"I have one other issue I'd like to throw on the table. I hesitate to do it, but let me tell you some of the issues that are involved here. If we are dealing with psychology, then the thermometers one uses to measure it have an effect. I was raising the question on the side with Governor Mullins of what would happen if the Treasury sold a little gold in this market.There's an interesting question here because if the gold price broke [lower] in that context, the thermometer would not be just a measuring tool. It would basically affect the underlying psychology.Now, we don't have the legal right to sell gold but I'm just frankly curious about what people's views are on situations of this nature because something unusual is involved in policy here. We're not just going through the standard policy where the money supply is expanding, the economy is expanding, and the Fed tightens. This is a wholly different thing."
If you take a look at the Fed minutes over the years you will see that Bernanke's response to the Congress that the FOMC does not think about gold is just prevaricating nonsense.
At this point I am getting curious why the Fed in particular would wish to see the price of gold kept down. And I don't say this too lightly, but it would take a serious effort to ignore the blatant and heavy handed public relations campaign downplaying the value of gold, in the face of increasing physical demand around the world, and the undeniable fact that for the first time in several decades the central banks of the world have turned from being net sellers to net buyers.
As we see from the minutes above most clearly, the Fed was watching gold carefully for indications of monetary inflation. And this was during the long bear market in gold in the 1990s when central banks were still routinely and openly selling gold to keep the price lower.
Or is this 'a wholly different things' as then chairman Greenspan said above? Are we at that kind of moment that Eddie George, the governor of the Bank of England, talked about in late 1999, culminating in the infamous Brown's Bottom when England's financiers sold her gold on the cheap, presumably to bail out the Banking speculators.
"We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken down all the rest in their wake. Therefore at any price, at any cost, the central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it. It was very difficult to get the gold price under control but we have now succeeded. The US Fed was very active in getting the gold price down. So was the U.K."
This current pool operation is indeed odd, unless one subscribes to the idea of a currency war pitting the US dollar status quo against the emerging economies who wish to find alternatives to what they feel is an abusive, almost neo-colonial form of monetary repression and at times a facility for plunder.
Although as I have mentioned before, I have a very open mind to the notion that some of the shenanigans from the last decade put some official sector and too big to fail jokers 'over their skis' in the precious metal markets, to the extent that Eddie George's abyss was starting to yawn like the Grand Canyon again. I never like to attribute to bad policy what can be just as easily attributed to purely stupid and short-sighted personal concerns and greed.
August looks to be a littler more interesting at The Bucket Shop. There were some more dribbles out of the warehouse, and the 'leverage' of claims is probably still well over 100:1. I'll have a look at it when mon ami Nick puts out his latest.
Fundamentally speaking, if we dare do such a thing in such dodgy markets, the demand for physical silver is increasing in 2015 while the supply is contracting, resulting in a projected deficit for the year.
Have a pleasant evening.