Gold Chart Weekly Updated - Taking Some Profits

Gold bullion is nearing our intermediate price objective for the breakout which we have been following since US$1,020 per ounce. Here is the updated chart. Please note that these chart formations set minimum measuring objectives, but not 'tops' as in limits.



Trading discipline would suggest taking the initial investment off the table here, but let at least some, if not most, of the trading profits run. The daily chart has a higher objective of around US$1,250 and we may very well see an intra-week push up to that level before the end of the year.

Tim and Ben seem determined to inflate an asset bubble, and a continuation into the year end and beyond is certainly not out of the question. The Fed established its repuation for recklessness in the bubble which they inflated from 2003 to 2007, which manifested in stocks and housing. Have they learned any lessons? It seems like only new ways of doing the same old things, and on a grander scale. Larry and Ben have not had an original thought since 1994, and Timmy is a 'useful pair of hands.'

We are entering the period when we would start to anticipate a pullback and consolidation, at least, if not a correction in what has been an extraordinary run. We would prefer this, than a parabolic high. But we have to emphasize that the formation on the charts is a measuring objective, a target if you will, but not necessarily a top.

Mitigating our outlook is the apparent attempt by the US monetary powers to inflate the equity bubble, possibly into year end. Otherwise the fundamentals on many of the financial instruments are looking a bit frothy.

While we do not touch our long term metals positions, as we have not done since 2001, we will vary the trades and leverage as the intermediate situation indicates. But it should be clear that our trading suits our particular age and outlook, and financial condition and needs, and quite frankly, nerves.

And our nerves are getting old, and the markets in general seem a bit 'on the edge.' Le Patron's capacity for risk tolerance is not as vibrant as in day's long past. Although we do confess to a restless desire to short the US equity market, and waiting is becoming an act of will.

Investors who are more aggressive or conservative, with differing time frames, will best seek individual investment advice as always from a qualified advisor (especially if you can find one who is thinking 'out of the box' that is.) We cannot and do not give any individual counsel, and merely look at the markets themselves, and discuss generic trading tactics, and sometimes our own positions.

Despite a very recent surge in popularity, gold and silver are hardly mainstream investments, and few understand them. This will change. But it has not changed yet.

We want to emphasize that 1225 is NOT our ultimate price objective or a top call. This is a minimum measuring objective from the breakout from an ascending triangle of 1225 on the weekly chart. IF you accept that an inverse H&S pattern can be a consolidation pattern, then 1275 is the minimum measuring objective.

What is our ultimate price? Well, to answer that, we would have to know how thoroughly the Fed and Treasury intend to debase the dollar. Further, we would need to have a honest accounting of the gold holdings of the US, and any allocations or encumbrances on them from leasing activity.

Without such knowledge forecasting a 'top' is difficult. But for now here is one target price from a favorite analyst, David Rosenberg.

America's Lost Decade in Equities

For the first time since the 1930's this decade represents negative returns for the SP500. Remarkably this chart represents nominal total returns.

Adjusted for the weaker dollar and inflation, the 'buy and hold' philosophy, especially for those nearing their retirements, has been a disaster. But it has been great times for speculators and insiders and the productive economy.

Part of the problem is with the 401k concept as a supplement if not replacement for pensions and savings, as well as portfolios for educational purposes. Their implementation offers too few choices for the average person. Do you wish to buy corporate stocks or corporate bonds? Or money market funds where the value is not guaranteed? Short term Treasuries, if you are fortunate.

The piling into corporate bonds in the US today may be in part driven by this lack of genuine choice, the seeking for 'conservative choices' and is setting up the many for staggering losses in the event that stagflation does indeed occur. Bond funds are no safe havens.

Two tax reforms, or at least stimulus, that the US might consider is increasing the annual allowance of $3,000 which the taxpayer may claim from prior capital losses against current income. The amount has been the same for many years, and an increase would help the average person clean their books up a bit. A second program might be stimulus, in allowing the average person to take for example $10,000 out of their IRA or 401k tax free for one time.

The Reformer will not do anything that does not benefit Wall Street, but if the US wishes to obtain some serious reforms in its financial system there is a rich ground to sow the seeds of renewal, given the neglect and abuse of the last twenty years.

The banks must be restrained, and the financial system reformed, and balance restored to the economy before there can be any sustained recovery.

Going the Way of AIG with Dollar Holders as Patsies

The Guidotti-Greenspan rule states that a nation's reserves should equal short-term (one-year or less maturity) external (foreign) debt, implying a ratio of reserves-to-short term debt of 1. The rationale is that countries should have enough reserves to resist a massive withdrawal of short term foreign capital.

The rule is named after Pablo Guidotti – Argentine former deputy minister of finance – and Alan Greenspan –former chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of the United States. Guidotti first stated the rule in a G-33 seminar in 1999, while Greenspan widely publicized it in a speech at the World Bank (Greenspan, 1999).

Guzman Calafell and Padilla del Bosque (2002) found that the ratio of reserves to external debt is a relevant predictor of an external crisis.

This is an interesting application of the Greenspan-Guidotti Rule by Porter Stansberry below because it includes the value of the gold at market prices, as well as the oil in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and all the foreign reserves on the books of the US against the total foreign debt owed in using the Greenspan-Guidotti rule for its default assessment.

Those who argue for a stronger dollar because of deflation due to domestic credit destruction overlook the reality of the yawning imablance of US debt to external creditors, and the need to deal with it without writing it off like a home mortage.

Yes, the US has lots of buildings, and minerals in the ground, and forests and proprietary software, and overpriced financial assets, and tranches of dodgy mortgages to sell. We are discussing AAA liquid assets here, without significant counterparty risk. Those peddling US debt instruments to Asia these days are getting a very cold reception.

What Porter Stansberry says is valid, with the important exception that the US still owns the world's reserve currency. Otherwise it would be well on its way to a hyperinflationary climax.

This is why we do not expect the default to be like the Lehman Brothers over-weekend implosion, nor as dramatic as the crisis in Dubai, or more historically the failure of the post-Soviet Russia. The US is too big to fail.

The dollar will devalue to unexpected lows, not with a bang but a whimper.

More AIG than Lehman, with high profile big-talking executives, self-serving accounting, bonuses to the perpetrators, de facto bailout and subsidies from frightened central bankers, and all that until the rest of the world can adjust. The US will most likely wallow in stagflation until it can get itself together again, barring a global conflict.

There are structural issues for sure. The US is still the consumer of the world's export products, especially manufactured goods. The problem is that they are paying for it with paper that is increasingly worthless. And it is militarily the only remaining superpower.

Do not expect this to be a straightfoward default. The US money center banks are wielding weapons of financial mass destruction, and are not afraid of gooning it up in the markets for real products, as they still exercise significant pricing power.

It may be our currency, but it's your problem.'' John Connolly, Treasury Secretary, in response to European anger at the 1971 US gold default

So, it will take time for the exporting nations to grow their domestic markets, and to find new customers at home and abroad. It will take time for the nations to agree on a new currency regime, as the US has now pulled the rug out from under them once again with the quantitative easing of the dollar. But that adjustment effort is now well underway. With regard to change, "It is not necessary to change. Your survival is not mandatory." - W. Edwards Deming

The downside of structural change after a long decline is that once it occurs, it is difficult to obtain one's prior reputation and position.

"When governments go bankrupt it's called "a default." Currency speculators figured out how to accurately predict when a country would default. Two well-known economists - Alan Greenspan and Pablo Guidotti - published the secret formula in a 1999 academic paper. That's why the formula is called the Greenspan-Guidotti rule.

The rule states: To avoid a default, countries should maintain hard currency reserves equal to at least 100% of their short-term foreign debt maturities. The world's largest money management firm, PIMCO, explains the rule this way: "The minimum benchmark of reserves equal to at least 100% of short-term external debt is known as the Greenspan-Guidotti rule. Greenspan-Guidotti is perhaps the single concept of reserve adequacy that has the most adherents and empirical support."

The principle behind the rule is simple. If you can't pay off all of your foreign debts in the next 12 months, you're a terrible credit risk. Speculators are going to target your bonds and your currency, making it impossible to refinance your debts. A default is assured.

So how does America rank on the Greenspan-Guidotti scale? It's a guaranteed default.

The U.S. holds gold, oil, and foreign currency in reserve. The U.S. has 8,133.5 metric tonnes of gold (it is the world's largest holder). That's 16,267,000 pounds. At current dollar values, it's worth around $300 billion. The U.S. strategic petroleum reserve shows a current total position of 725 million barrels. At current dollar prices, that's roughly $58 billion worth of oil. And according to the IMF, the U.S. has $136 billion in foreign currency reserves. So altogether... that's around $500 billion of reserves. Our short-term foreign debts are far bigger."

Porter Stansberry, The bankruptcy of the United States is now certain

Davidowitz: What Recovery? The US Consumer Is Struggling

Howard Davidowitz is our favorite retail analyst.

Appearance versus Reality is the theme in the Enron Nation.



And Winners of the Retail Apocalypse: Amazon, Walmart, Kohls and Dollar Tree.
Personally I like Costco, Amazon, and Lowes, because even thought they may not have the very lowest price, they provide exceptional value and a little something 'extra.'

David is probably right, because She-Who-Shops says he is, and is a hands-on expert.