talking down the sector, and even the market most often through 'professional intermediaries,' while they are privately buying their initial stakes in target companies. That is how this game is played.

Their are a lot of restless dollar reserves around the world parked in dollar bonds paying negative returns looking for hard asset investments. China Plans to Help Bullion Producers Expand Overseas

"China “will place heavy emphasis on supporting large-scale gold producers in their development and overseas expansion plans,” the central bank said in the statement."

There seems to be a new gold and silver rush just beginning, and it could become quite impressive once it gains momentum.

Bloomberg
Kinross Gold to Buy Red Back Mining for $7.1 Billion
By Laura Marcinek and Rebecca Keenan
Aug 2, 2010 7:32 PM

Kinross Gold Corp., Canada’s third- largest producer of the metal, said it agreed to buy the shares of Red Back Mining Inc. it doesn’t already own for about $7.1 billion to add mines in West Africa.

Red Back investors will get 1.778 Kinross common shares and 0.11 of a Kinross common share purchase warrant for each Red Back common share held, the companies said today in a statement. The value of the offer is C$30.50 ($29.80) a Red Back common share, they said, which represents a premium of about 17 percent over Red Back’s July 30 closing share price in Toronto. The city’s stock exchange is closed today for a public holiday.

The volume of gold-mining mergers and acquisitions is increasing as producers are discovering less metal while the bullion price has advanced each year since 2000. Gold-mining companies have been involved in about $32 billion of deals this year, compared with about $4.8 billion a year earlier, according to data compiled by Bloomberg...

Gold discovery rates have been dropping by 4 million ounces a year for the past three decades, Credit Suisse Group AG’s Michael Slifirski said in November, citing a presentation from Gold Fields Ltd. The price of the metal has increased 7.8 percent in London this year. Gold traded at a record $1,265.30 an ounce on June 21.

Red Back, based in Vancouver, operates the Tasiast mine in Mauritania and the Chirano mine in Ghana, and has exploration projects in both countries.

“It is a fashionable part of the gold world at the moment,” Craighead said. “Kinross is probably chasing Red Back specifically for its growth attributes.”

Marché de l'Or: Gold Daily Charts from Pierre and Jesse

Mon ami Pierre dit:

La correction mineure de l'or que nous attendions semble terminée et le support vers 1.157 USD l'once ne devrait pas être cassé à la baisse.

Nous avons donc repris pour nos clients des positions à la hausse sur l'or pour la moitie de notre capacité d'achat.

Que nous augmenterions pour le cas où l'or baisserait néanmoins vers 1.146 (moyenne mobile à 200 jours).

Une cassure à la hausse de la résistance vers 1.211 (moyenne mobile à 50 jours) propulserait l'or vers 1.340 d'ici fin 2010.

Cordialement. Pierre Leconte

The correction is probably now over with the low set at 1,157 and a position has been taken. He will increase this position if gold continues its correction down to the 200 DMA at 1,146.

Gold will go higher to challenge the important overhead resistance at the 50 DMA of 1,211 and if it breaks out he thinks this will set up its rally to a year end high of 1,340.

Gold Daily Chart: Le Café Américain



I am pleased that we both agree from different perspectives. There is a great deal of resistance to gold now in the New York and London markets, so the way higher will likely not be easy unless something happens. I think silver may break out first and lead gold higher but this I cannot say for sure. But a break in the silver cartel would certainly do the trick.

One difference from a technical perspective is that if the price of gold falls to the 200 DMA at 1146 and can 'stick it' (not intraday) this will violate the lower bound of the handle, and I will have to then look at the more boring chart formation of an inverse head and shoulders formation that has completed at the high, and is now retracing the rally.

And this from Richard Russell

"Now I want to reveal my latest thoughts, which have finally come together. The US has a national debt of $13 trillion (that's trillion, not billion). There's no way in God's name that the US can ever pay off that debt. Actually, if the US does nothing the interest on the debt will eat up the nation. Worse, aside from the national debt the US has over $50 trillion in unfunded liabilities.

To put it frankly, the US is facing a debt future that can not be solved by cutting back on expenses and raising taxes. Even if the US taxed away all the income and profits of individuals and all corporate profits, the government would still not be able pay off its debts.

In my opinion, the US MUST default on its debt. There are two ways to default. One is simply to renege on the debt. I don't think the US would ever do that. If the US did that, nobody would ever deal with the US again. The other way to default on the debt is to inflate it away. I'm absolutely convinced that this is the path that the US will take. If the US inflates enough, then over time (many years) the devalued dollar will tend of reduce the power of the debts…

Lastly, what about gold? Gold formed a head-and-shoulders pattern. The pattern broke down, and August gold sank to 1156. But there gold held. It was if a net closed under gold. The plunge scared many of the late gold-buyers out of the market. Since its July 27 low, gold has been quietly creeping higher.

My guess is that gold has bottomed. Too many investors and too many central banks are potential buyers of gold. And they are 'bottom-fishing."

As far as I'm concerned, the "word" is out. The US will default on its monster debts. The US will default via systematic inflation. This will gradually "kill" the dollar. The protection against declining purchasing power of the dollar (brought on by Fed inflation) is gold.

As this is recognized by the masses, gold will move higher. Ultimately, this will develop into the speculative third phase of the gold bull market. The Russell opinion -- this is the time for gold accumulation and patience, a lot of patience.

Question -- Russell, I see a few of the smartest hedge fund managers (Soros, John Paulsen) have been buying heavily into gold mining shares. So, gold bullion or gold mining shares, which should we buy?

Answer -- The fund managers don't want a "safe-haven" position in gold -- they want potential profits. I believe the fund managers who are stocking up on gold mining shares are thinking that a speculative third phase in gold lies somewhere ahead. They're thinking that if gold explodes on the upside, the gold mining shares will go nuts. The shares will go crazy because they have the leverage. It will not cost them any more to mine gold even if the price of gold advances (yes, but union labor may cost more, and there will be the problem of higher taxes.

So I'll admit it -- if gold goes nuts on the upside, fortunes will be made by those holding gold shares. But I still prefer the actual product -- bullion gold. It's a cleaner play, no worries about a mine running out of reserves, no worries about union wage-boosts, no worries about political back-lash or confiscation, just fewer worries. And I avoid worries whenever I can.

To wind it up, I don't care for the stock market's action, but I do like gold's action. Gold and cash, that's where I want to be. And I'd be happy if my subscribers would copy my position."