03 February 2009

Life Insurance Companies Braced for Heavy Losses


The easy times, the extended bull market in equities and corporate profits, with a disinflation and an easy money policy, created a lot of very wealthy people who managed other people's money by riding the incoming tide of the Greenspan era and a willingness to use the world's reserve currency to run up incredible levels of debt.

The disparity of wealth in the US from the wealthiest few to the less fortunate many has never been greater since the start of the Great Depression. And if history repeats there will be a tremendous effort to make the public pay for most of it.

Privatize the gains, but socialize the losses. Having the public bad bank buy the bad assets of the big money center banks and financial ponzi schemes and take all the losses is a thinly disguised act of theft and injustice on an almost incomprehensible scale.

There will be no lending until we drive the bad assets out of the insolvent banks. And the way to do this is to restructure the banks and write off their bad debts, and apportion the losses to the shareholders and credit holders, while backing the individual depositors and guaranteed pension funds one hundred percent.

We cannot continue to subsidize a few big money center banks from their losses, and call anything in our government a republican democracy of the people, by the people, and for the people.

"Nationalization" does not mean that the government will run the banks. Nationalization means that a body like the FDIC will take an insolvent bank, liquidate its assets, arrange for the payment of creditors, and either sell the assets to other banks, or allow a solvent bank to emerge from the process. This is what the FDIC does with any bank that fails, that is not a a powerful manipulator of the political process.

A 'bad bank' or a guarantee of private banking assets by the government is the subsidy of private losses by public money. It is a continuance of a fraud.

We either have a free market, with both gain or loss, or we have a managed economy where the Federal Reserve Bankers and ex-bankers decide who succeeds and who fails, who gains and who loses, who commands and who serves.

No matter who pays for it, the party is over.

Bloomberg
Insurers’ Corporate-Bond Losses May Exceed Subprime

By Andrew Frye

Feb. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Corporate debt defaults may cost U.S. life insurers “substantially” more than losses on securities linked to subprime, Alt-A and commercial mortgages, said Eric Berg, an analyst at Barclays Plc.

Corporate defaults are poised for a “significant” increase this year as the recession deepens, Berg, based in New York, said in a research note yesterday. The American Council of Life Insurers estimated the industry, led by MetLife Inc. and Prudential Financial Inc., holds $1 trillion in corporate debt.

None of the life insurers we studied appear to be doing a particularly good job” of picking bonds backed by companies, Berg said. “Understandably, investors are concerned.”

Life insurers have plummeted in the last year in New York trading as investment losses and guarantees on slumping retirement products sap capital. Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. leads the industry with $7.9 billion in writedowns and unrealized losses tied to the real estate market since 2007, while New York-based MetLife has accumulated $7.2 billion, according to Bloomberg data.

Hartford and Prudential have cut jobs, asked regulators to ease reserve standards and applied for aid from the government’s $700 billion rescue program to replenish funds after reporting net losses in the third quarter. MetLife sold $2.3 billion of stock in October to bolster finances. The Standard & Poor’s Supercomposite Life & Health Insurance Index has declined about 60 percent in the last 12 months...


New Hampshire Throwing Down the Gauntlet to the Federal Government


Here is a copy of House Resolution 6 being discussed by the New Hampshire Legislature.

It certainly sets some limitations on the Presidency and the Congress.

New Hampshire HCR 6

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles...

...That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government...



02 February 2009

Inflation v. Deflation and the Yield Curve: Jesse's Lifetime Trading Plan


More on the inflation v. deflation debate. There is a divergence among the pros as you can see from this article in Bloomberg which is worth reading.

Our 'model' is deflation now, at least in prices, with a nasty inflation of probably double digits at least to follow.

There is little advantage in trying to anticipate the progression of these events unless you are looking at the slow accumulation of precious metals and key investments with very long time horizons. Timing will be difficult until things become obvious, which leaves sufficient time to move among relatively liquid assets.

The Fed will be slow to drain, and it is not unlikely that we could see short term rates spike up to 15 to 20 percent with much of the longer yield curve at 12+%. The Fed will feel the need to crush a burgeoning inflationary cycle, especially if there are any exogenous shocks in key commodities.

That will set up a once-more-in-our-lifetime buying opportunity in zero coupons and annuitiies, and very high quality dividend paying utilities with DRIPS. We made that play in the early 1980's and it was a long term winner.

You now have our investment gameplan for what is likely to be the rest of Jesse's life. Let's see how it plays out and allow the market to inform us of the timing, and surprise twists. We see little advantage in anticipating these markets and the preservation of capital is paramount.


Bloomberg
Treasury Real Yield at 16-Month High on Inflation Bet
By Dakin Campbell

Feb. 2 (Bloomberg) -- For the first time since 2007, Treasury investors are betting that inflation will accelerate.

The yield on 10-year notes exceeds the consumer price index by 2.72 percentage points, the most since December 2006. The gap between two- and 10-year rates widened at the fastest pace in a year last month as traders demanded more compensation for longer-term debt. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities that signaled falling prices as recently as Nov. 20 show they will increase in the U.S. this year.

Deflation was the growing concern for investors in 2008 as government bond yields fell to historic lows in December, the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of commodities tumbled 53 percent since July and home prices plunged 18 percent amid a deepening recession. Now, the bond market is saying Federal Reserve interest rates at zero percent, President Barack Obama’s $819 billion planned stimulus package and $8.5 trillion of U.S. initiatives to revive credit markets will reignite inflation.

“When the Fed gets finished here they will have an inflation nightmare on their hands,” said Mark MacQueen, who helps oversee $7 billion as co-founder of Sage Advisor Services Ltd. in Austin, Texas. “There is a lot of downside in conservative government bonds.”

MacQueen is selling 30-year Treasuries, which are more sensitive to inflation expectations than shorter-maturity debt.

Rising Yields

The yield on 30-year Treasury bonds climbed 29 basis points, or 0.29 percentage point, to 3.61 percent last week, according to BGCantor Market Data. The price of the 4.5 percent security due in May 2038 declined 5 29/32, or $59.06 per $1,000 face amount, to 116 2/32. For the month, the yield rose 93 basis points, the most since climbing 100 basis points in April 1981.

The yield fell three basis points to 3.57 percent at 8:08 a.m. in New York.

Yields are rising so fast they are already higher than where economists just three weeks ago expected they’d be at year-end. The median estimate of 44 economists, investors and strategists surveyed by Bloomberg News from Jan. 5 to Jan. 12 was for 3.45 percent by 2010.

Investors in 30-year bonds lost 14.6 percent last month, according to Merrill Lynch & Co. index data. January was the worst month for government securities since Merrill Lynch began tracking returns on the securities in 1988. (That was a drop from a record spike high however - Jesse)

Yields on 10-year notes fell to the lowest on record in December as the cost of living dropped 0.7 percent, trimming the annual advance to 0.1 percent, the smallest rise in half a century, according to the Labor Department in Washington.

Crude Oil

Consumer prices fell as crude oil dropped 78 percent to $32.40 a barrel on Dec. 19 after rising to a record $147.27 in July. House prices in 20 cities plunged by more than 18 percent in November from a year earlier, according to the S&P/Case- Shiller index.

At the current sales rate, it would take a record 12.9 months to absorb all the unsold homes on the market. That’s more than twice as much as the five to six months that the National Association of Realtors in Washington says is consistent with a stable market.

We are in the midst of a deflationary freefall,” said John Brynjolfsson, the chief investment officer at hedge fund Armored Wolf LLC in Aliso Viejo, California. “I don’t anticipate there is anything the Fed can do to prevent that from continuing for the next six to 12 months.”

So-called real yields that measure the difference between Treasuries and the inflation rate turned negative in November 2007 and stayed there until October, dropping as low as negative 1.79 percent in August.

Real Yields

Except for one month in 2005, the last time real yields were negative was 1980, when the Fed raised interest rates to 20 percent to fight inflation that exceeded 14 percent. During that time, real yields were below zero for 23 of 24 months ending December 1980. (The Fed will do this at some point AFTER inflation has become apparent. There will be a significant opportunity to lock in high yields on annuitites, utilities with DRIPS, and the purchase of zero coupons. But that is some years away. It sticks in my mind because I made my parents retirement very comfortable using this strategy in 1980. Timing wil be important.- Jesse)

Policy makers led by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke cut the target rate for overnight loans between banks to a range of zero to 0.25 percent in December to revive lending and stem deflation. Obama’s stimulus plan passed the U.S. House Jan. 28 and went to the Senate for approval.

The current real yield is in line with the average 2.71 percentage points in the past 20 years, showing investors see an increasing threat in inflation. By the fourth quarter, consumer prices will accelerate at a 1.75 percent annual rate, according to the median estimate of 56 economists surveyed by Bloomberg.

Yield Curve

The difference in rates on two- and 10-year notes, known as the yield curve, has steepened from a six-month low of 125 basis points on Dec. 26 to 189 basis points on Jan. 30. That’s more than double the average of 91 basis points over the last two decades. Investors usually demand more compensation on longer- maturity debt when inflation is accelerating, causing the curve to steepen.

We see the Fed and all the policy action gaining traction and reflating the economy,” said Mihir Worah, who oversees $65 billion in inflation-linked securities for Newport Beach, California-based Pacific Investment Management Co., the manager of the world’s biggest bond fund.

Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, or TIPS, due in 10 years yield 1 percentage point less than notes that aren’t linked to consumer prices. The so-called break-even rate, which reflects traders’ outlook for consumer prices, is up from negative 0.08 percent on Nov. 20.

TIPS pay interest on a principal amount that rises with the Labor Department’s consumer price index. TIPS ended last week at 103 13/32 to yield 1.75 percent.

Inflation concerns are also rising outside the U.S. Charteris Portfolio Managers bought inflation-protected bonds for the first time for its top-performing U.K. gilt fund.

Fed Assets

The City Financial Strategic Gilt Fund started investing in index-linked bonds in November and now holds 65 percent of its assets in the securities, Ian Williams, chief executive officer of Charteris, said in an interview last week in London.

“Government attempts to reflate the economy, especially in the U.S., will ultimately work,” Williams said. “It’s too pessimistic a view to see all this money being pumped into the system and still assume it’s all going to fail.”

The Fed’s assets have grown by $1 trillion over the past year under credit programs ranging from $416 billion in term loans to banks to purchases of $350 billion in commercial paper issued by U.S. corporations. Cash that banks can lend to consumers and business, known as excess reserves, rose to almost $844 billion in the week ended Jan. 14, central bank data shows.

Debt Sales

We are already seeing a huge expansion of the Fed balance sheet and the multipliers that are implicit there are extraordinary,” said Brynjolfsson at Armored Wolf. “Double- digit inflation is not out of the question in the following decade.”

The corporate bond market offers one sign that the efforts by the Fed to unfreeze credit markets may be working. Companies sold $138 billion of debt last month in the U.S., the most since May, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Fed officials suggested that prices are increasing too slowly at last week’s meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee. “The committee sees some risk that inflation could persist for a time below rates that best foster economic growth and price stability in the longer term,” the FOMC said in a Jan. 28 statement.

The Fed and Treasury will do whatever they can to get the economy going and that is ultimately what will stop deflation,” said Ethan Harris, co-head of U.S. economic research at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York. “It’s clear they will keep their foot on the accelerator until you get real growth.”


01 February 2009

Corruption as an Element in the Financial Crisis - Forbes


The only surprising thing about this essay is that it appears in Forbes.

After the demise of Glass-Steagall the gloves came off and corruption became an unusually prominent factor in our financial system. There should be little doubt that the taint reached the highest levels in the US over the past ten years or more, and is still a serious problem.


Forbes
Corruption And The Global Financial Crisis
Daniel Kaufmann
01.27.09, 02:58 PM EST

The financial debacle has many causes and implications, but it would be wrong to underestimate systemic corruption.

It would be very convenient to start this article by stating that corruption is a challenge mainly for public officials in developing countries and that it is unrelated to the current global crisis.

I also wish I could claim that corruption has declined worldwide as a result of the global anti-corruption and awareness-raising campaign, the many effective anti-corruption commissions, and the recognition that poverty and culture are the reasons why corruption prevails.

But none of it is true. For starters, corruption is not unique to developing countries, nor has it declined on average. Some developing countries, such as Chile and Botswana, exhibit lower levels of corruption than some fully industrialized nations. And countries like Colombia and Liberia have made gains in recent years, while others, such as Zimbabwe, have deteriorated. Bribery remains rife in many countries, totaling about $1 trillion globally every year.

In truth, anti corruption commissions, revised laws and awareness-raising campaigns have had limited success. Focus on petty or administrative bribery has been misplaced at the expense of high-level political corruption.

One neglected dimension of political corruption is "state capture," or just "capture." In this scenario, powerful companies (or individuals) bend the regulatory, policy and legal institutions of the nation for their private benefit. This is typically done through high-level bribery, lobbying or influence peddling
.

The cost to society of bribing a bureaucrat to obtain a permit to operate a small firm pales in comparison with, say, a telecommunications conglomerate that corrupts a politician to shape the rules of the game granting it monopolistic rights, or an investment bank influencing the regulatory and oversight regime governing them.

As a country becomes industrialized, its governance and corruption challenges do not disappear. They simply morph and become more sophisticated: Transfer of a briefcase stashed with cash is less frequent.

Instead, subtler forms of capture and "legal corruption" exist: an expectation of a future job for a regulator in a lobbying firm, or a campaign contribution with strings attached. In many countries this may be legal, even if unethical. In industrialized nations undue influence is often legally exercised by powerful private interests, which in turn influence the nation's regulations, policies and laws.

This has dire consequences: Witness the various forms of corruption underlying the current global financial crisis that started in the U.S.

There are multiple causes of the financial crisis. But we can not ignore the element of "capture" in the systemic failures of oversight, regulation and disclosure in the financial sector. Concrete examples abound...

(The examples given are Fannie Freddie, AIG, the mortgage lenders, and the Investment Banks)

The new U.S. administration has stated its intention to address the challenges of transparency and accountability in its stimulus plan. The devil will be in the details. Merely creating an oversight institution will not do; system-wide reforms in incentives are required. Deep-seated transparency reforms need to be a cornerstone in the government's plan, and should apply to U.S. public agencies as well as domestic and international financial institutions. Regulations supporting effective disclosure, as well as improved audit, accounting and risk-rating standards, should be preferred to restrictive regulatory controls that block innovation and growth.

Humbly learning from other nations will also go a long way. The situation in the U.S. warrants studying other countries--for instance, Sweden and Chile, which successfully addressed their financial crises long ago. Chile also offers guidance on how to structure less corrupt and effective concessions in infrastructure, where the U.S. is a novice.

In order to restore confidence, citizens, entrepreneurs and bankers need to have renewed trust in the financial system. That way they can be persuaded that it is no longer a giant Ponzi scheme. Transparency is the key.