Wages: The Median and the Mean

The 'mean' is the average of all wages.

The 'median' is the wage in the middle, that is, what is earned by those people in the numerical middle of the population.

And the ratio of the median to the mean continues to fall, as the rich get richer, and a large part of the country is left behind, as a matter of policy.

This is the plight of 'the 47%.'



Source: SSA

US Employment and Wages, Modern Monetary Theory, Trade, and Financial Reform

There will be a sustainable recovery in the US when the median wage recovers in relation to inflation and consumer necessities, and the employment-population ratio rises to some reasonable equilibrium.

A rising employment-population ratio itself is no sign of recovery, if consumers must continue to rely on debt to finance their basic necessities. Conservsely, a falling employment-population ratio can be constructive if it is driven by a vibrant median wage, increasing industrial productivity, and excess income as savings, allowing for retirements and more people devoted to non formal employment such as charitable activities, parenting, artistic expression, and elder care, for example.   The point is that these measure are not one-dimensional.

As shown by the median wage below, the 'recovery' engineered by the Fed in the aftermath of the tech bubble they created was artificial and totally supported by credit creation and a bubble in housing, with enormous amounts siphoned off the top in the form of financial fraud and corruption.

The basic economic problem in the US economy is related to international trade, currency manipulation, public policy and wage arbitrage by multinational corporations. 'Free trade' interacts with public standards of health, worker compensation, environmental, child labor, and the entire structure of public standards.

Therefore the solution is not amenable to straightforward Keynesian stimulus. This is no cyclical contraction.

It has its roots in the conflict between 'free trade' amongst nations with different standards towards their workers, and various forms of governance.   A democratic republic and a autocratic dictatorship do not have the same  public policies and attitudes towards the individual and their rights vis a vis the state.  How then can free trade reconcile fair wages with what is by comparison virtual slavery?  These are the economics of 'the camps' and the plantations, a familiar attraction for the monied interests who have an abiding love of monopolies and oligarchies. 

And of course the unspoken problem in the US is the pervasive corruption in and overweighting of the financial sector in relation to the productive economy even today after so-called reforms.

On another note, there is renewed discussion of 'Modern Monetary Theory,' and some have asked me again to address this, as I have done previously.  I have only this to add.

I see no inherent problem with the direct issuance of non-debt backed currency as there is sufficient evidence that it can 'work.' Indeed, my own Jacksonian bias toward central banking would suggest that.
I think the notion that the Fed is some objective judge of what is best for the public welfare without effective oversight or restraint is anti-democratic and probably un-Constitutional, at least in spirit, as it has been implemented. And this notion that the FED and the discipline of the interest markets could reliably emulate an external restraint on excessive money creation is deeply flawed.

The problem becomes then how to implement a fiat currency without the discipline of issuing debt through private markets.

This is the important point that most MMT adherents seem to ignore, but it is their greatest area of strength.

One cannot print money at will. The limitation is always and everywhere the willingness of the markets to accept it in exchange for labor and real goods without coercion. To make counter claims is to undermine your own position.

It is a tautology to say that a state that controls its own fiat currency cannot become insolvent in that currency, since they can never lack that which they can create from nothing. The state does not run out of its currency, rather, it runs out of people who will accept it at the official face value.

I would stipulate that central currency issuers can attempt to set arbitrary values, and to enforce them through things like official valuation and wage and price controls. Indeed, practical experience seems to indeed they inevitably must and will become increasingly draconian in their central planning. Dictatorships generally embrace fiat monetary systems without external discipline as policy, but rarely is this a sign of a vibrant economy or a government that respects the individual's rights to just recompense for goods and labor.

The problem with limitless issuance would first appear with necessities that the state must acquire externally, that is, outside their direct sphere of political control. In the case of the United States, for example, oil comes to mind.

I am not suggesting a retur to a gold or silver monetary standard, for that too has its weaknesses and is no panacea. But rather, I am addressing the particular overstatements being made by those who promote the Fed, and those who promote the Treasury, as infallible arbiters of monetary value.

Transparency, oversight, checks and balances are the inherent genius of of the Constitution, and anything that weakens those pillers undermines the democratic Republic.

Most fiat currencies inevitably fail, without regard to their particular mechanisms, because of the weakness and corruption of the people who manage them. This the hard truth that no amount of accounting gimmicks and Utopian central planning can overcome. Such schemes spawn tyranny from their nature, since like a Ponzi scheme they require an ever expanding sphere of absolute control over the daily transactions of the public.

If the inherent evil contained in the concentration of power in a few hands in your concern, then Modern Monetary Theory does not seem to be a viable solution, replacing the Fed with the Treasury, and potentially one form of monetary tyranny with another.

Soaring Corporate Profits As US Worker Pay for Productivity Hits Record Lows

Two sets of charts tell the story.

The problem is that when workers are pressed to the wall on pay they lose the ability to consume without taking on debt. And at some point the debt leverage mechanism for consumption breaks down.

Perhaps the problem is related to the one Wall Street is now confronting. How do you continue on in business after having impoverished, alienated, or driven away most of your clientele in the heat of a short term greed enabled by a corrupted political and regulatory system?

Those who were around in the late 1970's will recall the absolute disrepute in which equities were held by the public after the grinding bear market of 1973-74. Pit traders spent the better part of the day practicing their origami skills, for lack of serious 'outside participation.' Skinning each other when you have run out of greater fools is truly a zero sum game.

Weather report: Cloudy, with a chance of whirlwinds.



Fat profits, slim wages: the fruits of monetary bubbles and trickle down economics.



Charts courtesy of ContraryInvestor.

The Fuel for a Speculative Rally but Not a Recovery

At some point we may stop confusing asset bubbles with economic growth.

In the meantime, we might expect the shallow and immature stewardship of the economy to continue, unreformed and unconstrained. We may get quite a bear market rally in the first quarter of 2009. Whether it is the bottom or a bottom will remain to be seen.

Without a sustained increase in the median hourly wage and significant reform in the financial system and a sustainable construct for international currency exchange and trade there can be no sustained recovery in the real economy.

Excess liquidity and a corrupt financial system provides the fuel for a speculative rally, but it is also the fuel for a greater crisis to come, the longer we maintain this monetary charade. The Fed is pouring gasoline on damp wood.

Still, we ought not to underestimate the power of the Fed, having recently witnessed a counter trend reflationary rally after the Crash of 2000-2 that lasted three years and reached new stock market highs, and a housing bubble that almost crashed the world economy. They appear to have a lot of fuel, from a variety of unconventional sources, and Bernanke has the willingness to use it.

Cash at 18-Year High Makes Stocks a Buy at Leuthold
By Eric Martin and Michael Tsang

Dec. 29 (Bloomberg) -- There’s more cash available to buy shares than at any time in almost two decades, a sign to some of the most successful investors that equities will rebound after the worst year for U.S. stocks since the Great Depression.

The $8.85 trillion held in cash, bank deposits and money- market funds is equal to 74 percent of the market value of U.S. companies, the highest ratio since 1990, according to Federal Reserve data compiled by Leuthold Group and Bloomberg.

Leuthold, Invesco Aim Advisors Inc., Hennessy Advisors Inc. and BlackRock Inc., which together oversee almost $1.7 trillion, say that’s a sign the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index will rise after $1 trillion in credit losses sent the benchmark index for American equities to the biggest annual drop since 1931. The eight previous times that cash peaked compared with the market’s capitalization the S&P 500 rose an average 24 percent in six months, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“There is a store of cash out there that is able to take the market higher,” said Eric Bjorgen, who helps oversee $3.4 billion at Leuthold in Minneapolis. “The same dollar you had last year buys you twice as much S&P 500 as it did a year ago.”

Leuthold Group, whose Grizzly Short Fund returned 83 percent in 2008 thanks to bets against equities, said in its December bulletin to investors that stocks offer “one of the great buying opportunities of your lifetime...”

The ratio of cash on hand to U.S. market capitalization jumped 86 percent in the first 11 months of the year, the biggest increase since the Fed began keeping records in 1959, as the U.S., Europe and Japan fell into the first simultaneous recessions since World War II.

So-called money of zero maturity, the central bank’s measure of U.S. assets available for immediate spending, is mostly held by households, according to Richard G. Anderson, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis....

Any recovery will depend on a rebound in corporate profits and the economy after $30 trillion was wiped out from world equities this year, according to Frederic Dickson, chief market strategist at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Lake Oswego, Oregon. (At that's the rub, a speculative rally fueled by excess liquidity will fizzle and die if it is not accompanied by a recovery in real corporate profits, and that depends on an increase in consumption that is not dependent on additional consumer debt - Jesse)

Jobless claims reached a 26-year high this month, while economists surveyed by Bloomberg estimate household spending will fall 1 percent next year, the most since the aftermath of the attack on Pearl Harbor. A 13 percent slump in the median home resale price in November from a year earlier was likely the largest since the 1930s, the National Association of Realtors said last week, damping speculation the housing market is close to a bottom.

‘Biggest Cannon’

Analysts estimate profits at S&P 500 companies will shrink 10.3 percent in the first three months of 2009 and 5.8 percent in the second quarter, bringing the stretch of earnings declines to a record eight quarters, Bloomberg data show. Gross domestic product will contract in the first half of the year before growth resumes in the third quarter, according to a Bloomberg survey of economists.

“The fuel supply is there, but people have to have a reason to use it,” said Dickson, who helps oversee about $19 billion. “The Fed fired the shot out of the biggest cannon they know. Now the question is, will it hit the right mark?”

This year’s slump has left S&P 500 companies valued at an average of 12.6 times operating profit, the cheapest since at least 1998, monthly data compiled by Bloomberg show...

The last time cash accounted for a larger proportion of market value was 1990. The ratio peaked at 75 percent in October of that year, after the savings and loan industry collapsed, Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc. was forced into bankruptcy and the U.S. fell into a recession. The S&P 500 rallied 23 percent in six months and almost 30 percent in a year...