Recessions and the SP 500

Paul Kasriel's latest reading of his proprietary tea leaves (a blend known as the Kasriel Recession Warning Indicator) estimates the current probability of a recession in the US economy at 65%. As the chart shows, once his KRWI reaches this critical level its a strong probability that we will see an economic recession call by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Even the period following the tech wreck of 2000 eventually read out a formal recession, although the financial engineering of the Fed and federal friends did block the traditional back to back quarters of economic contraction, as the inflation reading is subtracted from the nominal GDP number to develop real GDP. Hard as it may be to believe, the government has simply changed the rules of the game for measuring price inflation in the US, and considerably enough that what used to be a recession may no longer be called one. Changing the rules of the game is a traditional method of the privileged and elite in achieving their goals.

We give a lot of credibility to Paul Kasriel in general, as a classic macro economist who seems unaffected by the dark pollution of biased thought that corporatism has brought to an already dismal and confounding science. The Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) are already calling out recession, and as you know, the classic inversion of the Yield Curve (Ten Year Treasury Yield - Effective Fed Funds Rate) is still negative as of the Fed's official numbers last week.

So it bothers us quite a bit that the stock market, that great discounter of the future and unerringly efficient prognosticator of economic things yet unseen, is presumed to be rallying back to new all time highs, even if only on a nominal level, not accounting for inflation. We show the SP deflated by gold in this chart, and as you can see, the rebound in US stocks is a bit of a mirage. If the bad times are when the tide goes out and shows who's naked, then inflation is the hurricane storm surge that pushes the waters back in, to provide cover for those au naturel.

By the way, the perception of inflation, or inflation expectations, is not incidental, but rather is absolutely key to the kind of financial engineering that neo-Keynesian economists that infest the Fed and Treasury wish to embrace as the ripe fruits of a fiat monetary system. Don't think for one minute that what is happening with M3, CPI revisions, etc. are a mere coincidence. Its all about control of the many by the few, after all.

So what about the stock market? We decided to try and plot out Kasriel's indicator of recessions against the SP 500. Since the nominal SP is also a trend child of inflation, we wanted to get a measure of SP that tends to take out the inflationary trend, and show us the purer wiggles that stocks make in response to the anticipation of economic variations.

If in fact we are on the verge of a recession, the SP500 will likely be in the process of making a top. We might see another push higher by the broad stock indices in response to the unprecedented monetary stimulus being applied by the banks. But even with this latest phase in the financial engineering experienment currently in progress, within the next two months we should see a confirming signal from the equity markets that the economy is turning lower in real terms AND has started contracting, even if the current set of official economic measures say otherwise.

We underestimated the Fed and their banker buddies in the great reflation of 2003-2004, finally catching on to the game after some painful soul searching and genuine confusion. The July 2004 working paper from Small and Close of the Fed, which basically tried to set some boundaries in how far the Fed could go in monetizing things non-traditional was a good clue, well before the infamous speech about the Fed's printing press that gave Helicopter Ben his sobriquet.

So we will strive to not be fooled again, and keep an open mind that the fighting of the housing bubble and massive credit fraud by the banks could have a short term second order effect of inflating the stock markets, along with most other commodities, especially gold and oil. One thing we are certain is that the next twelve months may be among the most interesting we have seen, and can only wonder what we all might be saying about things at this time next year.

Investment Performance for 2007

We were curious to see how various investments had done in 2007, after reading some of the information on internet chat boards this evening. Internet chat boards are places where facts and opinions get tossed around like beer bottles at Jerry's Country Playhouse on a Saturday night.

We Trust In God, Everyone Else Shows the Data

We like to check the data. The reason should be obvious, but if not, its because often people deal with the complexities of life by using assumptions, which are a kind of shorthand way of breaking reality down into manageable chunks. Everyone does it. You have to. But every once in a while its useful to check those assumptions you make, and that other people are making, to see if they are still valid, especially if they involve things that are important. Does your wife still love you? Is there a bus coming down the road you are crossing? Do you really still look as hot as you did last year? Are you financially solvent? Those sorts of things.

2007 Returns of Some Major Stock Indices

Let's compare the 2007 year-to-date performance of some of the major stock indices. As always, if you click on the chart you will see a larger, much easier to read version.

Its a little suprising that the Russell 2000 is still not quite positive for the year, not including dividends or subtracting fees and commissions. There was quite a bit more divergence in the gains of the major stock indices. An index after all is just a grouping of things for measurement purposes. The Russell is the broadest, most inclusive of the indexes we normally watch.

It looks like tech was the champ of the broad stock sectors this year, if for no other reason that they are NOT financial and NOT housing. The Wall Street storyboard is that tech is invulnerable to the vagaries of housing and financial bubbles, and actually benefits from the weakened US dollar because the we are the champions, the kings of tech, and are selling it to the rest of the world, although very little of it is actually made here anymore, and what we do invent is copied and pirated shamelessly. Its a revenue concept thing perhaps, moreso than real hard cash, like page views and web searches and collateralized debt obligations.


Let's Get Physical

Let's take a look at a different type of investment. How about something that is supposed to be impervious to inflation, a barbarous relic, the bane of central banksters and financial voodoo? Since the generally transitory, subjective, and vaporous nature of financially engineered products is in the headlines it might not be a bad idea to throw in something with a long track record as a hardened test of monetary value into the mix.

Holy goldaroney, Batman! That is one surprisingly fine performance for gold this year. Even we did not think that it has been this good. The assumption has been, at least lately, that gold's day will come soon, especially when the Central Banks get finished monkeying with it. Well, its been a much better return this year than most would think offhand. We're in that group, and we watch it! See how easy it is to fall prey to your own assumptions, especially when you think you have been watching something for a long time.

The Usual Investment Suspects

Let's widen the data net a little more, and see how different things compare. We apologize for the lack of variation in colors on this chart, but we had to tinker with the charting tool a little to get so many items on a single snapshot.

Well, there you have it. Some real information about how various investments performed during 2007. We new the US dollar was doing badly. We did not know that gold had done so well, and had outperformed most of the other major alternative so handily (don't forget about those dividends guys. Gold does not pay any, just like a high performing tech stock).

Let's have one more look at a sector that we have admittedly been cool towards for the latter half of this year, because of the general reluctance we have had toward equities.

Data Mining

Well, as someone who has not owned miners for the latter part of the year, we're just a little disappointed that we overlooked such a hot performing sector. Its been a wild ride, and keep in mind that with high returns comes higher beta (variability of return aka risk, and lately that includes return of capital). Remember this is the HUI gold bugs index, and if you have been playing the junior miners heavily you might have ground your teeth to a fine white powder trying to ride those bucking beta broncos.

Our personal preference is to find a few well financed miners that have a shot at paying dividends for a long time if the dollar really tanks and stocks gets smacked down. Bennie and Hank and crew are working overtime to make sure this happens, make no mistake about it. They are just trying to push the date of reckoning into the future. We admit to a bias that says the dollar will inflate significantly further, and then at some point deflate. Its just that we think the deflation will be when they knock a couple zeros off buckaroo. It might not happen that way. We'll stay flexible.


When people put forward ideas that might be important to you, ask for the data. People are often afraid to ask, because they don't want to look foolish. Some people like to put forward their ideas with great ceremony and pomp, and browbeat and belittle anyone who disagrees with them. They often speak with great confidence bordering on arrogance. We'll let you in on a little secret. What we have learned over the years is that if someone can't explain their ideas to you, it just might be that they do not understand the idea themselves. Don't get us wrong. There are some very fundamental beginner questions that people must and should as. Its just that they aren't necessarily best directed to the advanced class. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't ask. Just try to ask the right person in the right places in the right way.

Questions can be annoying. But we find that often they provide the kind of impedance that causes us to revisit them and test our assumptions, to try to explain things over again to ourselves. If you put in an honest effort, it makes our assumptions and ideas stronger, more reliable. Some people might even publish their ideas so that they can be tested in an environment of peer review. Just putting ideas down on paper forces one to really thing them through. You might even decide to put them into charts and a blog, to force your own performance to a higher standard. Interesting concept.