Showing posts with label potemkin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label potemkin. Show all posts

20 March 2014

Celebrating Policy Errors And Corruption With Bogus Milestones in The Recovery™


Or Why Is Unemployment Falling Along With the Labour Participation Rate?

The pat answer from learned economists is that this is 'the new normal,' and 'structural.'    It is all part of an aging population gracefully moving into their comfortable retirement.   They say this even though people are working in great numbers into older age because they have little savings and pension security, and the real median income continues to stagnate.   And while corporations and the one percent reap rich profits and increases in income from the Fed's trickle down monetary stimulus.

So many odds things occurring.  We have a bear market in the price of gold, even while the physical supply of it is disappearing, and major benchmarks have been found to have been manipulated by the financial system.  Curiouser and curiouser.

The answer is that the government and their corporate partners are painting pictures of a recovery, and placing them along the highways and byways, in order to convince us that things are getting better.  In this Wonderland where nothing is real, perception is everything, and everything is its image.

This is why I first called this 'The Potemkin Economy' some time ago.

Ralph Dillon from Global Financial Data passed this along, and I thought this was interesting. The commentary is his.
If unemployment benefits were extended indefinitely would this chart look any different? Is the decline in labor participation due to the extension of federal unemployment benefits? Would we continue to see the duration of unemployment keep trending higher if it was?

This chart is amazing in many regards. First, the duration of consecutive weeks of unemployment has never been over the overall labor participation rate in 45 years of recorded statistics. Second, the parabolic increase in the duration of those unemployed is staggering starting in 2009. Third, we have never seen the two series in lock step as they currently are.

And finally, is the decline in how long someone is unemployed correlated to the drop in those who are actually employed? Shouldn’t the participation rate go up if the duration of those unemployed is improving? What will this chart look like in say 10 years?

I continue to be fascinated with employment in this country. It seems the importance of decade’s worth important economic statistics have been turned upside down. Further, they are being looked upon differently according to what message you are trying to send.


For example, the Federal Government has had a target of 6.5% unemployment. Four years ago this was considered a milestone of achievement for a broken economy. Yet yesterday, in testimony before congress, Fed Chair Janet Yellen, indicated that the unemployment target having been reached, is no longer a goal. It had been a goal since the unemployment rate reached its highs after the 2008 financial crisis.  If we reached that goal, then things must be going well, right?

Not if you look at this chart it doesn’t. The 45 year average of the duration of unemployment is 101 weeks. Today we are at 200 weeks! Since the crisis started, we have doubled the duration of time that those are unemployed stay unemployed. Not very good. But what about the improving economy we keep hearing about? More jobs right?

Wrong. The overall civilian labor force participation rate is at the lowest level in over 3 decades yet we are at 6.5% unemployment. What then are we going to set as our next goal?

If we keep setting goals that are meaningless then why are we setting them at all? If the economy is so good, then why are we continuing the Quantitative Easing program? Sure it’s been scaled back a bit, my inclination is that the easing is skewing the traditional statistics that we have been using to measure the economy for decades.

If something is truly broken, like the labor market, why not set out and fix it instead of making it worse and celebrating its bogus milestones that are truly failures. Who does Quantitative Easing help anyway. They say Main Street, but many feel Wall Street.

They say that facts and numbers do not lie. Only politicians do.
(and those who work in the service of power and the status quo, such as mainstream media pundits, academic and professional economists, and other Very Serious People of titles and great consequence. They like to use terms like 'the new normal' to prepare people for being economically abused and repressed until exhaustion and collapse. - Jesse.)

"Robbery, rape, and slaughter they falsely call empire; and where they create a desert, they call it peace."

Tacitus, Calgacus' Speech from Agricola



09 January 2014

The Roots of the Next Crisis, and the Dark Hallway Beyond


“Those who fail to exhibit positive attitudes, no matter the external reality, are seen as maladjusted and in need of assistance. Their attitudes need correction...

Suddenly, abused and battered wives or children, the unemployed, the depressed and mentally ill, the illiterate, the lonely, those grieving for lost loved ones, those crushed by poverty, the terminally ill, those fighting with addictions, those suffering from trauma, those trapped in menial and poorly paid jobs, those whose homes are in foreclosure or who are filing for bankruptcy because they cannot pay their medical bills, are to blame for their negativity.

The ideology justifies the cruelty of unfettered capitalism, shifting the blame from the power elite to those they oppress."

Chris Hedges

Here is a recent conversation I had with a friend about the current state of the US recovery.  As an accountant with a wide range of exposures, I enjoy hearing his perspective since I no longer have that sort of current insight into the corporate culture in America.  I have years of background running large businesses in corporations, and some forays into large scale M&A work, so I have seen quite a bit of it. The methods rarely change, merely the guises and degrees.

Here are excerpts from his side of the conversation with only one parenthetical comment of my own.

"I don’t think we’re seeing profits in a traditional sense. Instead, it appears to me that we’re watching a long, drawn out LBO’ing of America. It appears that companies are liquidating capital and returning it as opposed to earnings spreads on revenue.

It seems like we’re seeing the final blow-off phase that started with the stock option becoming the primary form of compensation for corporate talent. By drawing out the LBO, they re-stock their options each year with a guaranteed return thanks to the Fed and their own Treasury Departments.

The problem is that you can’t have systematic corporate buybacks with employment/economic growth as they create diametrically opposite outcomes. The more work I do, the more I conclude that the US economy has not expanded since 2006.

I was looking at mutual fund data the other day and it showed that people moved their fixed income money into domestic equity - $185 billion in liquidated bond funds to buy $175 billion in equity funds. This happened after the Fed announced tapering was on the table. Just like the gold market, I suspect that “someone” forced the liquidation of bond funds and herded the money into equity funds to keep the rally going.  (I think it is perfectly reasonable to flee bond funds at any time that interest rates are turning higher.  Bond funds often take it on the chin in such a deleveraging of a long term interest rate trend.   However, I think the whole taper thing was hyped and used by the wiseguys, as are most things these days by our financial masters of the universe. - Jesse)

Coincidentally, corporations used half a trillion in cash flow on buybacks. It’s a liquidity game but with limitations. What’s the next asset that can be liquidated or levered? They’re still working on gold but sometime soon, the price of gold will be set in the East, where the gold resides. Agricultural commodities are being liquidated but that ensures a drop in planting next year. Oil is too valuable on the geopolitical front to liquidate.

There are certainly winners in this economy but far more losers. At some point, the weight of the losers acts against the winners, many of whom are levered up with confidence. Corporations can liquidate equity capital but we all know how the LBO’d companies operated in the 1990’s. In many ways, they’ve gotten corporations to behave like consumers did in the 2000’s, only this time they’re trained to buy back their own stock. Every cycle has natural limits.

We know that corporate cash flow is no longer growing and we know that it’s more expensive to sell debt today than a year ago. We also know that the Fed sees the stock market as their proof of success. So how does this shakeout? If corporations are a lemon, how much juice can you squeeze out of the lemon?"

Although I do not wish to be an alarmist, I have to say that this trend of attempting to sustain the unsustainable has gone on longer than I had previously thought possible.

I am fairly sure that the next crisis will bring these things to a head and some sort of resolution. But therein also lies great danger. Philosophies that have grown time can have deep roots, and when faced with what to them is an intolerable change, can react somewhat excessively. They may even welcome the opportunity to act excessively and decisively, at least in their own minds, as the path to winning.

When a ruling subculture that has become accustomed to crushing and liquidating things for its own power and pleasure, whether it is natural resources, the environment, crops, animals, land, or social organizations, eventually runs out of things, it can become frustrated and angry in its seeming impotence to continue on, to keep expanding.

Indirectly and somewhat benignly at first, but with a growing efficiency and determination over time, it will begin with the weak and the defenseless, attacking and objectifying them, even in the most petty of ways and impositions. It will turn to its critics, and then everyone who is defined by them as 'the other.'

That is when a predatory social and economic philosophy can turn into pure fascism, and start liquidating people.  And finally it liquidates and consumes itself.

But really, no one wakes up one morning and suddenly decides, 'Today I will become a monster, and wantonly kill innocent women and children.'

Otherwise ordinary people get to that point slowly, one convenient rationalization for their 'necessary and expedient' behavior at a time. After all, they are the good people, they are the strong, they are the most successful and the favored.

 They are the entitled, and not these others who would seek to drain them, drag them back down. They are the champions of progress and achievement and civilisation, the hardest working, and the epitome of mankind.  

What could possibly go wrong? 

"He prompts you what to say, and then listens to you, and praises you, and encourages you. He bids you mount aloft. He shows you how to become as gods. Then he laughs and jokes with you, and gets intimate with you; he takes your hand, and gets his fingers between yours, and grasps them, and then you are his."

J. H. Newman, The AntiChrist

If you are one who thinks that the above 'could not possibly happen here,' and I am sure that there are many, you may wish to read the following vignette from modern US history. Alan Nasser, FDR's Response to the Plot to Overthrow Him

08 January 2014

The Recovery™ In One Chart


"A new tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules...

Such an economy kills. "

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Francis I


"When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the Bank [of the United States]...

You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table), I will rout you out."

Andrew Jackson

Corporatism by any other name, or brand...

h/t for the chart to those wild and crazy guys at GMU.

28 February 2012

Biderman: Real Time Economic Data Shows No Recovery, US Dollar Is a 'Phantom.'


"Gold is not a phantom currency as many say, it is the US currency that is the phantom."

Charles Biderman, February 27, 2012

Charles Biderman gives a step by step analysis of the key data that some say shows an 'economic recovery.'

Accounting tricks, statistical smoke and mirrors, and a stock rally fueled by Fed printing do not reflect the real state of the US economy.

There is evidence that the situation has stabilized.  The problem is that the stimulus which the Fed is providing is not directed towards productive activity sufficient to spark a genuine recovery with a rising median wage. Rather, it is being used to prop up a dysfunctional economy that is still rife with corruption, malinvestment, and insider dealings designed to transfer even more wealth to the top one percent.   And the prescription being offered by the perpetrators, for the maladies of their crisis, is to take more from the poor and the weak, and pay for an excess of fraud with their pains.

And those who know better, with the exception of a notable few, either stand aside and are silent, or sell their integrity to a partisan cause, self-interest, or the highest bidder.

The financial crisis has provided the excuse for what has the appearance of institutionalized looting by a powerful elite through a dual standard of justice and the steady debasement of the national currency. Neither austerity or stimulus will work until the economy is restructured and reformed.   But stagnation is achievable, as long as the dollar lasts.  Or until the great reckoning comes, and the grapes of wrath are pressed.




11 July 2011

Gold Drops Precipitously Just Prior to Obama's Press Conference on the Debt Ceiling



Gold soared this morning on a flight to safety from the European debt crisis.

Then suddenly it started dropping sharply around 10:30 NY time.

What could have happened?

Oh, the Bloomberg is reporting that Obama will be addressing the nation in a Press Conference around 11:00 AM.

It doesn't get much more obvious than this.

As the news commentators just noted, gold is flat and the Treasuries are rallying, so why worry?

My stock index shorts from Friday are doing well as this overextended rally continues to pull back. I took a portion of them off the table as the SP futures reach down to support around 1312. I also took the miners off in the first hour, and trimmed back the bullion plays a little after that.

I suspect the major players will reach some agreement on the debt ceiling by July 22, and throw a portion of the American public under the bus, to everyone's relief that a horrible crisis has been averted, while largely maintaining the real status quo and the primacy of the Wall Street monied interests.

It's MMT all the way. Not only Modern Monetary Theory, but Modern Management Theory, and the management of perceptions is everything in the Potemkin economy.

Later: I am watching Obama speak now, and it's pure theater. He said he wants a 'fair and balanced' solution. He is posturing quite a bit, but obviously concerned with giving his Republican colleagues cover with the more vocal wing of their constituency.

I have great sympathy for him, as he has inherited a terrible mess created in large part by his predecessors. The pigmen and their comrades are in a feeding frenzy, and the social fabric is stretched thin. Enough is never enough for them as they are addicted to greed and the will to power.

A bright fellow no doubt, but unseasoned by things like family, tradition, and the personal experience of hardship: a great story teller, a rationalizer, a perpetual outsider, and a thoroughly modern relativist. You have to keep your eye on what he does, rather than what he says. But that is a given with all modern managers.

No wonder gold and silver were hit so hard. They are the untarnished standards that stubbornly resist all rhetoric and relativism.




26 May 2009

Purchase Accounting Rules Set to Deliver $29 Billion Profit Windfall to JP Morgan and Other Banks


"It's Not the People Who Vote that Count; It's the People Who Count the Votes."
Josef Stalin

One of the many benefits of being a leading citizen of the Potemkin economy and a silent partner with the Treasury and Federal Reserve.

There is an analog to this in the tech sector, in which some companies may choose to write down the value of their components and subassembly inventories in fat quarters, and then take them as an improvement to their Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) in lean quarters, to boost EPS even as the top line revenues are flat to down.

And as for merger accounting, there are several companies showing excellent and consistent results using that rolling paintbrush of accounting embellishments.

Things are not always as they appear, especially when viewed through magic lantern of Wall Street.


RTTNews
JPMorgan likely to reap $29 Bln windfall on WaMu bad loans purchase
5/26/2009 8:29 AM ET

(RTTNews) - JPMorgan Chase & Co. stands to reap a $29 billion windfall due to an accounting rule that lets JPMorgan transform bad loans it purchased from Washington Mutual Inc. into income, the Bloomberg reported Tuesday.

Last year, the Seattle-based Washington Mutual, or WaMu, collapsed after it faced $19 billion of losses on soured mortgage loans and its credit rating was slashed, leaving it with insufficient liquidity to meet its obligations.

On September 25, 2008, JPMorgan Chase & Co. acquired all deposits, assets and certain liabilities of Washington Mutual Inc. for about $1.9 billion from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC.

The New York-based JPMorgan reportedly has used purchase accounting, which allows it to record impaired loans at fair value, marking down $118.2 billion of assets by 25%. JPMorgan took a $29.4 billion write down on WaMu's holdings, mostly for option adjustable-rate mortgages and home equity loans.

The purchase-accounting rule provides banks with an incentive to mark down loans they acquire as aggressively as possible. One of the benefits of purchase accounting is after marking down the assets, one can accrete them back in, which is said to be favorable over the long run.

Now, as borrowers pay their debts, the bank reportedly says it may gain $29.1 billion over the life of the loans in pretax income before taxes and expenses.

JPMorgan aside, Wells Fargo, PNC Financial Services Group Inc., and Bank of America Corp. are also poised to benefit from taking over home lenders Wachovia Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp. and National City Corp., the report said citing regulatory filings.


13 May 2009

On This Morning's Worse Than Expected Economic News...


It looks like those 'green shoots' which Bernanke saw were, in fact, merely fungus growing on the rot of the economy which the Federal Reserve has engineered through long term manipulation, mismanagement, and malinvestment.

People without jobs, and in particular jobs that pay well, are not able to buy consumables and take on additional credit, much less service the debt which they have on things which they have already consumed. Mirabile dictu!


U.S. stocks tumbled on Wednesday as worse-than-expected retail sales hurt shares in the sector, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc, and dampened recent enthusiasm over the economic outlook.

Government data showed sales at retailers fell for a second straight month in April, after a string of more upbeat reports suggested a turning point in the economic cycle.

And the prices of imports and 'real goods' are increasing as the dollar and financial assets continues to collapse.

We remember the stagflation of the 1970's very well. If you did not experience it as an adult with financial obligations it will be a new and instructive experience in monetary policy and the fallibility of economists and financial engineering.
The U.S. Import Price Index rose 1.6 percent in April. A 15.4 percent increase in import petroleum prices more than offset a 0.4 percent decline in the price index for nonpetroleum imports. Export prices also rose in April, increasing 0.5 percent.

Its too early to forecast for stagflation, but it remains a very realistic outcome.

06 May 2009

Red Pill or Blue Pill?



You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.

You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."

Morpheus in The Matrix


Blue Pill

Dick Bove was on Bloomberg Television this morning justifying a bullish outlook for the big banks, and the Bank of America in particular.

As you know, the story is that Bank of America has to raise many billions of dollars in additional capital according to the stress tests.

Dick Bove reasons that Bank of America will raise this additional capital, handwaving the costs and any contingencies a bit.

This additional capital will be leveraged, so Dick believes, in profitable transactions in trading, lending, and the extension of credit.

These transactions will generate a spectacular boom in bank profits. Mo' capital, mo' profits. Just do the math and including plenty of leverage.

And as we all know, more credit means economic growth and national prosperity.


Red Pill

The problem that the financial system has is an outsized financial sector with too much capacity for credit and financial assets. This excess capacity led to speculation and extension of credit in deals where the risk was not adequately balanced.

Hot money chases unreasonable risks. Too much capacity lowers the bars for deals which cannot possibly be profitable in any realistic model. Bubbles tend to distort the models for growth assumptions.

The only way to achieve a sustained recovery is to reform the financial system, break up the big banks, and return to a more balanced economy.


The elite and their acolytes seem to believe that by sustaining the illusion of the Financial Matrix that we create a confidence that will support a national economic system that is based on a credit bubble and a mass illusion of wealth based on paper.

The money center banks are the instruments of national policy, and the power to control not only the domestic economy but the nations of the world.

All we have to do is believe, and act as though it were true. After all, its so confusing, who can understand it? Better to just believe.

Can we delude ourselves to prosperity? Can a powerful nation and otherwise intelligent people be that venal, faithless and craven?

Yes we can. We have been doing it for years. And it can only continue if we gain more control over the real world and the people in it, and bend them to our increasingly irrational will.

The triumph of the will.