Wall Street On ParadeHere Is What’s Fraying Nerves Among the Financial Stability Folks at TreasuryBy Pam Martens and Russ MartensJune 10, 2015On Monday, Richard Berner worried aloud at the Brookings Institution about what’s troubling the smartest guys in the room about today’s markets.Berner is the Director of the Office of Financial Research (OFR) at the Treasury Department. That’s the agency created under the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation to, according to their web site, “shine a light in the dark corners of the financial system to see where risks are going, assess how much of a threat they might pose,” and, ideally, provide the analysis to the folks sitting on the Financial Stability Oversight Council in time to prevent another 2008-style financial collapse on Wall Street.Two notable concerns stood out in Berner’s talk. First was a concern about liquidity in bond markets evaporating rapidly for reasons they don’t yet “sufficiently understand.”...Another major concern are the bond mutual funds and ETFs that have mushroomed since the 2008 crisis and are stuffed full of illiquid assets or assets which might become illiquid in a financial panic.
10 June 2015
Fragility: What Has the Watchers Worried In the US Debt Markets
In the last financial crisis 2008, it was the failure of the two Bear Stearns hedge funds that exposed the grossly mispriced risks in mortgage backed financial assets, and the generally flawed nature of the market's collateralized debt obligations. This led to a cascade of failures in fraudulently priced assets, and resulted in increasingly large institutional failures, including the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
One can draw some parallels with the financial crisis before that, which was the gross mispricing of risk and inflated values of internet-related tech companies that had grown to obviously epic proportions by 2000. A failure of several key tech bellwethers to make their numbers, and some negative results in the economy, showed the flaws in the underlying assumptions in what was clearly an asset bubble. And once the selling started, it was Katy-bar-the-door.
The failure of two relatively minor hedge funds was not a great event. The failure of a tech bellwether to make its quarterly numbers is not either. But their interconnectedness to the other portions of the world markets through the financial institutions on Wall Street, and more importantly, the fragile nature of the entire pyramid scheme of fraudulently constructed and mispriced risk of financial assets, caused an inherently shaky system to fall apart. What was most shocking was how quickly it happened once the dominos started falling.
The debt market in the US, with its deep ties to private equities, is probably not a trigger event, the fuse itself. But it well might serve as the powder keg that will transmit the effects of some more individual event throughout the world's markets and economies.
The gross mispricing of risks in financial paper, again, and the lack of reform in the financial system along with excessive leverage and mispricing of risk, the fragility of long distorted markets if you will, has certainly risen to impressive levels again.
It is a familiar template of recklessness, fraud, and then reckoning. Afterward there is the usual attempt to blame the government officials which have been corrupted, and the people who have been duped and swindled. Quite often some scapegoat will be found to be demonized.
I am thinking that this time the problem will arise overseas, with the failure of some major financial institutions there. Perhaps Greece will provide the spark. Or the Ukraine, or Mideast, or something yet unforeseen. The failure of some major European bank certainly has historical precedent.
And if we do experience another crisis, do not be surprised if the moguls of finance come to the Congress through their proxies again, with a sheet of paper in hand demanding hundreds of billions of dollars, or else.
Last time it was a bail-out, which was the printing of money by the Fed to monetize the banking losses and shift them to the public. This time they are thinking of something more direct, talking about a bail-in. What if they eliminated cash, and started utilizing and redploying financial assets like savings and pensions. The uber-wealthy already have their wealth parked in hard income-producing assets and offshore tax havens. Who would stop them?
Like war, there will be an end to this kleptocratic economy of bubble economics and financial crises when the costs are borne by those responsible for it, and who so far are benefitting from it, enormously.
Tell us why you think it might be different this time. What has really changed? From what I can tell, it has not only stayed the same for the most part under the cosmetics of change, and significant portions of the financial landscape have gotten decidedly more dangerous, larger, and more leveraged.