SP 500 and NDX Futures Daily Charts - Policy Errors by Hacks, Par Excellence

Please see the gold/silver commentary above for my take on the FOMC statement.

Some called it a 'balanced statement.'

I considered it a muddied statement, with a little something for everyone.  This is not due to some serene objective wisdom on the part of the Fed.  Rather, they were purposely vague and misdirecting, in order to keep their options open, because they have no idea what they hell is going one or what they are doing.   As a default they are serving their masters in the Banks, that's all. 

They are, in the vernacular, 'scared shitless.'    And well they should be, since they are standing on a wreckage of their own devices.  And I doubt that there will be rooms for them at the compound in Paraguay.

By the end of the day, the fear trade dominated bonds and equities.  Stocks went out on their lows.

 

Perhaps some of the financial results from puffballs like Facebook will help to distract Wall Street from the gathering storm.

Changing the subject from vacuous statements by hacks about economic realities and policy that miss the mark, here is a link to an open letter that I posted today from the new Greek PM Alex Tsipras. It says much about modern economics and public policy that is worth noting well. You may read it here.

The Fed, and the fiscal authorities commonly known as policy making politicians in consultation with the corporate paymasters, are not only proving to be ineffective in nurturing The Recovery.

They are almost sociopathic in their pursuit of further misery and oppression of the public by propping up a financial system that is the cause of many of our current woes, because it is shamefully corrupt. And they wrap it all in bunkum, secrecy, and lies.

This will not end well. I just hope that out of all of this comes a renewal of the freedom, and a change in our priorities. But in the short term, as Yeats put it so well, 'the best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity.'

Have a pleasant evening.

 

 

 

 

 

The Fed's Forecasting Methodology: Making Astrology and Weathermen Look Good

 

European 'QE' In a Nutshell - Propagating the Western Trickle Down Policy Errors

This is about it in a nutshell.   'Stimulus' American style comes to Europe.

Printing money and giving it to your cronies inflates asset prices, lines the pockets of the well-heeled heels, but does little for the real economy.

 

But it doesn't produce broad inflation (or aggregate demand) so we can do it many times!    Success!

"At last the euro’s lords and masters have accepted that something must be done about their zone’s lamentable growth. They will unleash a massive bond-buying programme totalling a reported €1tn. The former BBC economic pundit Stephanie Flanders told the world it was “Santa Claus time”; the European Central Bank (ECB) has ridden to the rescue.

No it has not. Europe’s great and good, partying on the slopes of Davos, are like courtiers at the Congress of Vienna. They are blinded by snow and celebrities. Santa Claus gives presents to people; the ECB gives presents to its banks. It is merely tipping large sums of money into the vaults of precisely the institutions whose crazy lending caused the crash of 2008, and which have been failing Europe’s economy ever since.

Quantitative easing is a gigantic confidence trick. It was promised that it would yield new investment. It has not. It was promised that it would “pump money into the economy”. It has not. It was also feared that printing money would lead to hyper-inflation. It has not, for the simple reason that no one gets to spend the money. It is a bookkeeping transaction between a central bank and a commercial bank. It means nothing as long as banks are told to build up their reserves.

Money in circulation matters. The whole of Europe, including Britain, is chronically short of demand, which is why deflation is such a menace. If no one can afford to buy anything, no one will sell anything or invest money in making anything..."

Simon Jenkins, QE for the eurozone is a gigantic confidence trick. It should fool no one

What 2000, 2008 and 2015 May Have In Common

'As a dog returns to its vomit, so the fool repeats their folly.'

Proverbs 26:11

 

And they do it about every seven or eight years, it seems, in the modern economic discipline of bubblenometry.

 

What hath the Fed wrought, and the crony accomplices to Wall Street in the Administration and Congress?

Back to the brink, again.  Crouching dangers, hidden risks.

 

Margin Debt as a percent of GDP is flashing a warning sign as shown in the first chart from Cross-Currents.net.

And the second chart shows that a second indicator could be seen in the stock market performance for the first three days of trading in January, in a chart from Kimblechartingsolutions.com.

 

As the upper left corner of the second chart reminds us, these 'predictions' are forecasts, with a nod to life's school of probability. 

 

I will like to see what happens for the full month of January for a confirmation, before we start warming up the bear train for a trip downtown.   And let's not forget the bubble-making propensities of the keepers of the world's reserve currency, in the age of weaponized finance.   Triumphant exceptionalism does not wear a pauper's rags well, although it is perfectly acceptable dress for the trickle down underclass.

 

This will likely end badly, but timing is always problematic since these breakdowns most often involve a trigger event, or a black swan.  But the system is hardly robust, and so the risks are high.

 

But all in all, as George Takei would say, Oh my.

 

Related:   Margin Debt To GDP Highest in 85 Years

US Power Elite: An Echo Chamber of Illusions, Delusions, and Subsequent Policy Errors

"A monopoly on the means of communication may define a ruling elite more precisely than the celebrated Marxian formula of monopoly in the means of production."

Robert Anton Wilson

I watched the latter part of a televised discussion called Surveillance 2015 which included Sallie Krawchek, Mohamed El-Erian, Sheila Bair, and Mario Gabelli with Tom Keane as host at the high-toned, dark-wooded drinking salon in the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City.

 

There is no one in the discussion that you could dislike, as they are all affable and intelligent people who are most likely very good company at a cocktail party and acknowledged as subject matter experts in their own areas.

 

I may have missed the first part where hopefully they discussed some things that they understand, like the workings of the US markets, although that is no guarantee of a frank and open discussion. Or maybe I was spared the usual self-congratulatory success fest.  Mission accomplished, and all that.

 

But the groupthink when it came to discussing global events was absolutely stunning in its glib triumphalism and selective shallowness.

 

Their read on Putin and the situation with Russia was almost sad in its cartoon like shallowness.  Russia is on the ropes, and it is just a question whether Putin folds now, or does something stupid to distract his people, like cutting off the energy to Europe and driving them into recession. The odds are fifty- fifty.

 

But the US is pristine, above it all, the global puppet master.   Exceptional and winning!

 

I think that pat description of Russia with an economy that is on the edge, with the option to do something stupid to take the peoples' minds off their misery, fits Obama and the new Congress just as well as Russia.  The difference is that we are seeing things from within the dollarsphere of wealth illusion.

 

How can one discussion the global situation without getting around to including China until at the very end, almost as an afterthought?   And to discuss Russia's options without including China and a few other emerging countries which is still where the growth remains?  At least real growth in building infrastructure and actual products, instead of just overcharging each other for healthcare and financial services and calling it growth?

 

Part of the problem I am sure is that we are given to the phenomenon of mistaking wealth for intelligence, and on subjects in which the person has little to no expertise beyond that which an intelligent person who read newspapers and magazines might gather.  There is quite a bit of that going around.  Traders and bureaucrats making policy calls is like watching a fox hunt, to paraphrase Oscar Wilde:  the unspeakable in full pursuit of the indigestible.

 

When the US gets blindsided next year, and I think it is more like 75-25 that they will, it is will be because the power elite in the US is living in an echo chamber of their own thoughts, sharing a distorted vision of their own country, not to mention the world, from the cocoons of Washington and New York City.

 

When they do the wrong things, and respond clumsily and ineffectively again and again, we should have no confusion about why they are doing so.   They are marching to the beat of a very different drummer. 

 

What a brave new world, that is so dangerously out of touch with the shared reality of their fellows, and the rest of the world. 

 

 

 

Stock Valuations Outrunning Profits Growth - And the Band Played On

"We are still amazed by the chart [below], but it summarises the problem for those seeking to short stocks with fundamental weaknesses. In the last three years, the MSCI World Index has risen by 38% (11% per annum) whilst reported profits have risen by just 3% (that’s just 1% per annum!). As the events of last month attest, central bank actions–not profits–are driving equities forward."

Andrew Lapthorne, Societe General

This quote is in reference to the first chart below that shows stock prices are outrunning profit growth.   The second chart is the Shiller PE 10 Ratio for US stocks.

Beside the corrupting influence of Big Money on politics and academics, the other pervasive problem in our society is really quite banal, that is, mindlessly managing to the numbers.

Although incentives have always been an issue, in the last thirty years it has become quite fashionable in modern management theory to set a few relatively narrow metrics and judge the performance and rewards of a manager by them and them alone.

While this is not wrong in and of it self, such a philosophy provides a source of great mischief if the metrics are excessively narrow, and therefore obscure the bigger picture and the health of an organization, a company, or even a nation.

I think we are all familiar with how incentives badly designed can drive counter-productive, short term behavior that can actually be destructive of the values of an organization.  I cannot think of a better recent example, other than the widespread fraud and corruption on Wall Street, than the manner in which the Central Banks and their governments are managing The Recovery™.

If employment is a metric, let us foster an economy in which a large number of jobs are created, that are low paying and part time, in order to address the metric of unemployment.  Never mind that this ignores the real reason for concern, ie, the lack of jobs at living wages which will spur aggregate demand.   If unemployment is the only concern, why not just bring back indentured servitude and give everyone a job at below subsistence wages.  Not far off the Japan model at that.

If inflation is a metric, let us follow policies of money printing in order to raise the prices of goods.  Unfortunately this will have price inflation running ahead of the ability of the broad public to pay for the things that they need through wage and income growth.  

See, there is no deflation.  It doesn't matter to the model that the growth in prices is not only artificial, but is in fact increasing the misery of the people by diluting their already reduced incomes with which to purchase necessities.

Now, this would seem to insult common sense.  But in fact if you are a bureaucrat under pressure to please a powerful constituency, and are driven to pursue policies that really do not make sense by any reasonable estimation of 'the public good,' it is tempting to stand fast on your models, and insist that one cannot prove that you are not doing a good job of it. 

 

And it is all so easy to claim well intentioned ignorance, or a lack of relevancy to your responsibilities.  There were executives at Enron who were so incapable, who knew and did so little, that it was a marvel that they were not in nursing homes.

When pressed you can always use discredited theories and perception management to quell those who are calling out the contrariness, at times to the point of madness, of your policy actions.  Prove to me it is a bubble!  Prove to me that people are not just lazy, or incapable of doing useful work!  Prove to me that giving trillions to the Banks is not sound monetary policy.

 

What does it matter, if your bosses are happy, and the perks and prestige, and all important access to the halls of power, are ensured.  At times your conscience may be troubled by the thought that in some of your actions you may have gone too far, and committed acts that could be considered outside of the law.  But you have done it for the good of the system, after all. 

And in that you are above the law, a law maker, not a follower.  A bonus or promotion, or some other visible reward or recognition, may quiet your conscience and concerns.  You are only doing what must be done, as demanded by those who deserve to be followed and obeyed. 

 

You see the excesses, by the really bad ones, but you are not like them.  Some day when you have the power you will set things right, but you must stay within the system to obtain that power.  So you must steel yourself, and be practical, and do what must be done. 

 

And that is easier to do, when there is no metric for human misery and suffering.  The unfortunate are easy to ignore.  No one wishes to see them, or hear them.  And they have little power.

You work hard, and are only human after all.  And for this you are a very important person, well regarded in the Capitol.  You are making money for yourself and your friends, the people who really count.  You are a success!  And all is right with your world.

"When virtue is lost, benevolence appears, when benevolence is lost right conduct appears, when right conduct is lost, expediency appears. Expediency is the mere shadow of right and truth; it is the beginning of disorder."

Lao Tzu

 

No one sits down one day and decides, 'I shall become a monster, and do monstrous things.'

 

And the band played on.

h/t Zerohedge

Shiller PE Ratio

Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - Will the Fed Ever Learn?

"They will act in accord with the proverbs, 'that a dog will return to his own vomit; and the sow that was washed will go back to her wallow in the mud.'"

2 Peter 2:21-22

No. The Fed will not learn. 

The Fed will keep repeating their policy errors because they are well paid not to learn.  And the economic bobble heads will keep agreeing with them and rationalizing their failures.  This is the judicious thing to do if you wish to succeed in a disgraced profession,  trafficking in expedient fantasies that may last as long as everyone that matters agrees with them.

The Fed wishes for the ECB and the other central banks to do dumb things like they and some of their friends are doing so that they all do the same dumb things together.  There is safety in numbers apparently.  Hey, we all did dumb things out of good intentions.  Who could have known?  No one saw the bubble coming.   No one could have known that what we were doing was making things worse. 

It worked for Greenspan.  And it's working for the Banks.

The Fed is a creature of the Banks.   Its members are all members of the same 'Club.'   They are from the ranks of the financial demimonde, and their livelihoods and privileges are supplied by the financial-political complex.

Insiders never speak ill of insiders. And whistleblowers and reformers are left at the curb. Or tossed under a bus.

As a regulator the Fed is one of the worst possible choices, just a quarter step removed from pure 'self-regulation' by the Banks.  The Fed acts as their proxies and manservants. 

 

The recent tapes of NY Fed meetings with Goldman are no surprise, except perhaps to those who live in an illusion of morally superior technocrats, ruling wisely with perfect virtue, cloaked in their models and jargon.  And of course, you have no need to know, and could not understand it if you did.

I'm sorry, but this is just not how things are in the real world.   The US and UK are caught in an awful credibility trap, and are destined to suffer stagnation and growing inequality until reform comes.  And as we have seen in the case of Japan, that can be a very long time.

Speaking of things that make you go what the heck?, on CNBC this morning the assertion was that 'the gold market is not driven by supply and demand. It only responds to fear and greed.'  That is, it's only fundamental basis is emotion.

And you know what? In the West, in London and New York, that's true. 

The gold and silver markets have the depth and substance of a game of Liar's poker. They are rigged, like most of the other markets with global consequences have been.  The precious metals market hasn't been cleaned up yet because the pinheads who are running the scam have no real track record or experience in trading physical commodity markets. 

 

They think they can keep leasing out what isn't theirs and leveraging up ad infinitum, without ever incurring any real world consequences.  And the Banks are perfectly willing to take their cuts because they are covered with plausible deniability, just following orders. 

But this divergence from reality is not the case everywhere. Certainly not in the Asian and Mideastern markets where some accountability still exists, and delivery tends to imply taking possession.

And in that convergence of these two markets, the physical and the paper, there is both risk and opportunity. When the reckoning comes it is likely to be quite impressive.

There will be a Non-Farm Payrolls report on Friday.

The Comex Delivery Report for Friday is late, as if it is about anything that is actually delivered anywhere but on paper.  There was the usual moving around the plate in the silver bullion warehouses.  Gold was a snoratorium.

There is speculation now by the economists about when wage inflation will return. They are looking at 2015 for it.

I would point to the Japanese experience of 3.6% unemployment, at least on paper, and a massive underemployment running about 40%, with general wage stagnation and a large portion of the population struggling along on near subsistence wages. 

Tell me again what is going to change to allow Labour to demand higher wages from a system totally dominated by two political parties both paid to represent the moneyed interests, driven by an insatiable greed for more? 

Change will come, but not from within.

 

 Something will have to happen to bring people back to their senses, and put some humility and a sense of obligation and proportion back into the masters of the universe.  I won't go so far as to suggest a sense of shame.  Perhaps just respect, if not for the law, then for justice.

 

What that will be I do not know.

Have a pleasant evening.

 

Related:  Criminal Investigation Into JP Morgan's Currency Trading

 

 

For Whom Are the Japanese Leaders Kuroda and Abe Making Their Monetary and Fiscal Policy?

The expansion of the BOJ asset purchase program was timed to start with the end of the Fed's asset purchase program.  I mean, come on.  Could it have been any more obvious?

There is no big question that the Bank of Japan has been acting in concert with the Fed for the better part of this century at least.  And politically, Japan is a client state of the US.

One of the great difficulties in recovering from the long period of Japanese economic stagnation since the collapse of their great real estate and stock market bubble has been the inability to clean up their interlocking financial system dominated by industrial combines called keiretsus and a closely associated political system run by a surprisingly well connected minority of insiders.

Beyond that I wondered why was Japan pursuing the purchase not only of domestic equities and non-sovereign paper, but foreign equities as well with their very large pension fund?  Are these intended as 'investments?'  Or are they a form of cross subsidies in support of a more global agenda?

It makes me wonder if the policy being pursued by the BOJ is not designed to help the people of Japan now, so much as to support the requests of the international banking concerns, more specifically the US Federal Reserve.

This made me wonder if Kuroda is pursuing the same type of trickle down stimulus in buying large amounts of financial paper by printing money, rather than engaging in policy actions to stimulate aggregate demand.

And there is that nasty consumption tax hike in April which tends to have a regressive effect on lower income households.  A weak yen is good for the exporters and multinationals, but is hard on small businesses and consumers. 

Although the Japanese GINI coefficient for economic equality is lower than that of the US, in terms of power Japan is a very top heavy, insider dominated society.   Their incorporation of University pedigrees into the success ladder would make the Ivy League envious.

Here is a thoughtful discussion of Japanese quantitative easing from just a few weeks ago from Sober Look.   As you can see, the consensus was running heavily against an expansion, making the surprise from BOJ the day after the Fed taper even more of a surprise.

"With wage growth remaining sluggish (particularly for non-union workers), rising import costs could undermine consumer demand - particularly in the face of higher consumption taxes. Given these headwinds, there may be sufficient political pressure to put the BoJ into a holding pattern."

I am not sure of all the specifics of what is happening in Japan, but I am becoming increasingly persuaded that the Anglo-American financial cartel and some of its client states are engaging in an intensifying currency war with regard to the international dominance of the dollar.

This extends not only to the dollar as the primary benchmark for international valuations, but also to the more compelling power that such an instrument, in the hands of a single governmentally affiliated entity, provides to those who wield it to set international and domestic policies that go far beyond mere terms of trade. 

 

So I think it is fair to ask for whom the Bank of Japan and their political leadership are making some of their policy decisions.  And further, it is incredibly naïve not to ask the same questions about the Federal Reserve and the political leadership of the US.

Money power is political power, in every sense of the word. 

Employment In Japan

It has been quite some time since I have been doing business in Japan, and I was curious to know if the culture of the 'salary man' had changed.  What is the employment picture in Japan really like for the average person?   What are things like behind the statistics put forward in the international press?

While unemployment in Japan is very low at 3.6% or so and the Labor Participation Rate is still fairly high, it looks like 'underemployment' might be something worth looking at given the slack in wage growth.  Certainly Japan is experiencing deflation, but is that a 'cause' or an effect as part of some other economic feedback loop? 

What happened to the NAIRU non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment theory?  It is the theory put forward by Friedman and the monetarists that refers to a level of unemployment below which inflation must rise due to wage pressures.   Personally I think the growth of monopolies, the globalization of markets, and the relative political weakness of labor has knocked another dodgy economic theory into a cocked hat.

Places like the old South might have had nearly full employment, but I don't think slavery was adding seriously to wage pressures. Quite the contrary. But it may have put pressure on selective prices, like transport, whips, and chains for repression.  But this is just my opinion and I could be wrong.

Sometimes it is not always easy to find things because people tend to be very positive about their country, especially when speaking with others.  And I dislike looking at OECD statistics and other compendiums because they tend to lose quite a bit with time lag and a lack of insight past government statistics which, and I know this is hard to believe, tend to paint a pretty picture.

But I did get this in from a long time friend in Japan.

"It is difficult for many young people who are part-time or temporary, particularly the men. It is hard for them to "attract" a mate. Many couples are both employed but when they have children there is pressure to find a nursery and often times the wife cannot return to her former job. This obviously complicates the demographic conundrum. Although I do not have figures, this sort of conversation comes up even on the TV.

This is from JIJI dot com. Sorry but Japanese.

The chart shows average monthly salary after subtracting inflation for 2013 having dropped 0.5%.

According to the latest government statistics there are 33.1 million "full time employed" (seiki shain) and 20.4 million "part-time" (hi-seiki shain).

This means that the hi-seiki  非正規 or part-time/temporary account for 38% of the work force.

You can see the numbers I quote "3311" and "2042" in the second line of the page linked below.

Japanese Internal Affairs and Communication Ministry

Note:  Hi-seiki refers to any type of employment other than full-benefit employee of a company. I have also seen figures that suggest 40% of those employed earn an average of less than 3 million yen  (about $26,710 per year at current exchange rates).

Jesse's Note:

There is an English tab on the site, but unfortunately the tab goes to a different site and does not 'match up' with the Japanese page.

Here is a google translation of the relevant line on the page. 

Heisei "regular staff and employees" of the October time year 24 33,110,000 people, "non-regular staff and employees" is 20,420,007 thousand (Excel: 2985KB)