No Recovery: Longest Sustained Fall In UK Real Wages In Recorded History

Why is there no sustainable recovery?

Because of the policy errors of the West to save the corrupt financial system, but abandon the people whom 'the system' is intended to serve.

You may read the story about why the Bank of England is likely to keep interest rates low, which accompanies this graph, in the Financial Times.

We Are Still In a Financial Crime Wave

In his recent column The Opposite of Stagflation Paul Krugman says that:

"One of the truly amazing (and disheartening) things about the Great Recession and its aftermath has been the continuing insistence of many economists that it’s somehow a supply-side slump, driven by the evils of Obamacare or something. This tends to come from people who view stagflation in the 1970s as having permanently refuted all things Keynes.

So I guess it’s worth pointing out repeatedly that the recent slump shows all the hallmarks of a demand-side shock; in particular, rising unemployment has been associated with falling inflation — the opposite of stagflation."

So I guess its also worth pointing out that the opposite of stagflation is not economic stagnation with declining inflation, but steady growth with very modest inflation. But given it is Paul K. we'll grant that he is assuming inflation as a reference point in this.   And in focusing in on the model battles, he is saying that we are indeed seeing stagnation, but there is deflation as his form of the Keynes model would predict.  Huzzah!

 

I will put aside for now his assertion that we are seeing declining inflation.  I think it might be said we are seeing little inflation growth overall, but with inflation appearing in certain product segments and assets.  But this is, I believe, an artifact of the way in which the Fed is pursuing very significant, top down monetary stimulus in a system that is still distorted and corrupted by the financial sector and its moneyed interests.  A few at the top are taking the greatest part of the monetary growth, and their demand is not for common goods but for luxuries, and monopolies, and more financial assets.

And so Paul Krugman is triumphant, because he would then go on to say, as he often does, that all we have to do is pour massive stimulation in to the economy from the fiscal side, and the demand side of the economy would recover as consumers could use their wages to purchase more goods.  Problem solved. 

 

And its a good piece of intellectual land to stake out, because no matter what the actual outcome in the real world, Paul will be able to argue that he was right if there is a favorable outcome.  Or if not, then it would have been favorable except that the government did not provide enough stimulus.  I would be inclined to believe that even if stagflation does eventually show up, he will argue that it was some other anomaly that does not affect his model.  A model that is too narrowly focused, and yet with too many degrees of freedom, to be useful.  

 

This works for Paul because his focus is sufficiently narrow and circumscribed, which is the failure of most economic models to provide any actual benefit for the real world, and are unsuited for the purposes of making policy decisions except at the most advisory level.  It allows him to almost completely ignore the facts on the ground, what really happened to cause the financial crisis, and what forces exist to keep it stubbornly at work despite massive top down monetary stimulus by the Fed.  

 

But like the housing bubble, when reality throws an economist a curveball, I have no doubt he will search his many hundreds of columns and find that he mentioned it, once.  And I suppose he may have mentioned reform once or twice as well.

 

His heart may be closer to the solution than the Austerians, but his mind is still carrying water for a system of learning, a method of distributing the benefits of productivity, and a political mindset that is more of an impediment to progress that an aid to it.. This is what happens when a vibrant set of theories from an original mind like John Maynard Keynes suffer from the arteriosclerosis of political dogmatism.  And after all, economics is a disgraced profession.

 

It is the hallmark of what Chris Hedges has called 'the death of the liberal class,' and along with it, the death of its conscience and sacrifice of moral principles to expediency in the service of power.  Few better representatives of this than the Clintons and Obama, and their acolytes in the status quo.  But they are presented as the alternative to an opposing political point of view so base as to almost redefine hypocrisy and greed.

 

The Banks must be restrained, and the financial system reformed, with balance restored to the economy, before there can be any sustainable recovery.

h/t Yves Smith, et al.

The Recovery™ In One Chart

"Plunderers of the world, when nothing remains on the lands to which they have laid waste by wanton thievery, they search out across the seas.  The wealth of another region excites their greed; and if it is weak, their lust for power as well.  Nothing from the rising to the setting of the sun is enough for them. Among all others only they are compelled to attack the poor as well as the rich.

Robbery, rape, and slaughter they falsely call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace."

Tacitus, Agricola

Funny thing, human nature. Despite all the trappings of progress nothing ever seems to change except the names.

Empire is now called 'war on terror.'

Panem et circenses. Washington is certainly a circus, and we know who is getting all the bread.

Consumer Metrics Institute: Growth Index Update Vs. US GDP

The relationship between CMI's Growth Index as an indicator of US GDP is interesting. If it continues its correlation the US GDP is in for a serious slump, if not a double dip. The Fed is likely to initiate a new round of quantitative easing in response, although they will try to jawbone their way around the monetization issues.

Growth Index Past 4 Years



The Consumer Metrics Institute's 91-day 'Trailing Quarter' Growth Index -vs- U.S. Department of Commerce's Quarterly GDP Growth Rates over past 4 years. The quarterly GDP growth rates are shown as 3-month plateaus in the graph. The Consumer Metrics Institute's Growth Index is plotted as a monthly average.

Consumer Metrics Institute's Contraction Watch



The comparison of the 91-Day Growth Indexes during the 'quarter' immediately following the commencement of a contraction. The quarterly GDP growth rates are shown as 3-month plateaus in the graph. The Consumer Metrics Institute's Growth Index is plotted as a monthly average. The contraction events of 2006, 2008 and 2010 are shown against the same scale of annualized contraction.

Charts by the Consumer Metrics Institute

Is the US Financial Crisis Over?

This frankness and honest statement of the situation is the reason that Paul Volcker, one of the most credible advisors in the Obama Administration, is a marginalized voice as compared to Larry Summers and Turbo Tim. Ironic, because only by assuming Volcker's leadership style can the US President hope to get his country out of this cycle of monetary bubbles, systemic fragility, and chronic imbalances driven by an outsized, counterproductive financial sector.

DER SPIEGEL: But even though there are still more people being fired than hired, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke is saying that the recession is technically over. Do you agree with him?

Paul Volcker: You know, people get very technical about these things. We had a quarter of increased growth but I don't think we are out of the woods.

SPIEGEL: You expect a backlash?

Volcker: The recovery is quite slow and I expect it to continue to be pretty slow and restrained for a variety of reasons and the possibility of a relapse can't be entirely discounted. I'm not predicting it but I think we have to be careful.

SPIEGEL: What is the difference between this deep recession and all the other recessions we have seen since World War II?

Volcker: What complicates this situation, as compared to the ordinary garden variety recession, is that we have this financial collapse on top of an economic disequilibrium. Too much consumption and too little investment, too many imports and too few exports. We have not been on a sustainable economic track and that has to be changed. But those changes don't come overnight, they don't come in a quarter, they don't come in a year. You can begin them but that is a process that takes time. If we don't make that adjustment and if we again pump up consumption, we will just walk into another crisis.

SPIEGEL: The US has not yet instituted any kind of reform policy. What we see is the government and the Federal Reserve pouring money into the economy. If one looks beyond that money, one sees that the economy is in fact still shrinking.

Volcker: What should I say? That's right. We have not yet achieved self-reinforcing recovery. We are heavily dependent upon government support so far. We are on a government support system, both in the financial markets and in the economy...

The rest of the interview can be read here

The net Treasury International Capital flows came in light today at 20.7B versus 38.7B expected. GE was a drag on the big caps because of Immelt's lack of enthusiasm for any US recovery.

As a reminder, tomorrow the FOMC will make its December rate decision public at 2:15 EST. Traditationally there will be shenanigans abounding. In the morning the US will be revealing its premiere fantasy economy number, the Consumer Price Index.

As a heads up, Gold often gets hit with a bear raid on FOMC day. Since the miners were hit a bit today with possible front-running that might be a good bet. Who can say in these thin markets?

The US economy is much like this stock market rally: big on show and thin on substance.

Stiglitz on the Financial Crisis

Joe Stiglitz describes the current financial crisis and prospective recovery quite well, and the conclusions he draws are remarkably similar to our own which is gratifying.

It's good to hear these things from a distinguished Nobel laureate, and not just from your humble Propriétaire, while puttering over his daily bread.

Bloomberg
Stiglitz Says U.S. Economic Recovery May Not Be ‘Sustainable’
By Michael McKee

Sept. 4 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. economy faces a “significant chance” of contracting again after emerging from its worst recession since the 1930s, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said.

“It’s not clear that the U.S. is recovering in a sustainable way,” Stiglitz, a Columbia University professor, told reporters yesterday in New York.

Economists and policy makers are expressing concern about the strength of a projected economic recovery, with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner saying two days ago that it’s too soon to remove government measures aimed at boosting growth.

Stiglitz said he sees two scenarios for the world’s largest economy in coming months. One is a period of “malaise,” in which consumption lags and private investment is slow to accelerate. The other is a rebound fueled by government stimulus that’s followed by an abrupt downturn -- an occurrence that economists call a “W-shaped’ recovery.

“There’s a significant chance of a W, but I don’t think it’s inevitable,” he said. The economy “could just bounce along the bottom.”

Stiglitz said it’s difficult to predict the economy’s trajectory because “we really are in a different world.” He said the crisis of the past year was made worse by lax regulation that allowed some financial firms to grow so large that the system couldn’t handle a failure of any of them.

Big Banks

“These institutions are not only too big to fail, they are too big to be managed,” he said.

Finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of 20 nations meet in London Sept. 4-5 to lay the groundwork for a summit in Pittsburgh later this month, where leaders will consider measures to overhaul supervision of the financial system...

With so much excess capacity, the American economy faces a short-term threat of disinflation and possibly deflation, Stiglitz said. Wages may even decline, given recent high productivity and the likelihood of an extended period of high unemployment, he said.

Longer term, he said the Fed’s aggressive monetary policy will mean inflation becomes the greater threat. “With the magnitude of the deficits and the balance sheet of the Fed having been blown up, it’s understandable why there are anxieties about inflation,” he said.

While the Fed says it has the tools to deal with it, there are still concerns, Stiglitz said. Because monetary policy takes six to 18 months to have its full effect, the central bank will have to begin withdrawing monetary stimulus on the basis of forecasts.

The Fed’s record on its economic forecasts isn’t enough to reassure investors and, as a result, the U.S. currency may suffer, he said.

Dollar ‘Weakness’

“Whether or not they’re able to do it, the uncertainty today about whether they can do it can contribute to the weakness of the dollar,” Stiglitz said. “That’s one of the reasons there is increasing interest around the world in discussing alternatives to the dollar system.”

Stiglitz, who is a member of a United Nations commission that will study the global financial system and currency regimes, said “the logic is compelling” for a new global currency.

The current system creates instability, weakens global confidence, and is fundamentally unfair to developing countries that are in essence lending the U.S. trillions of dollars and bearing the risk, he said.

“In most quarters, there is a feeling we should move away from the dollar system. The question is do we do it in an orderly way, or a chaotic way,” Stiglitz said. “The size of the deficit and the size of the balance sheet of the Fed have just increased the anxiety and the desire that something be done.”

While some think it would hurt the U.S. to no longer be able to borrow cheaply in dollars, “that era is over,” he said. “We’re moving to a more multi-polar world.”

Between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of Lehman Brothers was “the short period of American triumphalism, where we dominated the global scene. That period is over,” Stiglitz said.