Senator Levin: Fed Enabled Banks To Elbow Way Into Commodities, Manipulate Prices

Apparently Senator Levin is not expecting many $250,000 speaking engagements from Wall Street after he leaves the Senate.

The Wall Street Banks have NO business using their subsidized banking funds and deposits to speculate in global markets for their own accounts.

This was the basic safeguard provided by Glass-Steagall for almost sixty years that was overturned in a bipartisan political effort at gettin' paid.

US Senator Carl Levin Opening Statement, Day Two

"The Federal Reserve is considering arguments that Wall Street banks provide hard-to-replace services in these areas. But the separation between banking and commerce has served markets and our economy quite well for decades. And the erosion of that barrier is clearly doing harm today.

Any discussion of these physical commodities activities must begin and end with the need to protect our economy from risk, our markets from abuse and our consumers from the effects of both.

Wall Street banks with near-zero borrowing costs, thanks to easy access to Fed-provided capital, have used that advantage to elbow their way into commodities markets.

Bad enough that this competitive advantage hurts traditional commercial businesses; worse that it opens the door to price and market manipulation and abusive trading based on nonpublic information."

Read the entire statement here.

Plutarch, De Superstitiones 171

... but with full knowledge and understanding they themselves offered up their own children, and those who had no children would buy little ones from poor people and cut their throats as if they were so many lambs or young birds; meanwhile the mother stood by without a tear or moan; but should she utter a single moan or let fall a single tear, she had to forfeit the money, and her child was sacrificed nevertheless; and the whole area before the statue was filled with a loud noise of flutes and drums took the cries of wailing should not reach the ears of the people.

HFT: 60 Minutes Sanitizes Its Report - What Banks, What Exchanges?

There were some gaping holes in the 60 Minutes expose about the stock market being rigged. The story was spun in such a way to make one think that uncontrolled innovation had created some unfortunate and inadvertent technical arbitrage opportunities in exchange centers outside of Manhattan, but a clever insider, funded in part by ultimate insider David Einhorn and backed by the big dogs of Wall Street, had come up with a clever technical fix in a new and better exchange called IEX.  Protected by a spool of fiber to induce network latency.  

 Free market triumphs, mission accomplished.   And wait breathlessly for the IPO.

Don't even think about a minimum transaction tax, a speed bump rule such as a minimum order duration, or anything more comprehensive than that. A spoolful of fiber makes the medicine go down.

I was so enchanted that they allowed someone to say 'the stock market is rigged' on national television that I thought that giving it a day or two to sink in might be appropriate.  And it is rigged.  It is just not fixed, in the manner of genuine reforms.  It is a laughingstock amongst insiders. Well not everyone is laughing.

What was this 60 minutes piece, a limited hangout expose that will still be boldly and hotly denied? 

The Fight Today That Stopped Floor Trading on the NYSE

"How frightened hypocrisy hastens to defend itself."

Victor Hugo

What is coming down the road, another flash crash or a major market failure?  Or are the natives just getting restless?  Look, reform!  And it was self-regulating!  The major owner and executive chairman of CBS, Sumner Redstone, of the aptly named holding company National Amusements, could not have asked for a better script.

If you did not notice, they parsed HFT into two types.  Conventional HFT that rides on the bid ask, normally in small incremental orders, aimed at skimming and carving up the smaller orders of the retail investors.  What INEX is addressing is 'front running' HFT that games lags between exchanges to jump in front of BIG orders from powerful insiders. 

Never mind the front running, which was taking a bite from the pros,  how about the steady nibble at the bid and ask on virtually every order that is being placed?   Doesn't anyone remember the computerized transactional skimming in the movie Office Space? 

NY AG Eric Schneiderman himself praised mom and pop affecting HFT as 'providing liquidity.' I think that canard has been capably debunked in many places and much better than I can do. It is like sex in college. The kind of liquidity you get you don't want, and when you desperately need even that liquidity, its not there. Why not just praise portfolio insurance to abolish risk, and party like its 1987?

And what about the bombing of quiet markets with an avalanche of orders to brazenly manipulate the price?  We have indictments of American companies doing that from Europe to Japan, with the sexy title 'Dr. Evil strategy.'   And it is happening like clockwork, almost every day.

And as the king of Samoan metals traders, Salelologa Dave said, 'I’ll know that real change is coming to our system when the Government allows Sixty Minutes to discuss the manipulation of the gold market."

And brother, that is the truth. We can't even get the CFTC to disclose its five year study of manipulation in the silver market that we paid for.

60 Minutes Sanitizes Its Report on High Frequency Trading
By Pam Martens
April 1, 2014

Two of the chief culprits of aiding and abetting high frequency traders, the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq stock exchange, failed to come under scrutiny in the much heralded 60 Minutes broadcast on how the stock market is rigged.

This past Sunday night, 60 Minutes’ Steve Kroft sat down with noted author Michael Lewis to discuss his upcoming book, “Flash Boys,” and its titillating revelations about how high frequency traders are fleecing the little guy.

Kroft says to Lewis: “What’s the headline here?” Lewis responds: “Stock market’s rigged. The United States stock market, the most iconic market in global capitalism is rigged.”

Kroft then asks Lewis to state just who it is that’s rigging the market. (This is where you need to pay close attention.) Lewis responds that it’s a “combination of these stock exchanges, the big Wall Street banks and high-frequency traders.” We never hear a word more about “the big Wall Street banks” and no hint anywhere in the program that the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq are involved.

60 Minutes pulls a very subtle bait and switch that most likely went unnoticed by the majority of viewers. In something akin to its own “Flash Boys” maneuver, it flashes a photo of the floor of the New York Stock Exchange as Kroft says to the public that: “Michael Lewis is not talking about the stock market that you see on television every day. That ceased to be the center of U.S. financial activity years ago, and exists today mostly as a photo op.”

That statement stands in stark contrast to the harsh reality that the New York Stock Exchange is one of the key facilitators of high frequency trading and making big bucks at it....

Read the entire piece with the details here.

The 'Stock Market Is Rigged' and an Epidemic of Fraud

You have probably heard by now that the popular US news magazine style program 60 Minutes carried a segment interviewing Michael Lewis about his new book last night. In it Lewis says that the 'US Stock Market is rigged,' referring to the front running of basic price data taking place with the cooperation of 'the exchanges, the banks, and the traders' in order to regularly cheat large institutional and fund investors on their stock transactions.

You may rightly say that this is nothing new. You have heard about this new type of organized and systemically arranged 'front running' here and other places on the web many times over the past five years. And there were people who had been interviewed, occasionally but not so much of late, on some of the financial news networks complaining about it.

This morning NY AG Eric Schneiderman was interviewed about the investigation he is conducting on Bloomberg TV. Schneiderman was quite politic, praising HFT itself as 'providing liquidity' and pointing to some of the trading firms grasping for milliseconds of advantage as some sort of misguided bad apples.

The lady anchor on the show who questioned him was quite adamant that is it the fault of the regulators for allowing it to happen. She likened these Wall Street traders to her children, who are constantly looking for ways to circumvent her rules, and the shame is on her when they succeed.

I don't think the anchor really understood what she was saying in that awful comparison. These are not children, in the morally formative stage of relative innocence. They are adults, with tremendous advantages and often in positions of power, who have often taken oaths and fiduciary responsibilities. And they too often violate them, and twist the laws to escape responsibility, shamelessly.

This is the unspoken entitlement of the privileged class, the price of their naturally beneficial role in society, that is, the entitlement of being above the law, because they are so special, and so legally advantaged and well connected.   This is the twisted reincarnation of class and racial arrogance,  the one percent's burden of bringing order and direction to its social and genetic inferiors.

Well, that is the moral hazard of excusing Wall Street's criminal thefts, of giving a slap on the wrist when they are caught lying, cheating and stealing, of believing canards like the exchanges are responsible and self-regulating, and ignoring the key role that they and the Banks play in enabling widespread fraud and financial plunder.

Why do people ever listen to those apologists for financial fraud, who dismiss all accusations of market manipulation as mere conspiracy talk? Yes they are skillful in creating doubt, and since all fraud is founded on the hiding and control of information, there is always room for doubt.

Perhaps the worst of this is that 60 Minutes and other are willfully ignoring the power of money in silencing regulators, cutting their budgets, and using political influence to kill their attempts at enforcing the law by corrupting the political process.

Complicating matter, the Federal Reserve has taken the policy of shoving manufactured liquidity into the system through these very Wall Street banks and their exchanges, who are taxing the stimulus like warlords who take Red Cross aid for themselves, allowing a trickle of them to go to the intended recipients. This 'trickle down' approach by the entitled is a sick joke, because it continues robbing the public to pamper the privileged few.

And anytime a whistleblower steps forward, they are smeared and charged with crimes. What a world we are giving to our children, who we apparently teach by our words and example that breaking the rules is a fine art, and that justice is a poorly defined and highly debatable abstract concept. And the truth is merely what we say it is, if we say it well enough, and have enough powerful people and credentialed experts to back us up. Whatever 'is' might mean.

And there are other frauds still going on, like the blatant manipulation of the futures markets with large scale buying and dumping of positions in quiet markets to shove the price around, with regulators turning a blind eye to it. As long as the exchanges, the biggest traders, and the politicians are getting their piece of the action, nothing will be done about it. But such actions have real world consequences.

Old story, always with a bad ending.

Ted Butler: J. P. Morgan And Precious Metal Price Manipulation On the Comex

I am no legal expert, and therefore have no idea of the merits of this as a prospective case.  The law involves things like intent, opportunity, evidentiary proof, and so forth. Apparently one can sue another entity for just about anything, but that does not mean that the case has any merit.   And I certainly could not advance such a case based on even industry knowledge. That strikes to the heart of my own issue.

My primary concern is a lack of transparency. And that lack of transparency in these markets is not conducive to market efficiency.  It allows for gaming the system, either occasionally or, as we have seen, systematically.

I cannot tell if these markets are manipulated because so much of what is being done is hidden.  And it does not help that the CFTC conducted a five year long study into the subject, and then quietly killed it without ever having issued any information about their findings.

Some have shown evidence they say that proves that it is the tech funds that set price, and that JPM is just 'making a market.' If this is true, then additional transparency on the part of JPM and the other market makers would be perfectly reasonable to allay any doubts about the honesty and fairness of the markets for precious metals.  This is why the people have established, and paid for, regulators.  So they do not have to resort to lawsuits in order to achieve justice and equity in their transactions.

Considering the widespread rigging of key benchmarks and prices, I think to just dismiss these concerns with a sneer and a snigger is unreasonable, requiring people to maintain an almost slavish belief in the integrity of the Banks, trading desks, and the system.  Given the amount of abuse that has been exposed already along these same lines, that does not seem to be a thing that a thinking person would ask.

The major objection to transparency, by the way, is that it would diminish the profits of those in the position of market makers.  Well, market making is intended to be a utility function, with a small but regular return.  It is not appropriate for market making to be in the hands of those who are also major market players.  It is a certain invitation to corruption.

One of the more general things that struck home in this commentary by Ted is the concern that the Comex is becoming like a bucket shop, a betting parlor that is at arms length from the markets for which they are presumably setting prices.   The lack of delivery and the ability to create large amounts of contracts to receive or deliver on the fly, and then to transact them at whatever price you wish without seeming constraint if you are big enough, with deep enough pockets and enough advantageous information, is tantamount to setting up a con game, and then trusting in men to be angels.

Relying on self-regulation, under the discipline of private lawsuits, merely reinforces our increasingly bifurcated society, in which a small minority have ease and rights and freedom and even justice, because they can afford it.  And those many who rely on the justice provided by government will be faced with an upward facing and unresponsive bureaucracy, and with that, hard times.  Like quality Healthcare, there will be Justice, for some.

As you know I am no longer hopeful of change in the short term, given the nature of the credibility trap that has encompassed the political party process and the mainstream media. To paraphrase the discouragement pessimism of Czech author and political figure Václav Havel:

“No attempt at reform could ever hope to set up even a minimum of resonance in the rest of society, because that society is ‘soporific,’ submerged in a consumer rat race... Even if reform were possible, however, it would remain the solitary gesture of a few isolated individuals, and they would be opposed not only by a gigantic apparatus of national (and supranational) power, but also by the very society in whose name they were mounting their reform in the first place.”

It is no accident that the nascent movements for financial reform were either ruthlessly crushed, as in the case of the almost rudderless Occupy Wall Street, or co-opted by money and politics, as unfortunately happened with the Tea Party. Co-opt if you can, crush if you must.

Ted presents some of the facts in the contrary case, and I found them to be interesting.  It is hard to believe that the London Fix is so corrupt, but the Comex, which is the major pricing platform, is pristine, since the players are playing across all global markets.

Suing JPMorgan and the COMEX
Theodore Butler|
March 21, 2014

I’ve had some recent conversations with attorneys who were considering class-action lawsuits regarding a gold price manipulation stemming from reports about the London Gold Fix. I told them that while there is no doubt that gold and, particularly, silver are manipulated in price, I didn’t see how the manipulation stemmed from the London Fix. I wished them well and hoped that they may prevail (the enemy of my enemy is my friend), because you never know – if the lawyers dig deep enough they might find the real source of the gold and silver manipulation, namely, the COMEX (owned by the CME Group) and JPMorgan.

So I thought it might be constructive to lay out what I thought a successful lawsuit might look like, although I’m speaking as a precious metals analyst and not as a lawyer. I’ll try to put the whole thing into proper perspective, including the premise and scope of the manipulation as well as the parties involved...

Read the entire article for free here.

SP 500 Futures Intraday - You Can't Follow the Opera Without a Libretto

This is from my post earlier today at 11:17 AM.

"I may adjust my outlook if the September SP 500 futures do not hold at 1518 which is the 50% Fibonacci retracement level. Right now we are at 1553 which is about a 38.2% retracement from the highly controlled, almost straight line rally that began at the beginning of the year."

Here is what the futures market looks like now in the chart below.   This market is trading on the technicals. 

Technicals is sometimes a euphemism for calculated insider manipulation, as in a 'wash and rinse.' You convince the small investor to get in despite their fears at some higher price, and then one pulls the rug out from under them since the entire rally has been manufactured, and buy the same paper back on the cheap, thereby skinning them once again.

Some of this is herd instinct with the smaller traders, but the big dogs at the Banks and funds are setting the tone in this trade with all the passion of a McCormick reaper.

This is the norm for deregulated or under-regulated markets, a far cry from the 'efficient markets theory' which is a canard. This was standard operating procedure in the 1920's before reforms were introduced.

If you do not believe this happens, if you do not believe that traders signal each other of their intentions, if you do not know that the big trading desks watch the structure of the market as in who is holding what and then act on it,  if you do not understand that the financial sector is being recapitalized by looting the real economy,  then you may be either a shill for the house, witting or not, or one of the suckers at the table.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

Upton Sinclair

We may have more downside to the 50% retracement, and it could be more IF something real happens.  That means something real, something fundamental, and not a manufactured event off some mild Fed jawboning. 

But in my opinion everything that has occurred since Bernanke's non-statement last week has been the second act in this opera buffo known as the US financial markets. 

Matt Taibbi: Everything Is Rigged - The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever

“The worst crimes were dared by a few, willed by more, and tolerated by all.”

Tacitus

There are more scandals to come.   Wall Street is now a pathological environment, and the City of London is as bad or worse.

When someone raises their voice over these abuses they are often met with stony denial and ridicule.  That is the credibility trap at work.  Those who owe their positions to the system, as corrupt as it may be, feel the need to defend it rather than reform it.

There will be no sustainable recovery until the system is reformed.  

Rolling Stone
Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever
By Matt Taibbi
April 25, 2013

Conspiracy theorists of the world, believers in the hidden hands of the Rothschilds and the Masons and the Illuminati, we skeptics owe you an apology. You were right. The players may be a little different, but your basic premise is correct: The world is a rigged game. We found this out in recent months, when a series of related corruption stories spilled out of the financial sector, suggesting the world's largest banks may be fixing the prices of, well, just about everything.

You may have heard of the Libor scandal, in which at least three – and perhaps as many as 16 – of the name-brand too-big-to-fail banks have been manipulating global interest rates, in the process messing around with the prices of upward of $500 trillion (that's trillion, with a "t") worth of financial instruments. When that sprawling con burst into public view last year, it was easily the biggest financial scandal in history – MIT professor Andrew Lo even said it "dwarfs by orders of magnitude any financial scam in the history of markets."

That was bad enough, but now Libor may have a twin brother. Word has leaked out that the London-based firm ICAP, the world's largest broker of interest-rate swaps, is being investigated by American authorities for behavior that sounds eerily reminiscent of the Libor mess. Regulators are looking into whether or not a small group of brokers at ICAP may have worked with up to 15 of the world's largest banks to manipulate ISDAfix, a benchmark number used around the world to calculate the prices of interest-rate swaps...

All of these stories collectively pointed to the same thing: These banks, which already possess enormous power just by virtue of their financial holdings ­ in the United States, the top six banks, many of them the same names you see on the Libor and ISDAfix panels, own assets equivalent to 60 percent of the nation's GDP ­ are beginning to realize the awesome possibilities for increased profit and political might that would come with colluding instead of competing. Moreover, it's increasingly clear that both the criminal justice system and the civil courts may be impotent to stop them, even when they do get caught working together to game the system.

If true, that would leave us living in an era of undisguised, real-world conspiracy, in which the prices of currencies, commodities like gold and silver, even interest rates and the value of money itself, can be and may already have been dictated from above. And those who are doing it can get away with it. Forget the Illuminati ­ this is the real thing, and it's no secret. You can stare right at it, anytime you want.


Read the entire story here.

Big Commodity Trading Firms Took $250 Billion in Profit Since 2003

This sort of outsized profit obtained from gaming the system is a tax on the real economy.

The price distortions they create disrupt legitimate business, and harm the ability of the economy to produce and distribute key resources.

And it is a trade that goes deep and far, with nothing sacred. Witness the havoc that Enron was able to wreak on the energy markets, causing rolling brownouts, while the regulators turn a blind eye.

And as the Chairman of the multinational Nestlé recently observed, access to safe water is 'not a public right.' And the public sources of water should be privatized. And opened up to speculative excess no doubt.

Is it so really hard to understand that widespread corruption and fraud is not productive, and that no amount of austerity or even well-intentioned stimulus given to the corrupt financial system can fix this?

The Banks must be restrained, and the financial system reformed, with balance restored to the economy, before there can be any sustainable recovery.

Intraday SP 500: In Case You Were Wondering Where Key Support Might Be...

The picture is similar for the SP 500 cash market.

Someone who keeps track of these things said that this is the most consistent thirty day rally in US equities since 1929, with the SP never closing once below its 10 day moving average.

Do you think that maybe a Wall Street banking cartel is manipulating stock prices higher now as they did that year? Do you think if it is true it will end badly as it did then?

Intel after the bell, and JP Morgan reports tomorrow morning before the open.

VIX seems to be reaching its nadir, conversely the heights of complacency.

Do you think if the US financial system blows up again the Fed and the Wall Street crowd will claim complete ignorance, point to some nameless act of God, and simply blame the government and the public? And will Timmy and Ben appear before Congress (again) and demand many more billions to save the banking system with ugly threats of dire consequences?

Do you think Benny will apologize for being simply mistaken in his theory like Greenspan did and claim a 'mulligan,' and brazenly go on? As an aside, if Bernanke is knighted by QE II (the sovereign not the subsidy) I think its game over.

If a stock market asset bubble does collapse and wipe out many investors, do you think the talking hairball and the cheerleaders on bubblevision will once again say, "Well nobody MADE people buy stocks."

If you do, you might just be right. Or perhaps for now the band will just play on, Nearer My God to Thee, to keep the upper deck evacuations orderly...

You may be there, but I doubt the usual suspects will be at their posts in the wheelhouse.

What dark visions I have some days.

SP 500 March Futures Intraday at Noon: Credibility Gaps Abounding

Here is an additional interpretation of the big inverse H&S bottom from July 2010 showing a target around 1280 that appears to have been met.

I cannot stress enough how manipulated these markets are, so use caution if you choose to play on their tables.

I was watching some individual stocks on Level II quote feeds and they were marching the prices up and down using 100 share bid/ask transactions. There was a noticeable lack serious buying at most times.

The intraday price manipulation in these markets, and particularly in silver, is becoming so blatantly obvious as to be getting almost silly. It reminds me of our little girl showing me one of her 'card tricks' when she offers me the deck with one card sticking way out and says 'pick one,' and then moves the deck around furiously if I try to pick one of the others.

I think there is a nice setup for a 'flash crash' developing with perhaps some trigger event this time that will be used as a justification for that and perhaps other things.

These fellows on Wall Street and in Washington have gotten through most of their lives by using special privilege, private influence, and simply cheating. By now dishonesty and deception is like a familiar friend that they turn to whenever the going gets tough, so how can we be surprised?

As a reminder, The Quiet Coup - Simon Johnson

“For every credibility gap there is a gullibility fill.” Richard Clopton

End of Year Window Dressing In the SP 500: 2009-2010 and 2008-2009

I am keeping an open mind on this year's window dressing cycle as to the extent and the timing.

Wall Street desperately wishes to hand off this bubble to mom and pop and foreign hands, but so far the target victims are reluctant to buy in. The standard script is to keep running it higher while protecting your own risks with derivatives. If your derivatives counterparty fails then you obtain public funds to bail out of your losses. The objective is always the same: the public loses.

The Fed and Wall Street *could* conceivably keep this going as they did in the early cycle of housing bubble, or the tech bubble. Never underestimate the recklessness of desperate men caught up in a fraud of their own design. When the suckers start to question the game, double down and act even more resolutely and boldly. The average person will believe because they do not think people are capable of such obvious and blatant deception, since they are not so free of scruples and conscience. And of course greed is a marvellously effective prescription for silence, rationalization, and self-deception.

They may feign ignorance in Washington, New York and London, but they know, and it serves their purpose. This is a classic fraud, not even elegant or complex, but merely clumsy, an obvious abuse of trust and power.  It is as noble and productive as running a protection racket on the neighborhood candy store, and robbing little old ladies for their pension checks.

The only thing that is surprising about Wall Street and the US financial frauds is, as Eliot Spitzer famously observed, their scams and schemes are so simple and so obvious when one can pry back the veil of secrecy and see what is actually being done.   Old frauds never go way; they come back endlessly with minor variations and different shades of lipstick.

How obvious and bold can they be? How about this obvious and bold?

 Setting Your Watch by the Silver Manipulation - WT   

It is called 'running the stops' held by the small specs.  It is an old and treasured fraud on the Street, like running up the prices of stocks and then selling them to the public at the top while you quietly exit with your profits and fees.

On the bright side the metals manipulation seems to be faltering, with silver soaring to new highs as the lack of physical metal for delivery impedes the ability for a few banks to endlessly run their paper ponzi scheme of naked shorting and leverage.

All Ponzi schemes end badly, but timing is everything. While there are overleveraged spec shorts to squeeze and pensions to plunder the money printing and tape painting can continue.  You will run out of real wealth, assets and freedom before they will run out of ink.

SP 500 December Futures Intra-Day And General Comments

The market is playing around with these consolidation patterns that start off with a dire overnight trade, that gives way to an intra-day rally and a squeezing of the shorts.

Artificial to be sure, but likely to continue until something happens to stop it. It is unlikely that the government will intervene ahead of an election and in a fragile economy to stop the inflation of an obvious bubble. To the contrary, they are most likely deeply complicit.

This provides emphasis to our caution of waiting for a downturn to develop rather than trying to get in ahead of it. You will just feed the speculative increase.

The more the Fed and Treasury debase the global fiat currency, the higher gold and silver will rise.

"The world will soon wake up to the reality that everyone is broke and can collect nothing from the bankrupt, who are owed unlimited amounts by the insolvent, who are attempting to make late payments on a bank holiday in the wrong country, with an unacceptable currency, against defaulted collateral, of which nobody is sure who holds title."

If the model of the former Soviet Union (empire) holds, at some point the oligarchs will start seizing hard and income producing assets for themselves using their command of fraudulent paper and a corrupt system of governance. This may already be underway when the Congress gave in to the Bankers' threats and passed TARP. I have heard that Wall Street will be taking about 8 percent of M1 as its bonus this year, despite being bailed out at enormous costs, both explicit and hidden, to the American public. Bernanke is transferring over a trillion dollars in interest earnings from savers, institutions, and retirees to Wall Street through this quantitative easing without reform and restructuring.

At some point this may erupt into a crisis with a resolution, but in the meantime it will continue to spread slowly like a wasting disease, concentrating more real wealth and assets in the hands of the politically well-connected few.

Obama is more like a business friendly Herbert Hoover than a reforming Franklin Roosevelt, and this lack of will and a vision forged by determined accomplishment against suffering, moral courage and certitude if you will, is his tragic flaw and America's misfortune.

Silver Charts and a Look at the SP 500 Long Term Cash Chart

Several readers have asked for thoughts on the silver charts.

Silver normally functions as both a monetary and an industrial metal. This provides it with a higher beta (risk variation both on the upside and downside) than gold, and a stronger correlation to the SP 500.

So if one is looking at silver, one first has to ask, what do we think the SP 500 will do next, and then, what will gold do next?

SP 500 Long Term Cash Chart

The SP 500 is at a point where it will either find a footing and break back high according to its longer term bull trend, undoubtedly with serious assistance from the monetary authorities and their banking cohorts, or it will break down further and activate a more serious decline and a H&S topping pattern.

My bias now is for further weakness to the downside, possibly even a false breakdown, and then we will look for the turnaround to gain traction IF volumes remain light and there is no panic selling.

If there is a further decline, let's see if it can hold the 1000 area where there is a long term bottom of the bull trend channel.



Silver Daily Chart

In the short term silver appears to have further downside. How much is a very open question.

If and only if the SP 500 falls out of bed and there is a general liquidation of assets, silver may trigger a short term H&S top and fall down to the target area in green. There it is likely to be a singularly attractive trading buy, but we would have to look at the overall market landscape and the Fed's monetary actions.



Silver Weekly Chart

The weekly chart appears much stronger than the daily chart, suggesting that if there is a breakdown it might be short term, and look much worse on the daily chart, an intra-week spike down on the longer term chart. Again it is hard to say because the SP 500 is such an important variable in this.

I doubt very much that silver and the SP 500 will diverge. Gold however is more likely to diverge from stocks if it comes to that.

I have some confidence in Ben's and Timmy's willingness to sacrifice the dollar and the bond for stocks in the short term, and the US bond appears to be topping. The dollar DX index is looking toppy, but as I have repeatedly said this index is badly out of date, being so heavily weighted to the euro and the yen.

The way I will play this is in the obvious paired trades with little leverage and a short term bias until the situation clarifies. There is a distinct possibility that stocks, gold and silver all go up from here. These market are being driven by artificial liquidity, largely based on thin volumes, carry trades, and technical gambits by the big hedge funds and trading desks.

When you are playing in a rigged casino, don't be all that surprised if your 'systems' and indicators do not produce the usual, or even normalized, results in the short term. The intelligent individual response is to stick with the primary trends, based on fundamentals and the longer term charts, and tighten your leverage and lengthen your investment timeframes.

Or even better, stay out of trading altogether. It is a con game these days, especially in the English speaking countries.

Here is a news piece from the City that is worth reading: Why Rothschilds Is Piling Into Gold

This tracks closely with some information I had from some big private money people in the States, particularly in the old money northeast US.

"My Son...Went Inside There And Basically Saw that the Vault was Empty."

Every day when I think I am going to get a day off from this story, some revelation seems to come out, each as compelling, shocking, and suspicious as the others, but all fitting together in what looks like a nasty picture of reckless behaviour gone wrong developing.

Apparently some banks and brokers had been selling gold and silver which they do not have. We know it happens because Morgan Stanley was caught doing it, and was even charging storage fees from unsuspecting investors.

Do these banks not have auditors? Are the regulators sweeping this under the rug? Are the insiders and their spokespeople correct in just dismissing this as a problem, as was done with the subprime market even by Ben Bernanke himself before it collapsed into a bank run that shocked the financial system?

Now, we have to carefully distinguish between allocated metal, in which one holds a certificate and are assured of a firm ownership of actual metal, and an unallocated holding in which you hold basically a paper claim on metal, for which you may be an unsecured creditor, even if you are paying regular storage fees. But in the cases I am hearing about it is a firmly stated ownership of something that does not exist, and cannot be obtained at current prices.

This is important because although there is always shorting, and some fractional reserve aspect to all banking , even in the case of bullion banking, in this case the proportion or leverage of the selling of the assets starts to look more like a Ponzi scheme than a rational and efficient market. There is a point at which 'speculation' becomes fraud, and the fraud becomes large enough to start risking the health of the bank.

And in our under-regulated and excessively leveraged financial system, that becomes a problem because it all looks to be a pyramid scheme of sorts. JPM alone is holding derivatives with notional values approaching a very large portion of World GDP.

The banks seem to be pointing to bullion supplies elsewhere, such as the LBMA in London, or in this case Hong Kong, and saying, "See if certificate holders demand their bullion, we can easily fulfill their requests." The problem with this is that it appears that they are ALL doing this, overleveraging their supplies, becoming counterparties and potential sources of supply to each other, with few having a full supply of what they say they have.

Make what you will of this. It is important to understand what is stated by the bank or institution on the certificate for bullion that you hold. As outlined above, you might just be an unsecured creditor to an unallocated account. There is no fraud in that, only a risk of actual delivery should you ever ask for it.

I am sure more will be coming out, eventually. But for now this information is barely penetrating the radar of the mainstream media. These fellows may be wrong, but so far no one is denying specifically what they are saying with any persuasive proof. They just seem to be hiding behind secrecy and opaque transactions, saying 'Prove it, prove it.'

As I have stated before, the problem I have with this is the lack of transparency and auditing in these markets, which makes them absolutely ripe for fraud and excessive leverage by the usual suspects in the TBTF banks.

This seems to be exactly what caused the subprime crisis and the bank run in 2008: a lack of liquidity and the mispricing of risk. How can one not be suspicious? We have just seen it happening, even though the herd behaviour is to simply ignore it because it is too alarming, too inconvenient.

Let the truth come out. Let justice be done.

Have we learned nothing?

For Warren Mosler: A Primer on the Difference Between Honesty and Fraud

Warren Mosler is "an economist specializing in monetary policy and running for Senator Dodd's Senate seat in the November elections." He has written the following piece for the Huffington Post. He is so incredibly off the mark that I thought a bit of correction to that spin might help his thinking before he hits the campaign trail.

Mr. Mosler. I have been following this case closely. No one at GATA, or anyone else looking at the state of the regulatory climate in Washington and the quality and tarnished reputation of US markets, is complaining about the normal sort of trading that has been going on 'for thousands of years.' Most of the people with whom I have spoken and questioned are seasoned traders with a profound understanding of the commodity markets, and equity markets, and derivatives.

What many people are complaining about is fraud. In this case fraud can loosely be defined as doing something and then lying about it. Saying you did not do something, or disguising the nature of what you have been doing, can turn even a prima facie benign action into a fraud, depending on the intention and degree.

Many people around the world are not complaining that the US has lent out its gold, and the 'depositories are filled with paper,' which may some day be replaced by gold again. Although they do point out that it will be replaced at MUCH higher prices if their suspicions are correct. They are pointing out that government officials have said repeatedly that they have never lent it out in the first place but refuse to submit to audits and transparent accounting. And if it did occur, such lending may be of questionable legal status, which is why so many have denied it has occurred. Only the Congress can allow for the attachment of binding claims to sovereign assets. Have they? And if, in exercising some new presidential prerogative, the executive has done so, where is the public disclosure? Where is the law?

And further, in the case of commercial entities like the TBTF bullion banks JPM and HSBC, they are not complaining about short selling that is backed by physical metal, duly paid and accounted for. They are asking questions about what appear to be enormous naked short positions against silver, questionable ownership and claims to collateral, and naked shorting by banks using public funds and powerful influence over the regulators, with selling patterns indicating the intention of manipulating the price in order to gain from it. Sound familiar? It seems as though this has been the very basis of the US financial system since the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

Although your essay contains a number of factual errors, this does stand out as a particularly misleading statement:

"If you hold gold, lending it is a way to make extra money with very little risk."

Tell that to the miners like Barrick that took a multi-billion dollar bath on their hedge book. Derivatives and transactions involving naked shorting and selling the same thing multiple times are never, ever relatively riskless or easy. There is always the real risk of the mispricing of risk and miscalculation of probability, and counterparty failure, which at times can reach the point of becoming systemically risky, as we most recently have seen in the case of AIG et al. This is the story of all bubbles and bank runs. Reckless leverage and mispricing of risk.

Janet Tavakoli sounded the alarm that a short squeeze in gold could bring JPM and the banks to their knees, and risk the global markets again. JPM is dealing in trillions of derivatives exposure, with a leverage that is breath-taking. To dismiss the complaints and concerns about this is as reckless as some of the more outlandish assurances made by Greenspan,and then Bernanke, just prior to the credit crunch about the housing bubble.

In the end the Fed had Paulson come running to Congress pleading for $780 billion in taxpayer money with no strings attached, or face a complete and utter meltdown, riots and martial law. Oh well, and tra la, today is a new day, and back to gorging on risk again, eh? Not to worry.

At the end of the day its about honesty. And playing by the rules, the same rules for everyone. Its about justice, for all, and not just the powerful few. Not privatizing outlandish profits, and then socializing the mispricing of risk that is at the heart of the imbalances creating those outsized profits for a few in the first place. That is the very basis of fraud, and it requires secrecy and regulatory annulment to flourish.

"The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings." John F. Kennedy

So thank you for the primer on gold lending. I see you have also read the primer about answering the question you wish you had been asked, rather than the one which you have been asked, in order to divert the conversation away from something you do not wish to discuss at all.

Huffington Post
A Primer on Gold Lending

"Recently there have been a lot of what I believe to be gross misconceptions regarding the lending of gold and the absence of actual gold in various gold depositories. I'm writing this to clarify the lending process itself and the further ramifications of gold lending...

GATA (Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee) is complaining that the US govt. has lent gold and is therefore artificially keeping the price of gold lower than it would otherwise be. There is some truth to the idea that lending keeps spot gold prices lower than otherwise, as it keeps the spreads between spot an forward prices 'in line' but you can just as easily say that lenders selling spot and buying forward keep the forward prices higher than otherwise, giving gold producers a better price than otherwise.

So all that gold 'missing' from depositories is in the form of cash in the depositories and contracts to buy gold in the forward markets. And with gold being produced in large quantities for untold years into the future it's hard to say for sure that there isn't enough gold coming to market over that time to satisfy the demand. In fact, market theory would say the continuously changing clearing price means there is always exactly the right amount."

P.S. OMG, I cannot believe you resorted to the 'efficient market hypothesis' to attempt to prove that market fraud cannot exist, given all that has happened over the past ten years. That is truly embarrassing. Even Chris Dodd knows better than that. That prompted me to take a look at your CV. Word of advice. Peter Schiff is going to hammer you in the unlikely event you agree to debate him, unless you tighten up your thinking a bit.

"So all that gold 'missing' from depositories is in the form of cash in the
depositories and contracts to buy gold in the forward markets. And with gold
being produced in large quantities for untold years into the future it's hard to
say for sure that there isn't enough gold coming to market over that time to
satisfy the demand. In fact, market theory would say the continuously
changing clearing price means there is always exactly the right amount."

Like Daniel Drew said, "He who sells what isn't his'n, Must buy it back or go to prison." And it seems that lately the price the financiers have had to pay to buy it back, and make good on their promises, is punishingly higher than they have reserved, arranged or accounted for, especially when calculating their salaries and bonuses. This is the undercurrent of the frauds that have been perpetrated in this brave New World of innovative financing and dodgy derivatives and bonuses paid on the if-come. And the public is being forced to make up the difference and pay the price, for the good of the system, don'tcha know. And they are not even allowed to ask 'why?'

Whistleblower Speaks Out On J. P. Morgan's Market Manipulation - Reports Violations to the CFTC in the Silver Market

Do we have another Harry Markopolos here, describing in detail the manipulation of the silver markets by J.P. Morgan to the CFTC? How does this square with the testimony today from the CFTC Commissioners, who seem to indicate that the markets are functioning extremely well, and that investor can have full confidence in them?

I am led to understand that Mr. McGuire had offered to testify before the CFTC today, and that he was refused admittance. I do not know him, or the position he is in within the trading community. I cannot therefore assess his credibility or the validity of any evidence which he may present or possess. But I have the feeling that nothing will come of this.

Remember, there was no action on the Madoff scandal until AFTER his fraud collapsed, and the government was forced to acknowledge Markopolos' existence. He had been ignored and dismissed by the bureaucrats at the SEC for years because of Madoff's power and standing with the trading establishment. And of course by those who had an interest in hiding Madoff's scheme, if nothing else, to promote 'confidence' in the markets.

What seems particularly twisted about this is that JPM is the custodian of the largest silver ETF (SLV). Is anyone auditing that ETF, and watching any conflicts of interest and self-trading? Multiple counterparty claims on the same bullion?

If you ever wanted to see a good reason for the Volcker rule, this is it. These jokers are one of the US' largest banks, with trillions of dollars in unaudited derivatives exposure, and they seem to be engaging in trading practices like Enron did before it collapsed.

Have they lost their minds, or are they just that reckless, immature, short term, and arrogant? Morgan practically holds the keys to the US Treasury, a recent recipient of billions in taxpayer support, and still receiving signficant subsidies from the Fed. They seem to be in dire need of adult supervision. Blatantly and clumsily rigging the silver market, and then bragging about it to people outside their company. What's next, bumping off grannies for their Social Security checks? Three card monte games on the boardwalk?

I was trying to understand why this item struck me so hard this evening. It shocked me in a way that few things do anymore. I think it is because I had unconsciously come to the same conclusion earlier, on my own, in the post where I showed the repeated and obvious bear raids on gold into this option expiration, and it struck a resonant chord when I read McGuire's description of the silver manipulation. I refused to believe it, but apparently there it is. The "Dr. Evil" trading strategy that Citigroup was caught using in the Eurobond markets.

I do not expect the detailed facts on this to ever reach the light of day in my lifetime. The implications are far too political.

ADDITIONAL STATEMENT BY BILL MURPHY, CHAIRMAN OF THE GOLD ANTI-TRUST ACTION COMMITTEE

HEARINGS ON THE METALS MARKETS, MARCH 25, 2010

On March 23, 2010 GATA Director Adrian Douglas was contacted by a whistleblower by the name of Andrew Maguire. Mr. Maguire, formerly of Goldman Sachs, is a metals trader in London. He has been told first hand by traders working for JPMorganChase that JPMorganChase manipulates the precious metals markets and they bragged how they make money doing so.

In November 2009 he contacted the CFTC enforcement division to report this criminal activity. He described in detail the way in which JPM signals to the market its intention to take down the precious metals<. Traders recognize these signals and make money shorting the metals along side JPM. He explained how there are routine market manipulations at the time of option expiry, Non-farm payroll data releases, and Comex contract rollover as well as other ad hoc events.

On February 3 he gave two days advance warning by email to Mr Eliud Ramirez, a senior investigator of the Enforcement Division, that the precious metals would be attacked upon the release of the non-farm payroll data on February 5. Then on February 5 as it played out exactly as predicted further emails were sent to Mr. Ramirez in real time while the manipulation was in progress.

It would not be possible to predict such a market move in advance unless the market was manipulated.

In an email on that day Mr. Maguire said "It is 'common knowledge' here in London amongst the metals traders it is JPM's intent to flush out and cover as many shorts as possible prior to any discussion in March about position limits. I feel sorry for all those not in this loop. A serious amount of money was made and lost today and in my opinion as a result of the CFTC allowing by your own definition an illegal concentrated and manipulative position to continue"

Expiry of the COMEX APRIL call options is today. There was large open interest in strikes from $1100 to $1150 in gold. As always happens month after month HSBC and JPM sell short in large quantities to overwhelm all bids and make unsuspecting option holders lose their money. As predicted in advance by GATA the manipulation started on March 19th when gold was trading at $1126. By last night it traded at $1085.

This is how much the gold cartel fears the enforcement division. They thumb their noses at you because in over a decade of complaints and 18 months of a silver market manipulation investigation nothing has been done to stop them. And this is why JPM’s cocky and arrogant traders in London are able to brag that they manipulate the market.

It is an outrage and we are making available the emails from our whistleblower, Andrew Maguire available to the Press wherein he warns in advance of a manipulative event.

Additionally Mr. Maguire informed us that he has taped recordings of his telephone communications with the CFTC for which we are taking the appropriate legal steps to acquire.

-END-

From: Andrew Maguire
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 12:51 PM
To: Ramirez, Eliud [CFTC]
Cc: Chilton, Bart [CFTC]
Subject: Silver today

Dear Mr. Ramirez:

I thought you might be interested in looking into the silver trading today. It was a good example of how a single seller, when they hold such a concentrated position in the very small silver market, can instigate a selloff at will.

(Note: This is the "Dr. Evil" trading strategy that got Citi rebuked and fined in the Euro Bond markets, and also got Enron into trouble in the energy markets. - Jesse)

These events trade to a regular pattern and we see orchestrated selling occur 100% of the time at options expiry, contract rollover, non-farm payrolls (no matter if the news is bullish or bearish), and in a lesser way at the daily silver fix. I have attached a small presentation to illustrate some of these events. I have included gold, as the same traders to a lesser extent hold a controlling position there too....

I brought to your attention during our meeting how we traders look for the "signals" they (JPMorgan) send just prior to a big move. I saw the first signals early in Asia in thin volume. As traders we profited from this information but that is not the point as I do not like to operate in a rigged market and what is in reality a crime in progress.

As an example, if you look at the trades just before the pit open today you will see around 1,500 contracts sell all at once where the bids were tiny by comparison in the fives and tens. This has the immediate effect of gaining $2,500 per contract on the short positions against the long holders, who lost that in moments and likely were stopped out. Perhaps look for yourselves into who was behind the trades at that time and note that within that 10-minute period 2,800 contracts hit all the bids to overcome them. This is hardly how a normal trader gets the best price when selling a commodity. Note silver instigated a rapid move lower in both precious metals.

This kind of trading can occur only when a market is being controlled by a single trading entity.

I have a lot of captured data illustrating just about every price takedown since JPMorgan took over the Bear Stearns short silver position.

I am sure you are in a better position to look into the exact details.

It is my wish just to bring more information to your attention to assist you in putting a stop to this criminal activity.

Kind regards,
Andrew Maguire

Read more on this, and some particular examples of silver market manipulation, here.

Market Concentration - Approximately 80% of the Precious Metal Derivatives
This is remniscent of the Oil and Steel Trusts from the turn of the 20th Century

NY Precious Metals Prices Pressured into Futures Options Expiration

As gold and silver trading in the states moves into another futures option expiration and the rollover from the April contract with first delivery notice time approaching, the paper gold market deviates once again from the world market for bullion.

As John Brimelow notes:

Intriguingly, so also may be China. Mitsui-HK today explicitly says:
“While euro tried to pull the yellow metal lower, Chinese buying wanted to push it higher”

More concretely, the Shanghai market closed at a $6.08 premium to world gold of $1,091.98, the second day of unusually high premiums. At the equivalent of 8,469 NY lots, volume actually exceeded TOCOM for the first time I can remember. Andy Smith of Bache suggested the other day that China might resort to buying gold to groom its foreign trade statistics, which he pointed out was done by Japan in the 80s and Taiwan in the 90s. Official action would not show in Shanghai, of course, but maybe the hive mind is at work.

Local Vietnam gold stood at a $27.89 premium to world gold of $1,087.20 early today (Wednesday $24.41/$1,104.20).

While on day session volume equivalent to 7,804 NY contracts TOCOM open interest slipped 2.9 tonnes (900 NY), the public added 3.67 tonnes (6.8%) to their long. The active contract added 15 yen and world gold rose $1.25 during the session to go out $3 above NY’s depressed Wednesday 4PM level.

Gold in Euros rallied fairly smoothly from the end of yesterdays’ NY aftermarket until the European open, then moved approximately sideways until 10AM NY. $US gold did the same, but more erratically. At its intraday high around 7-30 AM it was up $6.80. A raid seems now to be underway. Estimated volume at 9AM is reported to be an eye-popping 206,132 lots which if not an error will need some explaining; the CME website indicates volume at 10 AM was roughly 87,000 of which about half was done before the floor session.

With the option expiry still pending price resistance in NY is to be expected, which will greatly please the now clearly activated Eastern physical buyers.

Do you think they were banging the price lower with heavy short selling in the early hours to depress the price below the key strike prices around 1090 and more importantly, 1100? When there are no limits on positions and you have deep pockets in a fairly thin market, the opportunities for manipulating price action becomes a rather compelling temptation, especially if you think the Fed 'has your back' and expect to be bailed out by them or the Exchanges if you are ever cornered for delivery of what you have already sold.

While traders can make money just following the momentum of the big trading desks on this obvious price pattern, it does not foster confidence to see the markets so obviously pushed around, and for the regulators to be so obviously asleep at their desks (or surfing porn, as the recent investigations of the SEC have disclosed).

This is not to say that there are no government officials and regulators trying to do the right thing for the public which they serve and the oaths which they have taken. Elizabeth Warren, Chair of the TARP Oversight Program, and Bart Chilton, a CFTC Commissioner, and a Bush nominee no less, who are providing outstanding leadership on the subject of market reforms. It is would be good to see them receive more visible support from this Administration, to encourage the many in government who would be more than wiling to act, given the appropriate encouragement and leadership.

Gold April Futures Hourly Chart



Gold June Futures Hourly Chart



Gold Weekly Chart



Silver Weekly Chart



Mining Index

Risk? What Risk? We Don't See No Stinkin' Risk..

"It is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion." Paul Joseph Goebbels

As measured by the VIX, the volatility index, the perception of risk in US markets has declined significantly in the last twelve months from over 50 to current readings around 20.



As a response to this changed perception, mutual funds are once again fully invested, with levels of cash reserves at record lows. In other words, the 'other people's money' crowd are all in.



There is an interesting distribution top forming in the US equity markets. This rally has been driven by liquidity delivered from the Fed and the Treasury primarily to the Wall Street banks, who are deriving an extraordinary amount of their income from trading for their own books, at least based on published results.

Much of the rally in US stocks has occurred on thin volumes and in the overnight trading sessions. Definitely not a vote of confidence, and a sign of potential price manipulation in fact.

Is this a 'set up' to separate the public from even more of their own money, using their own money? Perhaps.

The government is frantic to restore confidence in the US markets, and the toxic asset rich banks are more than capable of using that sincere interest to unload their mispriced paper on the greater fools again.

The perception of risk is a powerful tool in shaping the response of markets, and as an instrument of foreign and domestic government policy actions. It is nothing new, as indicated by the quote from Joseph Goebbels, but it is rising to new levels of sophistication and acceptance in nations with at least a nominal commitment to freedom of choice and transparency of governance.

"There is a social theory called reflexivity which refers to the circular relationship between cause and effect. A reflexive relationship is bidirectional where both the cause and the effect affect one another in a situation that renders both functions causes and effects.

The principle of reflexivity was first introduced by the sociologist William Thomas as the Thomas theorem, but more importantly it was later popularized and applied to the financial markets by George Soros. Soros restated the social theory of reflexivity eloquently and simply, as follows:

markets influence events they anticipate – George Soros

This theorem has become a basic tenant of modern central banking. The idea is that manipulation of the psychology of market participants affects the markets themselves. Therefore, if you artificially suppress the price of gold, you reduce inflationary expectations and reduce inflation itself…so the theory goes."

Why Do the World's Central Banks Manipulate the Price of Gold?

For now we must watch the key levels of resistance around 1115 in the SP. A trading range is most probable but there is a potential distribution top forming with a down side objective around 870 on the SP 500.

It does bear watching, closely, keeping in mind that this is an option expiration week, and the traders expect the market to misrepresent its price discovery, as the result of conscious manipulation.

US Equity Market Options Expiration: Shenanigans Central

For those of you not keeping track, tomorrow is option expiration for the US stock exchanges. This normally precipitates an unusual amount of gaming and painting on the tape, as the writers and holders of puts and calls shove the prices around to inflict the most pain on anyone foolish enough to play their game.

Intel reports after the bell tonight and the market is expecting great things from them.

Tomorrow the US reports CPI, and then heads into a three day weekend, as Monday is Martin Luther King day in the US. Martin Luther King had a dream; and this may not be it.

The SP 500 futures have been the lead sled dog in this rally with the banks carrying the water. The daily chart has a rising wedge on it that is quite ominous, but we recall the rising trend in the 2003-7 stock reflation that never broke, and kept rising on light volumes to the bubble peak. And then of course it collapsed, with the other bubbles, of which it was a symptom, compliments of the Federal Reserve and the Bush Treasury.



Here is the last reflationary bubble that the Treasury and the Fed created. Remember that one?

Who Is the 'One Big Bidder' For US Treasuries?

There are a number of possibilities for the identity of the non-primary dealer domestic source of enormous purchases at the longer end of the yield curve in recent US Treasury auctions.

It could be a misclassification, a branch of a bank representing a foreign power. The problem with this theory is that foreign Central Banks have a reluctance to buy the long end of the curve.

It also could be a legitimate domestic purchaser like a pension fund compelled to match duration of obligations, as is required by a little noted ruling of the US government a couple of years ago. They might be shifting out of other long term instruments with similar durations but more risk.

It might even be PIMCO. They certain have the money as the world's biggest bond fund, and they do offer two Treasury ETF's which, although not directly related to the products bought, might be relevant on a cross trade. And PIMCO has recently been talking down Treasuries in favor of corporates, which doesn't mean anything since traders often 'talk their book.' Still, unless it is for the ETFs it is hard to justify buying the long durations straight up in size. And while PIMCO says they do not like Treasuries, Benny and the Fed said they are buying long to keep interest rates lower. Why doubt them?

And of course, it might very well be the Federal Reserve Bank, or the Treasury via the Exchange Stabilization Fund.

It could also be the big bidder who comes in with some regularity and smashes down the price of the precious metals, with the obvious intent of manipulating the market, like clockwork just after the PM fix in London with some frequency.

It might even be the mysterious bidder who stands ready to buy the SP futures at every weakness, maintaining a floor on the market, and a steady drift higher in prices, with no change in fundamental underpinnings. Their hand in the market is apparent.

It is less probable, given the state of market manipulation by a few big proprietary trading desks riding another wave of cheap FEd money, but it might even be the party that entered the US equity market yesterday at 12:03 PM with a HUGE order (228,000 contracts) to buy the SP futures. As Larry Levin noted, "As of now I don't have a firm answer, but whether it was HFT activity, the "Helicopter," or a massive cross trade, it sure set the bottom in for the afternoon. Everyone in the Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P pits were talking about it and nobody was willing to sell into that massive bid." And so the market rallied once again into its current peak. No doubt it will be blamed on Monsieur Fat Fingers. Funny how lucky the big prop traders are with their reckless accidents, with millions gained from gaming the market, and all by accident.

As the article from the Financial Times indicates, it might never be possible to find out who this is, unless there is an audit of the market that is made public. As Edmund Burke noted, "Fraud is the Minister of Injustice" and it is my experience that opacity is the accomplice of fraud. Who has the most to hide these days?

Personally I think the Fed is buying across the yield curve to affect interest rates, and Treasury takes care of stocks and commodities through the Exchange Stabilization Fund, and friends in a few key banks, but who can say for sure, without the power of wiretap, audit, and subpoena?

If this is price manipulation, no matter the intentions or beneficiaries, it is likely that it is mispricing risk in a big way, misallocating investments, and will eventually will fail. Its failure will cause a great deal of pain in the real economy for innocent bystanders, and will end in tears. And when that time comes, expect those who created the crisis to make the public another offer that they think you cannot refuse, in excess of their last demand for 700$ billions, tout de suite.

You decide what is most likely, and what needs to be done about it, if anything.

More than a few people are wondering at the lack of response from the people in various nations, particularly in the UK and the US. Here is some old knowledge that might prove illuminating.

National Madness
Gilbert Keith Chesterton 1910

"This slow and awful self-hypnotism of error is a process that can occur not only with individuals, but also with whole societies. It is hard to pick out and prove; that is why it is hard to cure. But this mental degeneration may be brought to one test, which I truly believe to be a real test.

A nation is not going mad when it does extravagant things, so long as it does them in an extravagant spirit. But whenever we see things done wildly, but taken tamely, then the State is growing insane...

For madness is a passive as well as an active state: it is a paralysis, a refusal of the nerves to respond to the normal stimuli, as well as an unnatural stimulation. There are commonwealths, plainly to be distinguished here and there in history, which pass from prosperity to squalor or from glory to insignificance, or from freedom to slavery, not only in silence, but with serenity."

And in this slow descent into madness, the worst is surely yet to come.

Financial Times
Direct bids for US Treasury notes lead to speculation over buyer
By Michael Mackenzie in New York
January 14 2010 02:00

Auctions of US Treasury notes this week have attracted extremely strong buying from domestic institutional investors, fuelling speculation that "one big bidder" has decided to defy the conventional wisdom on Wall Street that US government debt is due for a fall.

Yesterday, direct bids accounted for 17 per cent of the sales of $21bn in 10-year Treasury notes, far higher than the recent average of 7.4 per cent. It was the highest percentage of direct bids in a 10-year Treasury auction since May 2005.

On Tuesday, direct bids accounted for a record 23.4 per cent of the bidding for $40bn in three-year notes, up from an average direct bid of 6 per cent.

Market participants say the unusually high level of direct bidding suggests that a large investor is looking to accumulate Treasuries without alerting the primary dealers on Wall Street to its intentions.

"It appears to us that someone is trying to hide their apparent interest in owning these auctions from the rest of the market," said David Ader, strategist at CRT Capital.

Rick Klingman, managing director at BNP Paribas, said: "It is unusual to see such a spike in the direct bid and I would imagine it is one big bidder. There is no way we will find out who it is, not now, or ever."

The surge in direct bidding is particularly notable because it comes after predictions that the record levels of Treasury debt issuance would exhaust investor demand, driving yields higher.

Among the most high-profile warnings came from Pimco, manager of the largest bond fund, which raised concerns about the escalating supply of US Treasury debt.

Attention will now focus on whether there is similar direct demand for today's $13bn 30-year bond sale.

The 10-year notes were sold at a yield of 3.754 per cent yesterday, the highest rate awarded for a note sale since June, when they were issued at 3.99 per cent. At the start of the year the yield on 10-year notes briefly traded at 3.90 per cent, as many investors talked down the prospects for Treasuries. The note traded at about 3.70 per cent earlier this week and was at 3.70 per cent late yesterday.

Under the three main classifications of buyers in Treasury debt sales, direct bidders are generally domestic non-primary dealer banks and large institutional investors. Normally their presence at Treasury auctions is small, as they usually buy debt through the primary dealer network, which currently numbers 18 banks and broker/dealers.

The US Bull Market in Smoke, Mirrors and Gullible Investors

We have given quite a bit of coverage to the somewhat 'thin' veneer of recovery being spun by misleading government econmic statistics in the US.

And we have certainly noted the almost blatant manipulation in many US markets, including stocks and commodities where the banks and hedge funds have been pushing prices around, sometimes with the help of the government, in a disgraceful repudiation of any notion of reform.

Thanks to the Tylers at ZeroHedge we have two very nice charts to present the case that the recent continuation of the US stock market rally is attributable to price manipulation largely in the after hours markets when trading is thin.

After Hours Verus Prime Hours Cumulative Trading Gains from September 2009



After Hours Versus Prime Hours Cumulative Trading Gains from March 2009



And a Ballooning Price-to-Earnings Ratio as a Result



Its pretty much a Ponzi scheme, and not all that well hidden. This is probably why insiders continue to sell in large numbers.

If the US market breaks it will go badly for many average people who do not understand how their government has failed to protect them.

But do not underestimate the power of the Bernanke Fed and its enablers in the central banks to continue printing enormous amounts of unfunded dollars and hiding the effects. This may buoy the US markets for longer than we might think, as it did in 2003 to 2007.

But at some point the payments will come due, value will be revealed, price discovery will assert itself, the US dollar and the bond will fail, and then comes the deluge.

Watch what India and China do with their reserves. They know full well what is coming and unlike the US are seeking to protect their people.