09 February 2009

When Will the Wall Street Money Center Banks Be Nationalized?


"Most of the big banks need to be put into some form of bankruptcy and recapitalized, and I think everybody understands that." Ken Rogoff

The major US money center banks will be nationalized. The only questions are when and how.

When is difficult. Rumours abound. A common rumour is for a bank holiday sometime around the President's day holiday in the US on February 16, or later in February.

This may be too early, but no matter. It is coming.

Its the how that is more interesting in terms of meaningful speculation and the impact on any intended recovery.

How will we nationalize the banks? How far will nationalization have to go?

With regard to nationalization the bank toadies and spin doctors say things like "Would you want the government running the banks?" Well, we think this is the usual deceptive rhetoric we get these days instead of serious discussion and hard news.

In a nationalization it is highly unlikely that the government will want to 'run the banks,' although it is hard to see how they could do a job that would be much worse than the overpaid princes of Wall Street who now stand exposed as having ruined the national economy through incredible dereliction of any standard of sound and responsible management.

Rather, there is a range the process which will be called nationalization.

If we hold the current course at some point the government will place enough capital and hold enough preferred stock in the banks to effectively own them, but passively. The problem with that is the mismanagement and losses will continue to deepen, and the government (public) will own the acid core of thirty years of white collar crime, burning a hole in the fabric of the national economy and monetary system.

It will be a financial Vietnam, with Larry Summers playing Robert McNamara and Obama as LBJ. It will be a cascade of corruption and deception and will tear the country apart.

At the other end of the nationalization spectrum, he government will 'take over' the bad banks as they did in the S&L crisis, and restructure them.

There are between five to ten banks in the country that are hopelessly insolvent through mismanagement bordering on fraud. At the moment they are sucking up capital at a ferocious rate through bailouts, and crowding out constructive uses of capital.

They cannot precipitously fail, but they can and should be taken into receivership by the FDIC, their books opened, their assets sold, debts written off, and the remains either buried peacefully or allowed to emerge as new banks with different management if there is enough left to make it respectable.

Who will lend? The regional banks. They are the bulwark of the banking system. It is in the money center banks where the contagion continually spawns.

To attempt to maintain the status quo is no longer possible, no matter how much money and influence and political power that the ten Wall Street banks may wield in Washington.

The shareholders will be effectively zeroed out as they should, the bondholders handed a steep haircut on the order of 40%, the creditors paid 70 cents on the dollar, if that.

Credit default swaps and other bets will be dealt with harshly. If a bank has a heavy interaction with a money center bank in Credit Default Swaps or other 'weapons of mass destruction' to the point where it places it insolvent guess what, it can join the restructuring club.

The depositors will be, MUST be, kept whole, to almost 100% on all private non-corporate deposits. Pensions must be kept whole above and beyond the limits of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

If the Congress, and this Administration, continued to bend the fate of this country to the bankers of Wall Street there will come a time when the people will simply say 'enough.' Of this we no longer have any doubt. And the pain from that will be much greater than the short term pain we will receive in restructuring the system now.

And it will be painful. But necessary. We do not have a cold. We do not have the flu or the sniffles, a temporary setback. We have a serious gangrenous infection that must be dealt with before it takes down the body politic.

We can choose to linger, to waste away in our corruption as Japan has done. But we do not think that the US public will accept the chains of servitude gracefully. They are too heavily equipped with options, thanks to the foresight of the founding fathers.

If this seems to harsh, too black and white, too unthinkable, here is a recent interview from Ken Rogoff with BBC Hardtalk to help punctuate the seriousness of the situation.

The simple truth is we no longer have any choice, any options. We elected the Obama Administration to reform Washington and the economic and political system in this country.

Ok guys. Reform.

The deeper we go down this rabbit hole the more difficult it will be to return to the light of day.

You may wish to take the time to listen to Ken Rogoff in this BBC interview on Hardtalk. Mr. Rogoff is a noted economist who is completing an intense study of financial crises.

We obviously do not agree with everything Ken Rogoff says. That would be improbable.

He starts from the assumption that we have free trade in the world today and should maintain it, whereas we believe that free trade went out the window with the devaluation and pegging of the Chinese renminbi in the 1990's, if not before that with aggressive Asian mercantilism supported by US multinationals and Wal-Mart.

But other than that, it sounds like the standard fare served at Le Café Américain for the past two years at least, and it is a happy and humbling experience to see someone express similar ideas with such gravitas.

It is clearly stated, it is well thought, and it is absolutely essential. It is what a substantive news program looks and sounds like. We rarely get anything like it except on the Web and on Public Television.

Rogoff on BBC HardTalk


GM to Invest $1 Billion of its US Rescue Package in Modernization - In Brazil


Here is a nice example of how investing in nationless corporations, without conditions, does very little for your use of capital and your good intentions. Because in fact the US rescue package was not an investment, but a grant. We do not investment our tax receipts in private corporations. We provide relief, grants, subsidization. If the investment was a good commercial arrangement it would not require your public assistance funds.

If General Motors wishes to upgrade its facilities in Brazil, it ought to seek the money from profit-seeking private investment, or from the government of Brazil.

And anyone who believes that General Motors should be able to do whatever they wish with a grant from the public treasury is a either a fool or a fraud. And that same measure applies doubly to the packages for the Wall Street banks which are as much bribe as bailout.

On a related topic, there is a significant amount of 'Smoot Hawley II,' anti-protectionist rubbish talk swilling around the webs. If free trade did exist as the norm then it would be a good thing to uphold it. As it is, rogue players have turned that into a farce.

The problem with the industrial policy of the US is that we do not have one, whereas several other powers do and follow it, aggressively.

We stand for 'free trade' where other countries manipulate their trade policies and currencies to advance mercantilism that happens to be favored by many US corporate powers in search of cheap labor and the circumvention of environmental, health, child labor, and assorted public reform policies.

Inevitably, and this is what the corporate spinmeisters do not wish you to know, is that unrestrained 'free trade' will conflict and be used to undermine domestic policy and civic standards to the lowest common denominator of human misery and exploitation in the world.

We are playing by the rules of soccer in a game of lacrosse.


Follow Up On February 10: GM has subsequently stated that the head of GM in Brazil was misquoted or mistaken, and that the billion dollars is coming from local sources.

GM Says Not Sending Any Money to Brazil

Latin American Herald Tribune
General Motors to Invest $1 Billion in Brazil Operations -- Money to Come from U.S. Rescue Program
By Russ Dallen

SAO PAULO -- General Motors plans to invest $1 billion in Brazil to avoid the kind of problems the U.S. automaker is facing in its home market, said the beleaguered car maker.

According to the president of GM Brazil-Mercosur, Jaime Ardila, the funding will come from the package of financial aid that the manufacturer will receive from the U.S. government and will be used to "complete the renovation of the line of products up to 2012."

"It wouldn't be logical to withdraw the investment from where we're growing, and our goal is to protect investments in emerging markets," he said in a statement published by the business daily Gazeta Mercantil.

Meanwhile, he cut the company's revenue forecast for this year by 14% to $9.5 billion from $11 billion, as the economic crisis began to cause rapid slowdowns in sales.

GM already announced three programs of paid leave, and Ardila added that GM Brazil "is going to wait and see how the market behaves in order to know what decision to take" with regard to possible layoffs.

For Ardila, the injection in Brazil's automobile sector of 8 billion reais ($3.51 billion) recently announced by the federal and state governments of Sao Paulo "has already begun to revive sales," which fell by 12% in October.

The executive said that the company will operate a "conservative" scenario in 2009 with an estimated production of 2.6 million units, and another more "optimistic" that contemplates sales of 2.9 million.

This year sales will reach 2.85 million vehicles, which represents a growth of 15% over last year.


Daily Gold Chart



07 February 2009

JP Morgan's Bonuses


This is an interesting essay from the Truth In Options blog. It raises issues of stealth bonuses to the JP Morgan executives and an interesting coincidence in stock price and option grants.

J.P. Morgan's Abusive Executive Bonuses

As readers will recall, J.P. Morgan received the first large bail-out from the New York FED of $55 Billion, guaranteed by Bear Stearns' worthless assets, to prop up its own liquidity position and buy Bear Stearns stock.

J.P. Morgan also recently received another $25 Billion in TARP payments from the Treasury.

This article is about how J.P. Morgan's executives , instead of receiving easy to detect cash bonuses, received very large bonuses in the form of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) and Restricted Stock Units. These equity compensation securities are not easy to understand or value by other than experts in the field....

Read the rest of this here: J.P. Morgan's Abusive Executive Bonuses