Federal Reserve Is Intervening in the Currency Markets While Wall Street Whines about Reform

I think we all already knew this, but I wanted to bookmark it on my site for some future occasion when the government and the Fed deny it, probably in a response to a question from Ron Paul.

The question I have in my mind is where does this show up on their books, and what other markets are they active in?

It also seems a bit ironic, since the current topic of discussion on Bloomberg TV is "investor trust in freefall?" The consensus of the talking heads is that Wall Street's holy men are under attack by evil governments, particularly those of the European persuasion, and the odd US regulatory agency.

Steve Wynn is gushing about the business friendly, stable atmosphere in the People's Republic of China, as opposed to the US and those anti-business fascists in Washington. Although it is funny that he thinks the place in the US that most closely resembles China for being 'business friendly' is Massachusetts because they are willing to give him tax guarantees for 15 years. I suppose that when you turn them upside down all corrupt oligarchies look alike.

In an email this morning my friend Janet T. dropped me a note about Vietnam's new bank friendly atmosphere, and wondered aloud if Jamie Dimon would take his operations to Ho Chi Minh City in the unlikely event that meaningful financial reform is passed in the US.

One can only hope. Should we take up a collection for airfare? I would love to see the terms of their bailout packages over there after the next financial crisis, which is sure to come. A water hose, bare steel bedsprings, copper jacketed ben wa balls, and a well charged car battery would probably serve for openers, instead of softball questions and false protests of indignation from Barney, Chris, and the boys which is what those meanies in the Congress frighten them with now.

German Econ Minister:
U.S. Fed Is Also Active In Currency Markets
By Roman Kessler

MAINZ, Germany -(Dow Jones)- The U.S. Federal Reserve is also active in currency markets, German Economics Minister Rainer Bruederle said Friday.

His comments come on the heels of remarks made by his Swiss counterpart who said that the Swiss National Bank purchased euros to buttress the single currency.

"It is a regular procedure of central banks," to intervene in currency markets, Bruederle said. "It is not a secret," that central banks have a foreign exchange rate target, he added.

Bruederle said "eruptive" movements have to be avoided. He previously said that China holds 25 percent of its foreign exchange reserves in euros.

-By Roman Kessler, Dow Jones Newswires, +49 69 2972 5514;

roman.kessler@dowjones.com

Read more: NASDAQ

SP 500 Daily Chart Looking Toppy, Regulators Looking Sloppy

The SP 500 Chart is looking rather 'toppy' here as the rally extends higher, running on monetary inflation and technical trading, squeezing the shorts.

Make no mistake, if enough specs try to front run this to the short side the hedge funds and Wall Street Banks like JPM can run it higher, since selling volume has not yet picked up. And the government and the Fed are only too happy to facilitate a reflating of a stock bubble as a means of 'soft' market intervention.

This is a factor in how the Banks are making their substantial trading revenues these days, in a return to leverage and subsidized regulatory and monetary easing. Although the example presented here is with regard to commodities and ETFs, the principle applies very well to stock index ETFs.

"Much of this happens because the government is too stupid to see the inherent conflict of interest in what a broker-dealer does. Regulation will not stop gaming the law. Ethics do, and not everybody has ethics. So best you can do is prevent situations of conflict of interest, like the existence of Broker-dealer type entities. Either you trade for yourself, or you trade for others. Period...

You can never know intentions, and no one is bigger than the market, but the consequences of a lack of transparency and the free reign in which banks can tell half-truths to investors is a big factor in enabling strong hands to fleece weak hands with little market risk. It’s all a con game."

In defense of the stupidity of government, quite a few economists, analysts, and even bloggers do not 'get' the inherent conflict of interests involved in the current structure of the broker dealers, or do not care to see it for a variety of personal reasons. Stupidity can often be willfully obtained, bu always for a price. Some of the arguments against financial reform that I have seen appear to be similar to arguments that would be in favor of armed robbery because it stimulates the velocity of money.

The inherent problem with the dealer playing his own hand at the same table with the players, using the house bankroll, and looking at the cards as he deals them, would seem to be pretty much common sense, unless the casino is staffed with very restrained and scrupulous individuals, and some uncommonly good regulators equipped with the right equipment and a willingness to use effective deterrents.

But Wall Street banking is about as bad as it gets when it comes to ethical considerations and self-restraint. The regulators are too busy surfing porn, and the top politicians like Rahm Emmanual are compromised by free wheeling financiers and outrageously weak campaign contributions laws. That is why these lunatics need a strait-jacket like Glass-Steagall. The culture of greed is epidemic and overcomes all other considerations.

So for an opportunity to short this market, wait for it.

And as for serious financial reform, the Republicans are as bad or even worse than the Democrats. Mitch McConnell makes Chris Dodd look like Mahatma Ghandi, so don't hold your breath.

Front Running the Fed In the Treasury Market

I had a friend from the old neighborhood who was Comptroller of a major casino in Las Vegas in 1970-80s, where I also was married in 1981. Only lasting win from there, ever.

According to this dour son of Italy the way he could spot a problem, besides the more aggressive methods of observation and detection, would be to examine the returns on a table basis. In the short run they will vary, but in the longer term each game will provide a statistical return that rarely deviates from the forecast, unless someone is cheating. We would walk through the casino, and he would point to a table game and say "at the end of the month, this table will bring in xx percent."

It was he who introduced me to Bill Friedman's book, Casino Management, which is a useful read if you wish to learn more about that end of the speculative business from the house perspective.

Attached is some information from a reader. I cannot assess its validity, not being in the bond trading business. But it does sound like someone has tapped into the Fed's buying plans to monetize the public debt and is front running those buys, essentially 'stealing' money from the public. Its what they call 'a sure thing.'

To try and figure out who might be doing it, I would look for some big player who is showing extraordinary returns on their trading, with consistent profit that is not statistically 'normal,' too consistently good. The problem with cheaters is that they sometimes get greedy and call attention to themselves.

In Las Vegas the bigger cheats were often taken out into the desert for further inquiry and final disposition. On Wall Street they are somewhat more arrogant and persistent, defying resolution with that ultimate defiance, "We'll just find other ways to cheat again."

Time for a trip to the desert?

Here are a reader's observations from the bond market.

From a reader:

I used to work for a BB on a prop desk until the financial crisis took hold and they fired the less senior guys on the desk. I now trade US Treasuries, for a small prop firm in xxxxx, to scalp basis trades in mostly on the run securities. Occasionally, I will also take position in the repo markets for off the runs if I see something "mispriced." Your recent article piqued my interest because we too have noticed "shenanigans," of sort, in the QE program of USTs.

What we noticed, especially in smaller issues like the 7 Year Cash is that before a Fed buy back would be announced the price would pop significantly as buyers would run through all the offers on two major electronic exchanges (BGC Espeed and ICAP BrokerTec). This occurred more than several times as the 7 Year Cash would be overvalued both by its BNOC by 20-30 ticks and its relative value to similar off the runs. This buyer(s) would lift every offer they could, driving the price substantially above its "value" for sometimes a week at a time. After this buying would occur, the Fed would then announce the purchase of that security sometimes a handle above its approximate value. This "luck" did not just occur in the on the run 7 Year sector, it also occurred in the 30 Year Cash, 3 Year Cash, and more than several off the runs. Again, it was especially prevalent in the less liquid treasury products. Often the "appetite" for these securities would begin approximately 2 weeks to 1 week before the official Fed announcement. The buying was well organized and done in such a way as to completely knock it off kilter from its relationship with like cash Treasuries and the CME Ten Year Contract. If you examine the charts of some of the selected buy backs before the official announcement, you will see a similar occurrence.

While I have not broken this down into a paper to prove it (and I see nothing positive coming out of contacting the ESS-EEE-SEE about this issue), I can assure you that it was occurring on a consistent basis across the entire curve.

A certain issuance would be bid up through the market (substantially above value, as derived by several metrics) only to be later gobbled up by the Fed at the unreasonable price. These player(s) had substantial pockets as we, the small guys (but with a decent capital base), would take the other side of what seemed to be an obvious fade. While this did not occur in every single issuance of the QE program, it occurred often enough to be obvious to any learned observer.

While I am not sure if this can be attributed to purposeful Fed policy or someone at the Fed talking to his pals, I am certain it transpired."

Corruption is inevitable when the government is engaged in manipulating the markets with public monies. That portion of the Fed's activities needs to be scrutinized by the GAO on a continual basis. And the activities of the Exchange Stabilization Fund and the Treasury in market intervention should be subject to review by the legislative branch on behalf of the people.

Of course another option is to keep the Fed and the Treasury out of the public markets altogether excepting short term interest rates and specifically identified emergencies.