Stocks and Precious Metals Charts - The FOMC Punch and Judy Show - Non-Farm Payrolls Tomorrow

“The tyrant is a child of pride, who drinks from his sickening cup recklessness and vanity, until from his high flown crest he plummets headlong into the dust of hope."

Sophocles, Oedipus Rex


“So much for Caligula the Emperor; the rest of this history must deal with the Monster."

Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars

Stocks were digesting their recent gains today, while glorying in the weak economic data.

It was announced today that Trumpolini intends to nominate Herman Cain as a Fed governor.  This easily tops his most recent nomination of Stephen Moore, who was at least nominally qualified despite being a certified Art Laffer collaborating supply-sider.

Thank God Trump does not own a favorite horse.

Having this many knuckleheads managing the world's most powerful currency and providing significant regulatory oversight to the US economy may be unintentionally very good for gold.

This reminds us of the need for checks and balances, and oversight as a restraint on the abuses of authority.  While it is tempting to unleash the power of nearly unrestrained fiat money in order to solve short term problems, one must consider who might one day be wielding such dangerous, highly discretionary power.

Speaking of restraints on reckless behaviour, gold and silver were hit hard and early, but managed to recoup their losses and actually finish higher on the day.   They closed higher as did the Dollar.  One might have thought it was a furtive, early move by some towards safe havens.

Sooner or later a crash is coming, and it may be terrific.

Non-farm payrolls report tomorrow.

Have a pleasant evening.

Update on the CrashTrak Equity Profile - A Banquet of Consequences Part II

"One of the most disturbing facts that came out in the [Adolf] Eichmann trial was that a psychiatrist examined him and pronounced him perfectly sane. I do not doubt it at all, and that is precisely why I find it disturbing.

If all the Nazis had been psychotics, as some of their leaders probably were, their appalling cruelty would have been in some sense easier to understand. It is much worse to consider this calm, 'well-balanced,' unperturbed official conscientiously going about his desk work, his administrative job which happened to be the supervision of mass murder.  He was thoughtful, orderly, unimaginative.  He had a profound respect for system...

The sanity of Eichmann is disturbing. We equate sanity with a sense of justice, with humaneness, with prudence, with the capacity to love and understand other people. We rely on the sane people of the world to preserve it from barbarism, madness, destruction. And now it begins to dawn on us that it is precisely the sane ones who are the most dangerous...

The whole concept of sanity in a society where spiritual values have lost their meaning is itself meaningless."

Thomas Merton, Raids on the Unspeakable

When you have allowed sociopaths to erect a system which rewards expediency, cleverness, and winning without regard and respect for human values, fairness, or even common mercy and the dignity of others; a society which views compassion and a sense of justice as a weakness to the point of a dangerous deviancy; a culture in which harshness and crudeness and the abuse of power in pursuit of even more wealth, or of the weak as an enjoyable diversion for the superior, are enshrined with a sign of growing strength the only virtue— with such role models and rewards, what else would you expect the highly educated but spiritually weak-willed and morally ambivalent professionals among you to do?

They will implement and execute to plan, under the cover of playing within the rules of a rigged game, with an efficient and myopically determined focus as they do with all that they undertake. They will march themselves into hell with a deluded sense of pride and high accomplishment.

And where do you think this madness will end?

If the bulls cannot stop the selling, put in a bottom, and turn this around we might be in for something notable.

Hopefully the bulls will be able to get their act together to at least stop the selling as they square up their positions into the holiday.

I have to say that I am not 'feeling the fear' yet and the safehavens are notably quiet.

And it would not take a lot to turn the market higher. A word or two from Trump, or one of his proxies, or the Fed's Jay Powell would likely do the trick.

The risk in that is, of course, that if they give it a go and it does not stick, then after an initial bounce the market may take another leg down with a vengeance.   And once the panic sets in, and the real fear selling is underway, it may be too late for jaw-boning to work, even if one if wielding the jawbone of a truly formidable donkey.

I have started to populate the spreadsheets I made in 2000, and last used in 2007, which track the movement of this market and compare it with significant declines from the past.

I have been underestimating the volatility in the NDX using eyeball measures on the chart. One really needs to plug the numbers in.

This is a light trading week. If the bulls cannot turn it on Wednesday or Friday then their hearts may not be in it.

The market is not dominated by 'value investing' but by momentum traders and algos. In that sense it is vulnerable to an outsized move, both up and down.

If there is a 'crash' as I noted some time ago there is little doubt it will be blamed on Trump's trade policies, and to some extent Brexit. This would be a coup for the globalists and freetraders.

They will never acknowledge that the Banks and their Fed willfully allowed an asset bubble to grow, for the third time, in order to continue the transfer of wealth to the top under the guise of investment and asset allocation.

When I dropped my son off at the airport I told him the stock market may crash while he is there, but not to be concerned because I have made provisions.

You may wish to do so as well, even though I still think a crash is a low probability event.

See you tonight.

Nomi Prins: Central Banks' Policy Errors and the Bubbles and Busts That Follow - Currency Resets

"Central banks and institutions like the IMF and the World Bank are overstepping the boundaries of their mandates by using the flow of money to control global markets and dictate economic policy both at the domestic and global level. These public institutions have become so dependent on funding from private banking and the revolving door between the two worlds is so smooth that public and private banks are effectively working toward the same goals.

A crash could prove to be President Trump’s worst legacy. Not only is he— and the Fed he’s helping to create— not paying attention to the alarm bells (ignored by the last iteration of the Fed as well), but he’s ensured that none of his appointees will either.

After campaigning hard against the ills of global finance in the 2016 election campaign and promising a modern era Glass-Steagall Act to separate bank deposits from the more speculative activities on Wall Street, Trump's policy reversals and appointees leave our economy more exposed than ever. When politicians and regulators are asleep at the wheel, it’s the rest of us who will suffer sooner or later. Because of the collusion that’s gone on and continues to go on among the world’s main central banks, that problem is now an international one."

Nomi Prins

Although it is a little dated, this talk by Nomi Prins waa brought to mind by the current situation in the US financial markets.

I was also struck by Grant Williams' recent interview with William White about the descending spiral in which the central banks seem to be caught in continuing to prop up financial asset prices out of fear of perturbing the Frankenstein banking system that they created over the past twenty years.

And it is almost astonishing that the hedge fund and managed money crowd are now holding short positions against the risk safe havens of 10Yr Treasuries, VIX and Gold are at near term or record highs.

I am not going to be forecasting a crash, at least not yet.  And even when the time comes, all one can do is sound an alarm when the conditions seem to indicate that low probability event may be at a greater chance than normal,

But what I am saying now is that risk seems to be currently mispriced, at an extreme even compared to recent history, and  that the speculators appear to be reliant, once again, on a confidence in the Fed to bail the moneyed interests out when something awful happens.  At the expense of the unknowing public, it should be added, as has been their custom.

There is a glimmer of organic recovery in the recent signs of life in the velocity of M2, which has halted its breath-taking descent since the crisis. 

But it remains that so much money has been squandered on a fortunate few of the central bank's constituency, and in relatively unproductive ventures  This has accomplished little except increasing wealth inequality and distorting the real economy, leaving it in a weakened state for the next financial crisis.

So it does seem proper to put forward a leveraged risk warning.   Now may be an opportunity to take some shelter from the excesses of ideological folly and the unrestrained greed that feeds it.

Stocks and Precious Metals Charts - Elevated Economic Hazards - Comex Option Expiry Thursday

"No amount of observations of white swans can allow the inference that all swans are white, but the observation of a single black swan is sufficient to refute that conclusion."

David Hume


“It has been more profitable for us to bind together in the wrong direction than to be alone in the right one. Those who have followed the assertive idiot rather than the introspective wise person have passed us some of their genes.  This is apparent from a social pathology:  psychopaths rally followers.”

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, The Black Swan


"Definite signs that business and industry have turned the corner from the temporary period of emergency that followed deflation of the speculative market were seen today by President Hoover. The President said the reports to the Cabinet showed the tide of employment had changed in the right direction." -

News dispatch from Washington, January 21, 1930


“The narcissist devours people, consumes their output, and casts the empty, writhing shells aside.”

Sam Vaknin

Stocks were soaring higher as Alphabet, the stock formerly known as Google, put in some good results, sending the FANGs soaring.

But tech faded and turned around, just managing to finish unchanged.

There will be a Comex gold option expiration on Thursday the 26^th.

We are in the thick of earnings season now, and individual result are sending some stocks soaring or plunging.

The IMF estimates that the US Dollar is overvalued from 8 to 16 percent.

I think gold expressed in dollars is undervalued by from 60 to 100 percent.

Let's how all the reversions to the mean go.

There was intraday commentary regarding the dangers of the derivatives markets to the Too-Big-To-Fail boys here.

It's probably early days, but now might be the time to start taking precautions against a 2008 class event in the financial markets. I would suggest it might arrive anytime between now and July 2020.

These sorts of things depend on the magnitude of any 'trigger event,' which is why it is so difficult to forecast with regard to specific dates.

As time goes on the required force for a market moving event decreases until it takes very little to set that ball in motion.

Need little, want less, love more. For those who abide in love abide in God, and God in them.

Have a pleasant evening.

The Warning Part II: Financial Armageddon, Again - Blood Moon - Trump Trade Policy the Patsy?

"Ultimately, the same financial architecture that surrounded the housing mortgage crisis (almost certainly including 'naked' credit default swaps) has been replicated in the three key areas where debt is growing at a troubling rate: defaults in student loans, auto loans, and credit card debt...

Thus, as the tenth anniversary of the Lehman failure approaches, there is an understanding among many market regulators and swaps trading experts that large portions of the swaps market have moved from U.S. bank holding company swaps dealers to their newly deguaranteed foreign affiliates.  ['off balance sheet' part deux]

But, what has not moved abroad is the very real obligation of the lender of last resort to rescue these U.S. swaps dealer bank holding companies if they fail because of poorly regulated swaps in their deguaranteed foreign subsidiaries, i.e., the U.S. taxpayer.

While relief is unlikely to be forthcoming from either the Trump Administration or a Republican-controlled Congress, some other means will have to be found to avert another multitrillion dollar bank bailout and/or financial calamity caused by poorly regulated swaps on the books of big U.S. banks...

By their own design, large U.S. bank holding company swaps [derivatives] dealers and their representatives have crafted their own massive loopholes from Dodd-Frank swaps regulations, which they can exercise at their own will.

By arranging, negotiating and executing swaps in the U.S. with U.S. personnel and then ‘assigning’ them to their ‘foreign’ newly ‘deguaranteed’ subsidiaries, these swaps dealers have the best of both worlds: swaps execution in the U.S. under the parent bank holding companies’ direct control, but the ability to move the swaps abroad out from under Dodd-Frank.

As history has demonstrated all too well, unregulated swaps dealing almost always ultimately leads to extreme economic suffering and then too often to systemic breaks in the world economy, thereby putting U.S. taxpayers, who suffer all the economic distress that recessions bring, in the position of once again being the lender of last resort to these huge U.S. institutions.

The Obama CFTC tried to put an end to these loopholes through a proposed rule and interpretations in October 2016.  However, those efforts were never finalized
before Donald Trump assumed the Presidency.  There will almost certainly be no relief from these dysfunctions from the Trump Administration or Congress.

However, state attorneys general and various state financial regulators have the statutory legal tools to enjoin these loopholes and save the world’s economy and U.S. taxpayers from once again suffering a massive bailout burden and an economic Armageddon."

Michael Greenberger, Too Big to Fail U.S. Banks’ Regulatory Alchemy


"'We didn't truly know the dangers of the market, because it was a dark market,' says Brooksley Born, the head of an obscure federal regulatory agency -- the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] -- who not only warned of the potential for economic meltdown in the late 1990s, but also tried to convince the country's key economic powerbrokers to take actions that could have helped avert the crisis. 'They were totally opposed to it,' Born says. 'That puzzled me. What was it that was in this market that had to be hidden?'...

'It'll happen again if we don't take the appropriate steps,' Born warns. 'There will be significant financial downturns and disasters attributed to this regulatory gap over and over until we learn from experience.'"

PBS Frontline, The Warning

While the mainstream media says 'Russia, Russia, Russia' and the Administration says 'Immigrants, Trade, and Deregulate' the Banks may be setting up the US taxpayer for another taste of Financial Armageddon and a multi-trillion dollar bailout under duress.

As Trumpolini says, the US Taxpayer is 'the piggy bank' that is going to be robbed.  But it may not be at the hands of foreign mercantilists, but by domestic predators, wrapping themselves in the Constitution and the flag.

Or perhaps Michael Greenberger and Brooksley Born are just alarmists that don't really understand modern finance.

But maybe, just maybe, the Fed and the regulators are conveniently asleep at the switch, again.  And we are going to be forced to go through that whole, horrible episode of hidden leverage and multi-tiered frauds for the great benefit of a very few and their enablers in the professions and the government again.

Do they really know?  Are the people charged with protecting the public sure?  Will we even care until its too late?  Is all this fear-mongering hoopla about external threats just another misdirection, a distraction from the real crisis unfolding?  Is Trump, and his trade policy, being set up as a patsy for the next crash?

I would say that the probabilities are unacceptably high that another black swan may be coming home to roost.  And that the beneficiaries of this rotten system will do nothing to stop it, again.


Related and h/t for link to this paper:  Wall Street’s Derivatives Nightmare: New York Times Does a Shallow [CYA] Dive

Pam Martens' Warning to the Fed and the Clintons in 1998 - And She Warns Them Again Now

It is the same players that we saw enabling reckless behaviour in 1998: Citigroup, the Fed, and the Clinton-led Wall Street Democrats.

And here we are again, almost eighteen years later, watching the same short term, selfish behaviour by the big money banks putting the entire economy of productive individuals at risk again.

"There’s something big and scary going on behind the scenes but, as usual, the public isn’t reading about it on the front pages of the newspapers...

Dodd-Frank was supposed to push the derivatives out of the commercial banks which hold the insured deposits to prevent another taxpayer bailout, the so-called “push out” rule. But in December of 2014, Citigroup was able to sneak legislation into the must-pass spending bill to keep the government running that overturned the push-out rule...

Using its insured bank’s balance sheet as ballast, Citigroup’s bank holding company now ranks as the largest holder of all derivatives in the U.S. According to the Comptroller of the Currency, the very bank that blew itself up in 2008 and received the largest taxpayer bailout in history, now holds $55 trillion in notional amount of derivatives.

But far more alarming is the type of derivatives Citigroup appears hell bent on gaining market share in trading. Last week we reported that Citigroup is plowing into credit default swaps, the very derivatives that blew up the big insurance company, AIG, in 2008 and forced a government bailout of AIG to the tune of $185 billion...

On March 8 of this year [2016], the Office of Financial Research, which was created under the Dodd-Frank legislation to monitor the buildup of systemic financial risks, released a study on Credit Default Swaps. Its findings were deeply troubling...”

You may read the entire article at Wall Street On Parade.

An Open Letter To Paul Krugman On the 'Republican Lust for Gold'

"People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage."

John Kenneth Galbraith, Age of Uncertainty

This is a response to Mr. Krugman's recent column as it was featured at Economist's View titled, Republican Lust for Gold

I am not in favor of a return to a gold standard.

I am a reasonably well-educated, politically progressive professional, a likely supporter of Bernie Sanders as an economic reformer and an opponent of endless war, and certainly not the 'Wall Street Democrats.'   I believe that the current 'debate' over the place of gold in the economy is breaking along ideological lines to the point of a religious fervor and intellectual blindness, on both sides.

I think of gold as an alternative store of wealth, which without any sanctions from the state pro or con can serve a very useful purpose. It gives people a 'choice.' It can act as a barometer of sentiment. And it serves a purpose, especially in times of pervasive fraud in the financial asset markets, as an asset without mispriced or even hidden counterparty risk if held directly.

And if you think that the problem of pervasive fraud has been fixed you are sorely mistaken.

If a system cannot stand the criticism offered by something which it cannot and probably ought not to control, then perhaps the fault is in the system, and not in the critics.

And while we are on the topic, what by any stretch of the imagination do you subscribe the issue of 'gold' to the Republican establishment? Who shut the gold window in 1971? One of the few things that Chairman Greenspan said is that statists from both sides of the aisle despise and fear gold because it constrains them in their quest for discretionary power. And he was right.

The current 'stimulus' is a massive failure because it has been trying to save a broken and largely unreformed financial system, rather than provide stimulus and support to the vast majority of the participants. It is the consequence of placing the highest priority in means and methods, because they are 'ours.' Our method, our model. First and foremost. Because we fear for our credibility.

And so the participants who are complicit in the fraud and those who are invested politically in the models and methods both become ensnared in a 'credibility trap,' and what Mike Lofgren has called 'the anti-knowledge of the elite.'

Unfortunately, Gresham's law is still works. Gold, and to a lesser extent silver, are flowing 'en masse' to Asia in almost astonishing numbers of tonnes each month. The numbers are there, little publicized and noted in the prestige media, but almost shocking. It has not yet made its way fully into official reporting mechanisms, even so called 'industry organs.'

Mr. Krugman, nine out of ten Americans will notice that the vast peoples of Asia and the Mideast are not 'Republicans.'   The central banks of the world are hardly 'Republicans,' but they became net buyers of gold around 2007.

No, they are not the easily mocked Republicans.

But they are looking for a safe alternative to a monetary and financial system that is going off the rails, again.  The modern hypothesis that all money is purely arbitrary is only feasible if one has the ability to make their purely arbitrary valuations stick.   That is the Faustian bargain with the will to power, the endless war of the monetary relativists.

Would we make enemies of the whole world for the sake of a corrupt and unsustainable financial system? Alas, some would, and are doing so even now.

As I am sure you know, once a force like Gresham's Law goes into effect, which it already has, it can quickly turn into a torrent of consequences.  Will we continue to argue until that event is upon us, as we did with the prevalent fraud in the housing bubble that was created by the same perpetrators who have continued to rig markets even until today?

The dogmatic modelist and political hack sees China and India and other nations buying gold and says, 'We must stop this! Control it!' The thinker sees a sea change in the monetary markets and says, 'we must understand why this is happening, and what we may be doing to provoke it. And if we are doing something wrong, then correct it.'

No I do not support the gold standard, not at all. It would be entirely inappropriate for a patient still in the ICU to be prescribed a regime of hard exercise and strict diet. And the corruption in this system is capable of corrupting anything, even an external standard.

Given the proper regulation, transparency, and judgement, a paper currency can emulate the steadiness of a gold standard while allowing for more latitude in times of distress. Do you really believe that we have held to that prescription with our serial bubbles, frauds and crises?

But I do feel quite strongly that the current policy of constant market intervention in the West, which is obviously happening to anyone who is capable and experienced in watching trade patterns, is going to tear a hole in the facade that this sick series of policy errors is becoming.

If one takes even a cursory look at the trade flows of gold, one can see that the flows into Asia and the Mideast are relentless, and growing. And the decline of 'free float' in the UK and US in particular is striking. The numbers are difficult to discover, but some have taken on that task.

The leverage and shuffling of free bullion around to dull the interest in leverage is approaching 300 to 1 in NYC and 200 to 1 in the 'physical' LBMA market in London is the kind of obvious error that one looks back at from the wreckage and says, 'What were they thinking?'

We made a mistake. A big one.  We have tolerated a farcically ineffective program of 'reform' and a massive top down stimulus focused on the 'system' with an austerity for the public that is going to rip a tear in the social fabric which will take years, and a significant amount of pain, to mend.

It is going to happen, no matter what models or arguments you may wish to stick your head in. I am not trying to argue a point. I am trying to encourage people to at least look at what is happening, and to stop comforting themselves with obviously faulty numbers and metrics from a system that has stopped serving most participants in favor of a powerful few.

This is going to end badly. I was more demure when we had similar discussions here like this prior to the housing bubble collapse. 'And no one could have seen it coming.'  Because their eyes were closed and they comforted themselves with what they wanted to hear.

There is, at some point, going to be a dislocation in the international currency and bond markets.   And it will be noticeable, unless we change our ways and embrace honesty, transparency, broader equity, and reform.

It will not come from the political process, because that has also been broken by the power of big money.  That has become so painfully obvious that the only way to continue to justify it is to declare corporations to be 'people' and bribery to be 'free speech.'

People may think of themselves as 'Keynesians,'  and what the 'other side' thinks about Keynes is admittedly mostly an ideologically tainted caricature.  But first and foremost what made Keynes effective was his practical focus on the desired results and not to a preconceived model which crushes out the better part of reality in its understandable and unfortunate inadequacy that is common to all 'models.'  Keynes was an independent thinker who was confident enough to occasionally change his mind without worrying overmuch about his credibility, and not an acolyte of some constraining school of thought made dogma. 

No, rather than a 'gold standard' now I think gold should stand alone, and be allowed to speak whatever truths it may. As for any use of it by nations, let them make what use of it as they wish. It is a tool. But once they make it 'official' they cannot seem to keep from trying to cage it, and control it. But by then it is merely collateral damage of a growing corruption and fraud of finance, rarely without an accomplice in monetary economics.

At some point the thought leaders will have to rise above their own political enthusiasms and personal aspirations and begin to honestly and openly address what is going wrong. And then perhaps we may begin to push for the return of some of the basic principles hammered out in the 'New Deal' which we so foolishly allowed to be weakened and then overthrown in the 1990s, and even until now.

And, Mr. Krugman, that was a decidedly bipartisan effort. And the players and their enablers who brought us that misery are still active, unabashedly, in the highest circles of power.

Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - Non-Farm Payrolls Next Week - Tail Risk Warning

Gold just will not give us a signal to buy for the short term here yet.  So I remain sitting tight on all my long term positions.  Same with silver.

I did buy a little short side on stocks themselves today.

The action in the precious metals the past few days seemed exceptionally artificial, and that is saying a lot in these markets.

I suspect some of this was end-of-month shenanigans.

The December gold contract is a fairly significant force, and we should start feeling its effects sometime in November.

The Bucket Shop warehouses showed a little more gold passing to the house account at JPM,  and the usual slow leakage out of the silver stores.

The 'nested W' bottom formation is off the table, and now we are in the uptrending range trade, if that can hold as shown on the first chart below.

It has been a long time since we have seen any kind of chart formation working.  This is not a surprise given the obvious price manipulation in gold and silver, similar to what we have seen in so many other markets including the forex which is a cousin to the metals trade.

A Russian bank has joined the Shanghai Gold Exchange, which continues to move impressive amounts of gold bullion from various sources, especially Switzerland and London, into China.

As I have noted previously, the completely new phenomenon of spiking leverage with paper over physical gold in New York and London coincides with the attempt to take the price down after its increase in the most recent leg of the bull market.

I am inclined by what I can see to think that unless the exchanges and the regulators get their act together and rein in the big bullion traders and the mispricing of risk that they are going to have a real mess on their hands if these high levels of leverage get forcibly unwound.

I think the facts bear this out, despite the 'down your nose' scoffing at any risks by apologists and insiders.  But that's just my own opinion, and I doubt anyone involved in the money flows from this trade will care.  And if it does fall apart, 'no one could have seen it coming.'

As Kyle Bass pointed out, no one with a fiduciary (or regulatory) responsibility can ignore what has happened in the gold market since 2013.  But some are, and with an almost reckless disregard.

Let me be clear, since one of the tactics that the apologists use is to purposely misconstrue any warnings.   I am not concerned about a 'default' on the exchange, in the form of a failure to deliver.

Rather, I am saying that the factors that effect tail risks are now so extended in the gold market that even a relatively small imbalance or exogenously driven spike in demand can result in a market dislocation in price that will bring the exchange and perhaps some participants to their knees, and result in a global cascade of grossly mispriced counter-party risks.

Non-Farm Payrolls for October will be reported next week.

Have a pleasant weekend.