SP 500 and NDX September Futures Daily Charts

Remember that this is a quadruple witch option expiration week for US equities.

SP 500



NDX

The Marriage of Mercantilism and Corporatism: When Free Trade Is Not 'Free'

"The consequences of this policy are also stark and simple: in effect, China is taxing imports while subsidizing exports, feeding a huge trade surplus. You may see claims that China’s trade surplus has nothing to do with its currency policy; if so, that would be a first in world economic history. An undervalued currency always promotes trade surpluses, and China is no different." Paul Krugman

And he is exactly right. As regular readers know this matter of Chinese mercantilism and its toleration and acceptance by the West has been a key observation and objection here since 2000. Any economist who does not understand that devaluing and then maintaining an artificially low currency peg with a trading partner distorts the nature of that trade should review their knowledge of algebra.

Sophisticated oligarchs do not need to send real tanks against their people. They can accomplish the same objectives using fraud, debt, and corruption. Control the supply of money and care not who makes the laws. But it helps to have the lawmakers and regulators on the payroll.

It was in 1994 during the Clinton Administration that China was permitted to obtain full trading partner "Most Favored Nation" status, while vaguely promising to float their recently devalued currency some day, and address the human rights issues that were endogenous to their non-democratic, totalitarian government.

"From 1981 to 1993 there were six major devaluations in China. Their amounts ranged from 9.6 percent to 44.9 percent, and the official exchange rate went from 2.8 yuan per U.S. dollar to 5.32 yuan per U.S. dollar. On January 1, 1994, China unified the two-tier exchange rates by devaluing the official rate to the prevailing swap rate of 8.7 yuan per U.S. dollar." Sonia Wong, China's Export Growth

This served Mr. Clinton's constituents in Bentonville quite well, and has some interesting implications for the Chinese campaign contributions scandals. It supported the Rubin doctrine of a 'strong dollar' while facilitating the financialization of the US economy and the continuing decline of the middle class wage earners, under pressure to surrender a standard of living achieved at great cost. "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Currency Collapse." and China's Mercantilism: Selling Them the Rope

Not to limit this, George W. ratified the arrangement when he took office, and so it has gone on for almost fifteen years now, with China 'taxing imports while subsidizing exports' to the disadvantage of its western trading partners.

I expect certain economists who are serving their Chinese clients to make their case to muddy the waters, since this is what they are paid to do. But the silence of the many in this matter was so striking as to be incredible, almost mind boggling. But given the acquiescence of the many in the face of equally absurd theories such as the impossibility of a national housing bubble or pervasive market fraud in naturally efficient markets, we should not be surprised.

Even now someone as knowledgeable as Mr. Krugman can distinguish the inappropriateness of the Chinese unfair trade practice "in current environment" through currency manipulation with prior periods, as if it was all right back then, but somehow is no longer acceptable because of the current economic slump. How can one argue with a straight face that a currency peg that continues for years is not inherently unfair, and a contributing factor to economic imbalances, given the assumption that it imposes a de facto subsidy for exports and penalty for imports?

This is not a trivial distinction but tied to a generational assault on the US middle class. Class Warfare and the Decline of the West.

Perhaps it is a good time to reconsider the principle of the 'neutrality of money' with respect to exchange rates controls and global trade in a purely fiat reserve currency regime as was done with the 'efficient markets hypothesis.' Currency Manipulation and World Trade: A Caution. China is certainly standing western capitalism on its ear and giving it a spin. But this is not without historical precedent, and was predicted by V.I. Lenin himself. I would enjoy this spectacle perhaps if I were observing it from a distance in time.

In a global trade environment tied to external standards such as gold or silver, such egregious imbalances could not grow so large because the metals would impose a certain market discipline requiring a reconciliation and adjustment before monetary excesses became a potentially systemic catastrophe as pointed out so skillfully by Hugo Salinas-Price in Gold Standard: Protector and Generator of Jobs.

The policy errors of the Greenspan and Bernanke Fed, and the outrageously unrealistic if not romantic and utopian theories promulgated by economists about self-correcting markets make me, to borrow a phrase, want to 'bang my head against a wall.'

NYT
China, Japan, America
By Paul Krugman
September 12, 2010

Last week Japan’s minister of finance declared that he and his colleagues wanted a discussion with China about the latter’s purchases of Japanese bonds, to “examine its intention” — diplomat-speak for “Stop it right now.” The news made me want to bang my head against the wall in frustration.

You see, senior American policy figures have repeatedly balked at doing anything about Chinese currency manipulation, at least in part out of fear that the Chinese would stop buying our bonds. Yet in the current environment, Chinese purchases of our bonds don’t help us — they hurt us. The Japanese understand that. Why don’t we?

Some background: If discussion of Chinese currency policy seems confusing, it’s only because many people don’t want to face up to the stark, simple reality — namely, that China is deliberately keeping its currency artificially weak.

The consequences of this policy are also stark and simple: in effect, China is taxing imports while subsidizing exports, feeding a huge trade surplus. You may see claims that China’s trade surplus has nothing to do with its currency policy; if so, that would be a first in world economic history. An undervalued currency always promotes trade surpluses, and China is no different.

And in a depressed world economy, any country running an artificial trade surplus is depriving other nations of much-needed sales and jobs. Again, anyone who asserts otherwise is claiming that China is somehow exempt from the economic logic that has always applied to everyone else.

So what should we be doing? U.S. officials have tried to reason with their Chinese counterparts, arguing that a stronger currency would be in China’s own interest. They’re right about that: an undervalued currency promotes inflation, erodes the real wages of Chinese workers and squanders Chinese resources. But while currency manipulation is bad for China as a whole, it’s good for politically influential Chinese companies — many of them state-owned. And so the currency manipulation goes on.

Time and again, U.S. officials have announced progress on the currency issue; each time, it turns out that they’ve been had. Back in June, Timothy Geithner, the Treasury secretary, praised China’s announcement that it would move to a more flexible exchange rate. Since then, the renminbi has risen a grand total of 1, that’s right, 1 percent against the dollar — with much of the rise taking place in just the past few days, ahead of planned Congressional hearings on the currency issue. And since the dollar has fallen against other major currencies, China’s artificial cost advantage has actually increased.

Clearly, nothing will happen until or unless the United States shows that it’s willing to do what it normally does when another country subsidizes its exports: impose a temporary tariff that offsets the subsidy. So why has such action never been on the table?

One answer, as I’ve already suggested, is fear of what would happen if the Chinese stopped buying American bonds. But this fear is completely misplaced: in a world awash with excess savings, we don’t need China’s money — especially because the Federal Reserve could and should buy up any bonds the Chinese sell.

It’s true that the dollar would fall if China decided to dump some American holdings. But this would actually help the U.S. economy, making our exports more competitive. Ask the Japanese, who want China to stop buying their bonds because those purchases are driving up the yen. (Cui bono, Mr. Krugman, cui bono? - Jesse)

Aside from unjustified financial fears, there’s a more sinister cause of U.S. passivity: business fear of Chinese retaliation.

Consider a related issue: the clearly illegal subsidies China provides to its clean-energy industry. These subsidies should have led to a formal complaint from American businesses; in fact, the only organization willing to file a complaint was the steelworkers union. Why? As The Times reported, “multinational companies and trade associations in the clean energy business, as in many other industries, have been wary of filing trade cases, fearing Chinese officials’ reputation for retaliating against joint ventures in their country and potentially denying market access to any company that takes sides against China.”

Similar intimidation has surely helped discourage action on the currency front. So this is a good time to remember that what’s good for multinational companies is often bad for America, especially its workers.

So here’s the question: Will U.S. policy makers let themselves be spooked by financial phantoms and bullied by business intimidation? Will they continue to do nothing in the face of policies that benefit Chinese special interests at the expense of both Chinese and American workers? Or will they finally, finally act? Stay tuned

Net Asset Values of Certain Precious Metal Trusts and Funds

Gold and Silver Charts

Gold Daily Chart



Gold Weekly Chart



Silver Daily Chart

SP 500 and NDX September Futures Daily Charts

Drifting up on low volumes in a gentle ongoing short squeeze.

These types of markets typically run into a hard event and crumple. The timing may be problematic for the punters, and so the gentle short squeeze is fed daily.

The equity market commentary on the US financial news networks would make Baghdad Bob blush. I think the wiseguys are getting a little nervous because mom and pop seem to be sitting this one out.

SP 500



NDX

Soaring Corporate Profits As US Worker Pay for Productivity Hits Record Lows

Two sets of charts tell the story.

The problem is that when workers are pressed to the wall on pay they lose the ability to consume without taking on debt. And at some point the debt leverage mechanism for consumption breaks down.

Perhaps the problem is related to the one Wall Street is now confronting. How do you continue on in business after having impoverished, alienated, or driven away most of your clientele in the heat of a short term greed enabled by a corrupted political and regulatory system?

Those who were around in the late 1970's will recall the absolute disrepute in which equities were held by the public after the grinding bear market of 1973-74. Pit traders spent the better part of the day practicing their origami skills, for lack of serious 'outside participation.' Skinning each other when you have run out of greater fools is truly a zero sum game.

Weather report: Cloudy, with a chance of whirlwinds.



Fat profits, slim wages: the fruits of monetary bubbles and trickle down economics.



Charts courtesy of ContraryInvestor.

US Ranks Fourth In Global Competitiveness

I think the biggest surprise for US readers might be how high the US ranks in global competitiveness, and the countries that rank the highest. And of course there is the absence of China in the top ten. Shocking when viewed through the lens of an artificially managed-to-the-dollar currency pair.

Obviously having low paid and poorly treated workers is not the primary qualification for global competitiveness, at least in this national scaling. But it does seem to be a preoccupation of a significant portion of the Anglo-american crony capitalist elements which have never quite reconciled themselves to the laws against indentured servitude.

GenevaLunch
World Economic Forum Competitiveness Report: US falls to 4th place
10 September 2010

Geneva, Switzerland - Switzerland leads the pack, with Sweden and Singapore in second and third places respectively, and the United States in fourth in the latest edition of the World Economic Forum (WEF) Competitiveness Report, published Thursday 9 September. The US has slipped two places, after being overtaken in 2009 by Switzerland. The WEF attributes the lower ranking to “In addition to the macroeconomic imbalances that have been building up over time, there has been a weakening of the United States’ public and private institutions, as well as lingering concerns about the state of its financial markets.”

The report uses two sources: publicly available data and a survey of business leaders, with 13,500 business people in 139 “economies” queried for this year’s report. It contains more than 100 indicators for each country, part of the detailed country reports. “The survey is designed to capture a broad range of factors affecting an economy’s business climate. The report also includes comprehensive listings of the main strengths and weaknesses of countries, making it possible to identify key priorities for policy reform,” notes the WEF press release on the new report.

Nordic countries remain strong, says the WEF, with four of them in the top 15: Sweden (2), Finland (7), Denmark (9) and norway (14). China “continues to lead the way among the top developing countries” according to the report: it improved two places and is now ranked 27.

North African countries are competing more strongly, with several of them in the top 50.

Switzerland ranked number one in several areas in the report:

institutions, infrastructure, health and primary education, and financial market development. It was in the top five for labour market efficiency, technological readiness and innovation, giving it one of the top five slots in seven of the 12 indicators.

The most problematic factors in doing business in Switzerland remain inefficient government bureaucracy, tax regulations, restrictive labor regulations and access to financing.

Read the full report here

Gold Daily Chart

Gold corrected, somewhat predictably today, after a significant run higher and having left a 'gravestone doji' candle in yesterday's action.

There is decent support at the 1240 level. Let's see if the yellow dog can find its footing there.

SP 500 and NDX September Futures Daily Charts

The US equity markets were in rally mode on light volumes until this afternoon when news that Deutsche Bank will be raising a substantial amount of capital (9 billion euros or roughly 11 billion US dollars) through a share sale took the wind out of the sails of the financials which had been leading the charge higher.

Deutsche Bank, aka Buba, is considered the 'gem' of German banks, and this dilution of almost 30 per cent came as a shock as it is almost three times as much as was expected if they were making a significant increase in their 30% ownership of Deutsche Postbank AG that has been discussed. It brings into question what is coming out of the Basel III discussions, as well as further speculation about what bad debts remain undiscounted on the banks' balance sheets.

SP 500



NDX

The Nasdaq 100 futures chart in particular shows the significance of the resistance trend that the NDX faces right now.