Showing posts with label SDR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SDR. Show all posts

23 October 2012

Currency Wars Part II


"All war is based on deception. Of all those close to the commander, none is more intimate than the secret agent; of all rewards none more liberal than those given to secret agents; of all matters none is more confidential than those relating to secret operations."

Sun Tzu


"Let Hercules himself do what he may,
The cat will mew, and dog will have his day."

William Shakespeare, Hamlet

There is a currency war underway.

The international trade clearing mechanisms are tottering. Countries are using their economic power, their banks and currencies, as a part of overall foreign as well as domestic policy.

This is a huge source of the tensions and problems which are are seeing both economically and militarily in the world today.

The current trade system based on the US dollar reserve currency is not sustainable. It has had a good long run, but like the euro it has reached the end of its rope. The US cannot continue to print enough money and increase its debt balance through trade any further. See Triffin Dilemma. Yes I am familiar with Eichengreen's counter argument.

And I am also aware of the already written and vetted proposals for a 'single world currency' with independent local governments,  an arrangement which is even more fallacious and ill founded than the euro.  Yes I know that there could be a series of agreements that could kick this down the road five or ten years.   But something has got to give.  The charade is getting a bit thin but the deception must go on.

I still think the only tenable solution, if one still wishes to cling to the notion of 'free trade' internationally, is an SDR based on a wider basket of currencies with a gold and silver component.  And I am of the opinion as you know that much of these international theatrics and sword hammering is just the 'negotiations' phase with regard to the composition of the new SDR, and the ownership of its maintenance.

There are some who would treat the dollar as an arm of the military strategy, but that becomes a bit dramatic, in the Dr. Strangelove sense, but is nevertheless a good source of Defense Department consulting fees for those who promote the idea.

And I would hope that it goes without saying that the currency war is intimately tied in with the oil/energy situation, via the petrodollar. If you are going to send your country into multiple preemptive wars, one might take the time to understand the reasons why they are doing it. It is about the oil, and the positioning for it.

The problem is that there is no mechanism in place to bring the disputing parties together for an expedient resolution, given their conflicting interests. And those interests run deep, particularly for the Anglo-American banking cartel in NY and London. The dollar is the basis of their power.

And so we are locked in a 'currency war,' a resolution of differences in interest by other, less destructive, means than war itself. After all, nine-tenths of diplomacy is economic, if money is power.

If this notion is alien to you, then one can sympathize, because it is like watching an opera in a foreign tongue without a libretto to help you to understand the action on the stage. To have such knowledge of the basic plotline might not only help your understanding, it could be good for your investment portfolio.  For in this currency war, your accounts and your savings are cannon fodder.

If you wish to read one pivotal post on the subject read the first part of this: Currency Wars.

If you click on the label 'currency wars' at the bottom of this post, it will bring up all the other posts here that touch on that subject, some admittedly only tangentially.

I think the currency war will intensify quite a bit before it resolves.  I have been tracking this since 1999.  It is the reason I first became interested in gold.  I went looking for something like it, and only gold really fit, and to a lesser extent silver.

Gold and silver are intimately involved in the unfolding currency war, because they take no sides, and have no counterparty risk.  No one can print them.  And this is why I think GATA is right, not because of the evidence they have, which is more substantial than one might suspect given obsessive secrecy and the disinformation campaigns, but because it is exactly what one would do if there was to be a currency war, and such things as gold and silver existed.   It is basic strategy of war:  seek to control the high ground.  And along with oil, gold and silver are strategic high ground in a currency war.  And the first victim in a war is the truth.

If one does not understand these things, and the scope of what is happening with the dollar and the euro, then the significance of the important things that are happening will be missed and dismissed.  People will connect the dots that they see and draw their pictures accordingly and they will be wrong. And what is particularly Machiavellian is that some of that is being done by intent.

And even with all sorts of technical trading knowledge, one will be in the dark, literally be fighting 'the last war,' in their understanding of what is happening in the world as it is today.


05 September 2012

Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Charts - Russia Stockpiling Gold, Likely for a New Trading Currency



The markets in general paused before the ECB announcement tomorrow and the Non-Farm Payrolls number in the US on Friday.

Early today there was a violent 7.6 magnitude earthquake in Costa Rica, but fortunately the damage was contained, there were few deaths, and there were no tsunamis. This is good news.

FedEx warned last night which is an indication that the real economy is lagging. But in today's high powered money economy where the market is the economy, that may not matter in the short term. When the currency and the economy become disconnected, life can get wild on the tails of probability, and unlikely things can happen.

Why Is Russia Stockpiling Gold? - MarketWatch

Perhaps it is due to the effort by the BRICs to reconstitute the SDR, with some gold in the basket of currencies, as a major instrument for international trade when the US dollar falters as the world's reserve currency. It is the most important thing that no one is even discussing.

Big things are underway behind the scenes, the kind of sea change that everyone understands after the fact, but almost no one sees coming, especially those whose gaze is fixed from within deep wells of subjectivity.
"Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rise and fall, and you can foresee the future, too." Marcus Aurelius
The only certainty is change. Let's see what happens.





17 May 2012

Devaluing the Dollar - Against What?


When people talk about devaluing the dollar, as opposed to reissuing it completely, the natural question is, against what? What would one devalue it against officially if you do not wish to reinstitute a formal gold standard, which is clearly the preference of the Western central bank.

One likely candidate might be the SDR issued as a new currency for global trade, and for the pricing of international goods and commodities.

The major bone of contention as I have pointed out before would be the new 'basis' for the SDR. What Will the World's Reserve Currency Become?  The BRICs are adamant for the inclusion of additional currencies and gold and silver to make a portfolio that is less weighted to the US, Europe, and England.

A country would have the option to retain their own national currency for domestic use.

This is regards to devaluation as opposed to a hyperinflation and reissuance in which case old dollars would be scrapped for 'new dollars' with a couple of zeroes knocked off.

A friend sent this information about the US Post Office my way today. The speculation on the 'new composition' of the SDR is mine. I am assuming that the number of Euro countries decreases.

The US Post Office is using US$ to SDR conversion tables for international mail insurance --> US Postal Service US$ to SDR Policy and Tables

Earliest reference I could find to when the USPS started pricing in SDRs is 2009, which is well after the initial financial crisis.

IMF publishes daily tables on SDR values--> IMF SDR Daily Tables

Quick calc: at today's SDR rate of 1.52 SDR to 1 US$, if a new global dollar like currency was issued, then a current $1 US would buy you 66 cents of that new currency.

This is about a 34% drop in the $ value.

And that is probably best case scenario, since the daily SDR rate is priced
relative to 3 other currencies. If the US$ were to take a pounding prior to
issuance of a new currency, the exchange rate would be even less favorable to $ holders.

Summary: The pricing mechanism for replacing the greenback is in place. As
your anxiety level rises on the $, feel free to check daily to see what your bank deposits would be worth after a bank "holiday".

29 November 2011

Currency Wars: The Anglo-American Century and Why the Financial Engineers Hate Gold and Silver



"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."

Antoine de Saint Exupéry

'Nominal GDP targeting' is a way of raising the Fed's inflation target without admitting to it explicitly.

Nominal GDP means that one can meet their growth target simply by inflating the money supply to make up the difference between 'real growth' and 'headline growth.'  Some parties are raising NGDP as the next policy initiative from the Federal Reserve.

NGDP targeting is so obvious and clumsy that I doubt that the Fed will try and hide their enormous efforts at monetization of the debt under such a small fig leaf, as Jim Rickards suggests, except to direct attention away from their more serious efforts.   The growth in money supply would be apparent to many and the Internet would be used to spread the word.   No, a more clever and covert attempt at persuasion is required, and more in keeping with the Bernanke Fed's penchant for secrecy.

I think the major monetization is already occurring in the Eurodollar markets, and an ongoing stealth bailout of European debt, in order to save the big money center banks at home and broaden the reach of the Dollar.

And this is why the Fed stopped reporting on Eurodollars some years ago, as a component of M3. It was to pave the way for the monetary equivalent of a financial neo-con, to addict European governance to the US dollar and pave the way for a stronger position for the dollar as a one world currency.

Money is power, and the ability to control the distribution and value of money and wealth is power in its most refined and effective form. One only needs relatively small armies to retain the power to control the money in order to subordinate vast resources and peoples if you can control their definition of wealth and the distribution of money, and all that follows from it.  

If you are able to create money at will, and give it to your friends and allies with even relative discretion, you are able to confiscate, without visible effort, the labor and wealth of every person who holds that currency, wherever they are and however they seek to protect it. It is the end of sovereignty and the right to private ownership of all goods and property that are valued by that currency. And it is a power too great to be held inviolate by any small group of men with the ability to act in secret.

I believe that the original purpose of this effort to shape the world economy was well-intentioned, or at least was represented as such to many participants as the logical solution to the devastating wars that repeatedly bloodied the last century.  

Most of what is transpiring now has not been planned, but events make the moment, and moment gives rise to the man.  And history shows us that too much power in too few hands never fails to end in exploitation.  With the rise of a single world super-power, no matter how good it might have been at its heart, the tide of corruption rose with it.  This is why central planning invariably fails.

The dominant global currency regime 'could' come in the form of the SDR for global trade if the composition of the SDR continues to contain a significant dollar-pound component.  Yes, the IMF has the ability to 'print' SDRs, but the SDR is a currency for use between nations, and its value is linked to a basket of individual domestic currencies.   Hence, it cannot be printed limitlessly, but must be linked to the value something else, some external standard.

Here is a prior blog entry here that explains the struggle for the SDR that is now occurring.   Even the 'reformed' basis for the SDR is ludicrous, with its over-representation of the dollar and the pound.  And now proceeds the dismantling and pacification of the eurozone.  And the hysterical antagonism by the Western bankers against the inclusion of gold and silver in the SDR basket as proposed by the BRICs.

Here is a broader overview of what I call the Currency Wars.

A slightly different plan has been underway for Asia, whose economies have become addicted to export production for US dollar paper, which makes up a huge portion of their reserves and financial system.

At some point those Eurodollars may come home, in the event that Europe finds a way out of its dilemma that was caused in part by the US banks and hedge funds, and of course Europe's own political weakness and greed. And the Fed is confident they have a way to stem that tide of dollars 'back in the system.'

But they do not expect this to happen, because the ratings agencies and the funds have the power to submit any government to a relentless credit assault on their sovereign debt.

Have you ever bothered to wonder why there have been no real investigations and prosecutions of the bankers and the credit ratings agencies?  And why they have been permitted to continue to operate, largely unimpeded?  The credibility trap is one explanation, but it fails to include so many other seemingly random events. Some of the banks may have become instruments of state policy, too big and important to prosecute. They and the state are becoming one.

As I have suggested in the past, the model has been to bring the system to a crisis, and then to have the bankers' representatives make an 11th hour 'offer which they cannot refuse' to the people of the nation, as they did in the adoption of TARP in the US.  'Adopt our plan, or suffer the consequences.'  

And I believe that the Anglo-American banking cartel will make this same play again, but this time with Europe and the world.  Financial crises are an effective tool in the mass redistribution of wealth and power, and often done in secret, making their appearance only at the offering of terms.

In a remarkably effective ploy of misdirection and mass persuasion, the kleptocrats and oligarchs have focused the attention and the anger of the middle class on the 'welfare state,' the poor and the elderly and the weak, under the moralistic banner of austerity. Meanwhile they are scooping up the income and wealth of nations for the top one percent, who are ironically portrayed as champions of freedom.

The sticking points in the US financiers plan are the key commodities, precious metals like gold and silver, and of course food and oil. It is a pivotal point of control that will become much more prominent in the future.  China and Russia will play that card with some of their BRIC allies.  But in the short term the Anglo-Americans are solidifying their power in the oil rich Middle East, since like gold and silver, oil is a powerful piece in this global chess game. But I do not think they can just 'take it' for themselves. And so the Mideast will remain a very important piece on the board. Perhaps it will be carved up, and perhaps it will be fought over, in the valley of Megiddo.

To paraphrase von Clausewitz, 'Currency war is the continuation of politics by other means,' especially when global military war has been rendered economically unviable in the post-atomic age.

Those who believe that China and Russia will oppose this to the bitter end believe in the purity of those regimes, and their ability to resist the temptation to participate in a deal that gives them rule over their portion of the globe. Since for the most part they are already oligarchies, this does not seem likely. The apparent disagreement and contention now may be more of a discussion of terms and territories than principles.

It may devolve into a number of popular revolutions, or even the rise of a worldly power unlike anything seen before, a new Rome. Or something else might occur. What that is, obviously no one can say with certainty for now.

A daunting set of prospects one might say, as Woody Allen once noted in his Speech to Graduates:  "More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly."  

We can take great comfort that we are not the first generation to face difficulties, and what appear to be fearsome odds.  So often when they appeared to be at the very height of their power, great empires have tumbled, and the spirit has endured and risen once again.  As Dostoevsky noted, "If they drive God from the earth, we shall shelter Him underground."

But for now, if you at least understand the objective of the game and the roles of the players, what is happening on the field can begin to make more sense. 

Even if we cannot yet see it, the greatest probability remains that the monied interests will fail in their overreach and pride, but many ordinary people will be harmed in the process.  And our goal is to do what we can to limit the damage inflicted upon ourselves and our families, and our neighbors, and associate with like-minded individuals, to try to restore some semblance of civility and justice for our grandchildren.

This currency war is happening now, and it is something new in the history of warfare, because I do not believe that a fiat currency regime has ever existed before to this extent on a global scale, with a mutually destructive threat like nuclear power dampening the impulse to wide scale military conflict.

But as in all war, some things never change.

"When the rich wage war, it is the poor who die."

Jean-Paul Sartre

At some point the dawn will come, but first the darkest hour. Our business is not to surrender to discouragement, and cooperate with evil,  but to carry on in our missions, whatever they may be, as God gives us light.

"When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible, but in the end, they always fall — think of it, always."

Mohandas K. Gandhi

The ascendancy of evil in the world is a shameful episode in history; the triumph of dark powers in claiming our souls for all time, without end, is a tragedy.

In the meantime, here is an exposition of 'Nominal GDP targeting' so you can become familiar with it, in case it does make an appearance.




15 November 2010

IMF Reveals New SDR Weighting Tied to the "Big Four" In Rebuff to BRICs



The 'Washington-based' IMF chose the status quo, merely tinkering slightly with the dollar-euro-pound-yen balance in its SDR. The Anglo-American financiers threw a bone to the Europeans with a slight increase. Japan retained its place in the colonial powers club. I find it almost incredible that the UK remains a financial power to the exclusion of the BRICs.

I cannot imagine that Russia and China will be pleased with this rebuff to their concerns, although they were granted more of the trappings of power at the G20.

Now that the SDR is off the table as a broadly acceptable replacement for the dollar reserve currency regime, at least for the next five years, we might expect more regionalization of trade and the formation of new trading blocs. This implies less financial stability as the developing and commodity nations begin to rebel against the current foundations of global finance that continue to subject them to the monetary policies of the Big Four: US, Europe, UK and Japan.

As US analysts are so fond of saying, But what choice do they have? Time to open the door and let us in so we can set up a banking system for you such as that which has destroyed the economies of the developed nations.

Such are the burdens of financial leadership that 'bind your sons to exile to serve your captives needs.' And so it begins all over again.

Bloomberg
IMF Lowers Dollar, Yen Weights in Its SDR Valuation Basket, Increases Euro
By Candice Zachariahs
Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM ET

The International Monetary Fund reduced the weighting of the U.S. dollar and the yen and increased that of the euro in its Special Drawing Rights valuation basket after its regular five-year review.

The value of the SDR, which the IMF created in 1969 to supplement its member countries official reserves, will continue to be based on a basket of currencies comprised of the dollar, euro, yen and pound, the fund said in an e-mailed statement. UBS AG, the world’s second-largest foreign-exchange trader, said in June that the fund may include the Australian and Canadian dollars in the SDR basket this year, boosting demand for the commodity-backed currencies.

“There’s a long-term trend towards less U.S. dollars and more euro in terms of where central banks are putting their reserves, and this is consistent with that,” said Joseph Capurso, a currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia in Sydney. “There was some talk of the IMF putting in other currencies like the Aussie, but they’ve kept to the big four.”

The greenback’s weighting declined to 41.9 percent compared with 44 percent after a 2005 review, the fund said in its statement dated Nov. 15. The euro’s share rose to 37.4 percent from 34 percent. The yen’s fell to 9.4 percent from 11 percent, while the pound was little changed at 11.3 percent. SDRs are the Washington-based lender’s unit of account.

The new valuations will be effective Jan. 1, the fund said.

15 September 2010

On the Edge of History: Will Europe Join in Promoting the SDR as the Global Reserve Currency?


There is a tide in the affairs of men.
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
On such a full sea are we now afloat,
And we must take the current when it serves,
Or lose our ventures.

Julius Caesar: Act 4, scene 3, 218–224

China and Russia and some of the other developing nations have been proposing a reformulated SDR, with less US dollar content, a broader representation of currencies, and the inclusion of gold and silver, as a suitable replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency.

The US and UK are opposing the SDR as replacement to the US dollar as the new global reserve currency. They prefer to delay and postpone the discussions, and to maintain the status quo for as long as is possible to support their primacy in the financial markets. Control of the money supply is a huge hand on the levers of financial and political power.

It will be most interesting to see where the European Union comes out on this issue, especially in light of the recent drubbing that their banks have taken via dodgy dollar assets and a vicious dollar short squeeze, alleviated by a rescue from the Federal Reserve. It could have gone otherwise, and that provides things to think about. No one wishes to be at the mercy of a small group of unelected financial engineers who are closely aligned with an equally small set of Anglo-American banks operating with a somewhat opaque discretion. Or the goodwill of totalitarian governments who are acting aggressively from their own mercantilist self-interest for that matter.

One hears things. A deal being offered to Germany by the financial interests, for example, as a counterbalance to sentiment for greater latitude and independence in the EU. The lines of discussion move, and sometimes blur. Currency wars are the continuation of diplomacy, and possibly a revival of the cold war, by other means, to paraphrase Clausewitz. And a chilling fog is rolling over the landscape. This is what the timeless metal has been telling us, as it sounds an historic warning.

This is just the latest episode in a long unfolding macro change I have been calling Currency Wars after the Chinese best seller authored by Song Hongbing in 2007. I viewed it as the definitive spike in the theory of The End of History by Fukuyama.

It will continue to proceed slowly, at least for now, but such events tend to accelerate and sometimes dramatically as they progress. However the longer term implications for a change to the de facto Bretton Woods arrangement in place since Nixon closed the gold window in 1971, are enormous and yet little remarked yet by conventional economists, who too often prefer to glare at photons, gaping in the light. It has all the hallmarks of a classic conflict yet unfolding.

Rather than standing fast on an unsustainable status quo, as noted in Triffin's Dilemma, that serves the special interests of a wealthy few, the US might be well served to reform its banks, and balance its economy between service and industry, and stand once again for independent freedom and the common good, rather than narrow power and greed of the monied interests, and their willing tools and frivolous assistants. That is to trust in the wisdom and altruism of a people and their leaders who have of late shown a greater propensity to greed, deceit, and self-destruction. And so I say we must be in God's hands, because I recoil from Caesar's deathly grasp.

Some worry about deflation and inflation. Those outcomes are both hedged easily enough. I am more concerned about the next global holocaust of human destruction, and the bonfire of the vanities yet to come. That is history.

Financial Times
Germany asks US to give up its IMF veto
By Alan Beattie in Washington
September 14 2010 22:31

The US should give up its veto over important decisions in the International Monetary Fund in return for Europe accepting a smaller say, Germany has proposed.

The suggestion, which experts say will be strongly opposed by the US, addresses a politically highly symbolic dispute about voting power and seats on the fund’s executive board. Shifting power towards emerging market countries is one of the central elements in the Group of 20 nations’ drive to make the fund and other international institutions more representative...

Read the rest here.

Reuters
Lagarde says French G20 to discuss wider use of SDR
2010-09-01 18:06 (UTC)

JOUY-EN-JOSAS, France, Sept 1 (Reuters) - France will use its presidency of the G20 next year to discuss proposals for the wider use of IMF special drawing rights (SDRs) as a reserve currency as proposed by China, Economy Minister Christine said...

Read the rest here.

07 July 2010

Currency Wars: Selling The Rope


"The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them." Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

There were a number of Wall Street scions who most infamously associated themselves with Hitler's financiers, and were more than willing to ride the National Socialist tide in Europe for their own benefit come what may, to the extent that they did not stop their activities in supporting the Reich until called out by the government through the Trading with the Enemy Act in 1944.

Why bring that up now? Because that same sort of short term, greedy, amoral thinking is taking the US down a similar path with nations who, while the comparison with Hitler is inappropriate, are certainly no kindred spirits or friends of liberty.

When the truth comes out, the perpetrators will claim ignorance, or victimization, when in fact they have been roundly selling out their country through the blind pursuit of crony capitalism, to the detriment of the people and their country.

The real enemy is not Russia or China, although they are certainly inimical to freedom. The foulest enemy is a domestic predator class, famous for a character that 'would sell their mother for an eighth,' more than willing to sell the future of your grandchildren. They abuse the law, the media, and the integrity of justice to obtain their ends. They are without oath or honor.

And when the time comes, they will prescribe draconian measures and proto-fascism, in an attempt to further consolidate their own personal power, and the benefits provided to themselves and their wealthy friends, under the excuse of the approach of danger from abroad.

"The IRA: This is the idiocy of the U.S. position. We have set ourselves up as an easy target for our enemies. It is astounding that the Chinese have not been more aggressive in selling dollars. Maybe they are going to manage our downfall gently.

Rickards: I think the Chinese probably are doing it gently. The Japanese and Chinese are both influenced by Zen which, in Western jargon, is really about optionality. The whole idea of Zen is to avoid black and white decisions and instead create a range of options and possible outcomes. Instead of committing yourself to a binary decision, you create a fan of probabilities and look for your openings. So in that sense, if you think of it in options space, the Chinese are probably content to play the American paper game with the dollar, but all the while preparing for the day when the dollar collapses completely.

The IRA: Americans are convinced that it cannot happen here, the greatest nation on earth. Reminds us of France after WWI. Same degree of self-delusion. And no reaction by U.S. officials to the Chinese and Russia gold purchases?

Rickards: The Russians do not hide their purchases of gold. The incremental growth of Russian gold reserves is visible in their monthly statistics. The Chinese have been more surreptitious in their purchases but even they have announced the reserves doubled in recent years. The way that both of these nations add to gold without impacting the global price is that they are buying from internal, captive producers. And they pay below market prices because even paying $800 per ounce still gives their miners a tremendous profit. Between 2004 and 2008, China almost doubled the gold stocks of Peoples Bank of China, but they bought it through other state agencies to keep it off their books. (There were some analyst reports out this morning that the Chinese will not buy more gold for their reserves. This is the typical 'opinion' that is used to support bear raids by the banks and hedge funds, nothing more. It was utter nonsense. These fellows 'talk their book' with the same concern that you have to change your underwear. In other words, painting a story that is false but sells their product is a basic tool in their repetoire. - Jesse)

The IRA: So there is the pretense of coordination among the G-20, but meanwhile China is preparing to operate in a hard currency world. Is this a good way to describe your view?

Rickards: We have been operating in a dollar world for decades. Notwithstanding the demise of Bretton Woods in 1971, it's still a dollar system. All of the world's expectations, all of its productive capacity, all of its allocations of capital are built around that system. When the caretakers of that system allow weeds in the garden and for the system to disintegrate and fall apart, which is what I see happening in the U.S., the immediate reaction is first confusion, then panic and then self help. This gets to the heart of the national security implications of the financial crisis. Initially other nations were content to wait for the U.S. response, but now I see nations like China, Russia and Germany increasingly willing to act on their own...

The IRA: So here is the question: if the U.S. has its head buried in the sand, who is the leader of the global currency system going forward?

Rickards: Well, the leader of the process is not clear. This gets back to a whole series of very revealing interviews given by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in the late 1990s that we have to dig out. He embraces something that he calls "convening power," I call it "a bunch of guys." Geithner's world view essentially consists of getting the finance ministers or heads of state in a room, developing an agenda, and then pursuing that process wherever it takes you. I think the US has embraced multilateralism within the G-20 as an alternative to U.S. leadership. I think we look at the G-20 differently than does China, Russia, Brazil and some others. The U.S. looks at the G-20 as a kind of benign, kumbaya, kind of global board of directors that working with the IMF can bring the world in for a soft landing. I don't think the Chinese or the Russians see it that way. They see the G-20 as an interesting tool but from a state-centric view.

The IRA: Geithner's strategy, if you can call it that, reminds us of the shallow management pretense visible in many Wall Street firms. The Chinese and Russians see themselves in the ascendancy and, unlike the U.S., these nations have a vision of where they want to be a century from now. Americans just want to borrow more money."

Chris Whalen, The Institutional Risk Analyst, July 7, 2010

The macro trend is a change in the post Bretton Woods international currency system that is reaching a point of instability, and the decline and fall of the dollar from its postwar imperium. The US and UK will promote the adoption of the SDR, because they exercise a measure of control over the IMF. The BRIC's will accept this because they have little practical alternatives. Therefore the real battle will be the negotiation of the content of the SDR when they rebalance it this year. The Anglo-Americans want no change, but might accept the inclusion of the yuan at a higher exchange rate. The BRIC's want gold and perhaps silver to be included, and a broader basket of currencies from the rising economic powers. It will be quite the geo-political dance.

What is disconcerting to me, and you can see it to some extent in Rickards own work, is that the Wall Street financiers clearly have their eyes on the Pentagon budget: opaque, patriotically defensible, and huge. A currency war, with the Wall Street crowd providing tactics and weaponry and mercenaries to both the US and to its adversaries, might make the bonuses taken from the mortgage bubble look like pocket change by comparison. Its an old idea really, the basis of some legendary fortunes, adapted to the modern world. It produces nothing but misery, while transferring wealth from the many to the few.

“Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed." Mohandas K. Ghandi

03 July 2010

Gold Charts; Currency Wars; Subornation of Perjury, and Financial Coup d'état


If there is a stock crash, all asset classes will suffer liquidation for a period of time, except perhaps for treasuries, and chart formations will get tossed out the window. But at some time after the primary crash, the currency is devalued, and bonds are taken out and beaten.

Crashes are low probability events, but need to be accounted for in your planning. I do that by hedging my positions with some shorts, and relying more on bullion than stocks during riskier periods.

On every pullback, the permabears come out of their caves and do their dance. That is just how it goes in a bull market.



If there is a crash, gold would find significant support around the 1000 mark, as buyers who missed the last leg up will rush in at this chance to buy. However, most of the permabears will NOT buy, since they are now stuck in a cycle of always waiting for THE bottom and bragging rights to a low. If they did not buy in the last plunge, they will never buy.

Things are changing. The world has lost confidence in the dollar reserve currency regime thanks to the serial abuses of Greenspan and Bernanke, and the abusive use of power by the current and previous Administrations. Things that have been in place on a global scale for fifty years change slowly. But that change is happening, and that is what you are seeing in the chart below.

As I noted last year, the SDR recalibration would be a focal point for the BRIC's to attempt to dislodge the dollar hegemony. The US and UK are fighting it with their bag of financial tricks. This is why Obama refused to touch the gangs of NY in his so called reforms. The big banks and hedge funds are as much an instrument of US foreign policy as is its military. Europe is learning this lesson, and it is taking measures to protect itself. This is part of the long range forecast, and is known as the 'currency wars.'



Currency Wars and Coups d'Etat

I will not be surprised at all if in the next ten years certain US and UK officials, and those who claim that they were only acting on their government's behalf, merely following orders, become fugitives from justice. But there may be some 'suicides' and tragic airplane accidents among the weaker links first if things get dodgy. And of course the usual scapegoats, fall guys and patsies.

This is not something involving the United States alone. Iceland is a microcosm of what happened as the systems were overtaken by corruption and greed, and is running ahead of the larger countries because of its smaller scale. The German banks are deep into it. The UK is more likely to follow Iceland's path before the US, and may serve as a bellwether. The neo-con David Cameron is certainly no man of the people, and is likely to make the working classes in Britain howl before he is done with them. England, what were you thinking?

The financial crisis is being used to cover a subversion of justice, what history may some day regard as essentially a financial coup d'etat, wherein a small group of men, many of whom have their roots and connections with a handful of universities, institutions, and investment banks, essentially seized control of the banking system, and by extension the economy, co-opting the media and the political process, and have been bending it increasingly to their will ever since.

What will most likely trip them up is not so much the acts of fraud and insider dealing themselves, but the overreaching, the cover ups, the subornation of perjury to the Congress, and as always, obstruction of justice. But before we reach that point, I would not discount a more overt attempt to seize or direct the power of government through some staged event, some false flag.. But first and foremost they will use the softer means of deception, persuasion, intimidation, and of course the ridicule of anyone who questions their actions by their well paid demi-monde of analysts and commentators.

The oligarchs have almost ruined the US and the UK. They will now seek to subtly starve the middle and lower classes to pay for their piles of wealth which are largely pieces of paper, useless wagers, and will resist every effort to repeal the absolutely irresponsible tax cuts enacted during the administration of their chosen candidate G. W. Bush, and the setup to divert reform through their stalking horse, Barrack Obama.

They will speak out of both sides of their mouths. Unemployment insurance, Social Security benefits, healthcare, relief for the poor, and pensions are bad, and their unfortunate recipients lazy, stupid and an expendable drag on society. But the maintaining of ill gotten gains of the oligarchs, the enormous fortunes obtained through financial fraud, and paying little or no effective taxes on them through various loopholes, is a somehow a sacred requirement for economic recovery. And so we see how reform is floundering, and the smirks of the congressional chimps and pigmen are maintained even as the nations suffer the worst unemployment since the Great Depression.

There will be many 'useful idiots,' well outside the real circle of power but who consider themselves the well-to-do, that will agree with this injustice, and vehemently attack the unfortunate in society because of a combination of character flaws, usually selfishness, emotional immaturity, and just plain meanness. It is how it always is. Most Gestapo informants were actually neighbors, co-workers, bearing petty grudges and spites, not realizing the damage they were doing to real people. The coldness of the unenlightened human heart and the obtuse vanity of people in wishing suffering on others, with a kind of perverse self-righteousness, is sometimes a wonder to be hold.

As for the politicians and financiers, the oligarchs and those that surround them, I have tried to figure them out for a long time, often first hand. Some are just sociopaths, obsessively driven, as lacking in human feeling as the fellow who would shoot you in the face for your wallet. These white collar jokers have merely had better educational opportunities.

But as for the others, the many, I think that are just ordinary hard working people that over become so intellectually inbred that their viewpoint becomes like a clique, or a cult. They tend to be in positions where they can make or enforce the rules to suit themselves, and spend most of their time talking with others like them, with similar attitudes and feelings towards the world extensively influenced by their profession. They develop a feeling of isolation from the great bulk of humanity.

Principles such as morality, right and wrong, cease to be relevant, without the common cultural context, for them. They become so preoccupied in the particularities of their own piece of game. They lose sight of the big picture. And sometimes this can lead to terrible abuses and excesses.

As an aside, I thought the recent essay from the fellow at the Fed who did not believe that anyone who does not have a PhD were imbeciles incapable of discussing or understanding economics was a good example. Did he understand how silly he sounded, writing from the very heart of a disgraced profession, and from an organization that under Greenspan and then Bernanke look like incompetent clowns lacking even common sense? I was actually embarrassed for him. Coming from the world of technology and big corporations I know the type.

A corporate culture can degenerate into a dangerously compelling institutional blindness, especially in organizations that like to bring their people in young and 'mold them.' Whenever I see clusters of resumes with the words 'Goldman' and 'Yale' or 'Harvard' in them cringe. The CIA used to favor Yale for recruiting, since it seemed to impart an outlook in its students that was amenable to spycraft. I do not know if that is still the case, whether universities tend to develop outlooks by their choice and development of students, but major corporations certainly do.

The US cannot obtain a sustained recovery without serious and significant financial reform and restructuring of its economy, and the legal repatriation of the wealth stolen by the financiers through fraud. What complicates this is that the politicians have allowed themselves to be tainted by the same brush of corruption, so in the short term everything is illusion, deception, and cover up. Slowly but surely, the truth will out. But the delay causes damage.

The bad debts will be liquidated. They cannot be repaid. Starving the common people alone will not work, and selling the sovereign assets will not be enough. Taxes would have to be raised to post WW II levels, along the lines of 70+% for the wealthy. How likely is this? The wealthy elite will promote the confiscation of pensions and Social Security first. These will be dangerous times, full of deception. Greed and fear will reach high emotional states.

Therefore default, albeit selective, is the rationale alternative, excepting the contrivance of yet another war to stimulate demand and encourage compliant behaviour. And that default will be accomplished through devaluation of the currency, the basis of all the debt, which is the Fed's note of zero duration. It will spread the pain throughout all holders of US debt, including those that do not vote. Bernanke and his economists know this.

They will not admit it, because they are playing a confidence endgame with the people and with the holders of US sovereign debt, many of whom are foreign. The last thing they wish to cause is a panic. But at some point, there will be one, and it will not be pretty. The Democrats will attempt to kick that can down the road, delivering it to the successor to Obama, who is like to be a one term wonder 'unless something happens.'

"At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it?-- Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never!--All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.

At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide...

I do not mean to say, that the scenes of the [American] revolution are now or ever will be entirely forgotten; but that like every thing else, they must fade upon the memory of the world, and grow more and more dim by the lapse of time. In history, we hope, they will be read of, and recounted, so long as the bible shall be read;-- but even granting that they will, their influence cannot be what it heretofore has been. Even then, they cannot be so universally known, nor so vividly felt, as they were by the generation just gone to rest.

At the close of that struggle, nearly every adult male had been a participator in some of its scenes. The consequence was, that of those scenes, in the form of a husband, a father, a son or brother, a living history was to be found in every family-- a history bearing the indubitable testimonies of its own authenticity, in the limbs mangled, in the scars of wounds received, in the midst of the very scenes related--a history, too, that could be read and understood alike by all, the wise and the ignorant, the learned and the unlearned.--

But those histories are gone. They can be read no more forever. They were a fortress of strength; but, what invading foeman could never do, the silent artillery of time has done; the leveling of its walls. They are gone.--They were a forest of giant oaks; but the all-resistless hurricane has swept over them, and left only, here and there, a lonely trunk, despoiled of its verdure, shorn of its foliage; unshading and unshaded, to murmur in a few gentle breezes, and to combat with its mutilated limbs, a few more ruder storms, then to sink, and be no more.

They were the pillars of the temple of liberty; and now, that they have crumbled away, that temple must fall, unless we, their descendants, supply their places with other pillars, hewn from the solid quarry of sober reason. Passion has helped us; but can do so no more. It will in future be our enemy. Reason, cold, calculating, unimpassioned reason, must furnish all the materials for our future support and defence.

Let those materials be moulded into general intelligence, sound morality, and in particular, a reverence for the constitution and laws: and, that we improved to the last; that we remained free to the last; that we revered his name [George Washington] to the last; that, during his long sleep, we permitted no hostile foot to pass over or desecrate his resting place; shall be that which to learn the last trumpet shall awaken our Washington.

Upon these let the proud fabric of freedom rest, as the rock of its basis; and as truly as has been said of the only greater institution, the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."

Abraham Lincoln, Lyceum Address, 27 January 1838

What a difference there was in attitude, in the American of Lincoln's day, to the memory of the great patriots and Founding Fathers, which still was so fresh in their minds. Yes, there are always outliers and lawbreakers. But then there was a sense of outrage and disgrace at the exceptions, not a cynical acceptance of dishonor and deception as a rule.

But above all, their humility and devotion under God, to the oaths which they had solemnly taken, to preserve, defend, and to uphold the Constitution, trampled on almost daily now, from outrage to outrage, by a corrupt and greedy Congress and Executive and Judges, cynical politicians and their whoremasters the bankers, who consider themselves as gods, and the Constitution as 'just a goddamn piece of paper.'

As Andrew Jackson said of the Federal Reserve Bank of his day:

"Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out."
Jackson had government officials secretly investigating the bankers, to obtain the evidence of their schemes and frauds. But the cowardly President, and craven and corrupt Congress, do not appear to even have the courage and the will to audit it, to force it to answer questions truthfully and with the appropriate oversight, and make itself accountable, even in the face of conflicts of interest and the appropriation of billions in funds under false pretenses, which they gave to their cronies on Wall Street. Such are the times.

Knowledge grows by sharing. When you find it, repost and and forward it wherever you can. Little by little, the truth will find a way, but it takes our efforts to set it free. I think that I am running about 12 to 24 months ahead of the curve, so the ideas expressed here will not obtain much credit now. But watch as things unfold. There is more to tell, but revelations have to be made in their due course.

And if by chance, for whatever reason, this blog should ever go dark before happier times can come, then remember me in your thoughts and prayers, as I will remember you.

13 May 2010

Jim Rickards on the May 12 IMF Meeting:SDR as World Reserve Currency


Rickards has a target of $2,000 for gold in the near term, and $5,000 for the intermediate term.

ECB has capitulated on the monetization of debt and joined the Fed, but it is hard to see how this will really solve the problem.

Europeans are running to buy physical bullion, rather than paper pledges in a kind of a 'run on the bank' over fears of the future of the Euro.

The subject of the meeting in Zurich yesterday was for the G20 to discuss the composition and role of SDR's as a reserve currency.

Triffin's dilemma: need for a 'liquidity pump' to drive world trade, someone who is able to sustain deficits without going broke. Now that the US is going broke, a new source of liquidity has to be found.

Rickard views SDR's as pure fiat on a pro rata basis. He does not see any accountability on the part of the IMF or any sort of external control.


While I see some of his points, I think Jim is confused about the notion that the SDR is a 'basket of currencies,' that already exist, unless they are changing the basis of the SDR to debt of their own issuance. I was not at all clear on this, and I would be a little surprised if that is the case.

What the IMF has been proposing with the support of the BRIC countries, is to put the SDR forward as a 'clearing mechanism' for international trade. They are also actively lobbying for a recomposition of the SDR to shift some of the monetary authority from the west to the east.

If the SDR is a 'basket of currencies,' each with their own debt balance sheet, and the SDR is not intended to replace or supplant domestic currencies, and especially if the SDR contains some element of gold and silver, then I view it as a natural development from the Bretton Woods system, and the failure of the US Federal Reserve to responsibly manage its currency 'like it was a gold standard.'

The IMF is attempting to replace the US dollar as the world's reserve currency with a portfolio of major fiat currencies, with the notion that the result will be more stable, more diversely based. Again, an element of gold and silver would further strengthen it.

I could be mistaken in what the IMF intends. But I have seen nothing to indicate that yet, and I think for now that Jim Rickards is mistaken in the assumptions underlying some of his statements.

IF the IMF decides to create a fiat currency of its own, and call it the SDR, and base it solely on its own balance sheet, with an arbitrary ability to expand and distribute it, then it really is the beginning of a new world order, and a one world government. But for now I do not see that to be the case. I can find no statement on the IMF homepage to this effect.

Why not go directly to a gold and silver standard? The greatest obstacle is that the Anglo American nations, or more properly their central banks and politicians, would not accept it. It would be inimical to their monetary power and financial engineering. The US Federal Reserve will not even agree to be audited by its own government! And do you think they would agree to the constraint of an external gold standard? This is a highly political as well as economic topic, and to ignore that is to completely misunderstand what is happening.

An evolutionary path to something less arbitrary than the dollar, but not quite as strict as gold, is most likely. This is being driven by China and Russia and the developing countries, and on the other side of the table are the Anglo-American banks, and to a less extent, Europe, after having been whipped into place by assaults on its monetary union.

It is an interesting interview. I only caution that more details need to be given from the IMF on what they are doing before conclusion can be drawn. I have been expecting this for a long time, and it is a development that the BRIC countries have been lobbying to obtain. The Anglo-Americans exert considerable influence over the IMF. This is a classic struggle for power between the old world powers and the developing world.

This is not to say that I am comfortable with the IMF. I have attempted to lay out the parameters to assess what they are doing with respect to a basket and clearing house versus a completely new global currency. Since the US and UK hold inordinate sway over the IMF, we have to be aware of the possibility that the IMF could merely become a much larger successor to the Federal Reserve, and owned and controlled by the Anglo-American banking interests. This is why gold and silver are the ultimate solution, and why the status quo will oppose them with all their power.

His follow on discussion of how hedge funds and financial institutions can attack a nation's currency using derivatives is very worth hearing.

Click here to listen to the Rickards Interview on King World News.

05 May 2010

Jim Rickards: Gold, Silver, and a May 11 Meeting to Discuss Global Currency Issues


Gold is showing a potential inverse H&S pattern.



Silver is in a well-defined uptrend.



As are the miners.

But all bets are off for the miners and silver most likely if US equities head south.



Jim Rickards on CNBC discusses the May 11th IMF meeting in Switzerland
to discuss the dollar alternatives, the SDR and gold.

And it is worth watching the reactions of the CNBC anchors to what their guests
have to say, and the elegantly polite way that Rickards deals with Joe Kernen.





It's kind of sad that after all these years Joe Kernen is Becky Quick's assistant.

Doesn't he have seniority or something? Can't Immelt throw him a bone?

Currency Wars


"In his latest letter, Mylchreest reckons we are now in the ‘Third Gold War' since the Second World War and this is being waged between the USA in conjunction with other western countries/institutions, notably the IMF, and various opposing sectors worldwide. In his contention, the U.S. and its allies lost the first of these ‘gold wars' to the French (then under De Gaulle) and the second to the Middle East, helped significantly by the then pro-gold stance and purchasing power of the German Deutsche Bank .

This latest Gold War has been/is being fought covertly. "High profile sales of physical gold have, for the most part, been replaced by sales of "paper gold" in the form of futures, OTC options and unallocated gold, etc." asserts Mylchreest. But this time he reckons the veil has been lifted and the whole charade is beginning to unravel. Instead of France or Arab nations, the opponent this time is China - the 800 pound gorilla - potentially an even more formidable opponent, with a huge treasury of trillions of dollars with which to back its moves. It's not just that it is the Chinese government which is the major participant, but also now that gold and silver ownership is being promoted to the populace there by government institutions, there is the huge pent-up, and growing interest in precious metals of the rapidly increasing Chinese middle class and its potential to affect the global demand patterns."

China: the Gorilla in the Third Gold War, Lawrence Williams


The gold war as described above is just one front in a greater and more general 'currency war' that is evolving as the empire of 'the US dollar as the reserve currency,' which has been in place since the end of WW II, declines and finally falls in the profligacy and crony capitalism of the Federal Reserve Bank and the Treasury.

This battle may manifest itself more publicly later this year in the debate over the reconstitution of the basket of currencies that the IMF's Special Drawing Rights (SDR) will contain.

What Will Be the New World Reserve Currency

Russia Calls for Changes to the SDR

The SDR may not be the successor to the dollar hegemony in the short term. The BRICs may lobby hard enough to legitimize it, and even to include some gold and silver content in addition to the fiat currencies of a greater number of countries. I do not believe that they can be successful without some support from the Petrodollar countries in the Mideast.

I realize that the SDR is just another fiat currency, a somewhat artificial construct for the accounting of international trade, a fiat of fiats if you will. It may even be inherently unstable in the midst of the controlled demolition of most fiat currencies that is now underway.

But from a portfolio perspective it could be useful to take some of the power to control the world's money supply away from the Anglo-American banking cartel and its politicians who have proven themselves to be unworthy of such a great responsibility.

I don't think a direct transition to specie is feasible. Inclusion of gold and silver in the SDR provides an evolutionary path.

One cannot help but wonder if the current bear raids on the EU and the euro by the financial predators and economic hitmen, the gangs of New York, is designed to bring them to heel in the SDR debate tne this phase of the currency war, and to diminish the potential role of the euro in the newly created basket of world currencies.

If the new currency unit the SDR is used only for international settlements and reserves it may be successful. However, if it is promoted as a general currency for domestic usage, then one only has to look at the current troubles in Europe to understand what a trap this is.

Unity of currency without unity of government and fiscal policy and taxation is difficult if not impossible to maintain. One world currency is the step to one world government. And those who control the currency will, almost inevitably, control the people of the world.

"Basically, what Economic Hit Men are trained to do is to build up the American empire. To create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we've been very successful...We knew Saudi Arabia was the key to dropping our dependency, or to controlling the situation. And we worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petro-dollars back to the United States and invest them in U.S. government securities...The House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they've done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we've done, which is one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq in the first place...So we make this big loan, most of it comes back to the United States, the country is left with the debt plus lots of interest, and they basically become our servants, our slaves. It's an empire. There's no two ways about it. It's a huge empire. It's been extremely successful...This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people..."

John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hitman



“Currency warfare is the most destructive form of economic warfare."

Harry Dexter White, US Representative to Bretton Woods, 1944


"History teaches us that the capacity of things to get worse is limitless. Roman history suggests that the short, happy life of the American republic may be coming to its end... [the US will probably] maintain a facade of constitutional government and drift along until financial bankruptcy overtakes it. Of course, bankruptcy will not mean the literal end of the United States any more than it did for Germany in 1923, China in 1948, or Argentina in 2002-03. It might, in fact, open the way for an unexpected restoration of the American system, or for military rule or simply for some development we cannot yet imagine. Certainly, such a bankruptcy would mean a drastic lowering of our standard of living, a loss of control over international affairs, a process of adjusting to the rise of other powers, including China and India..."

Chalmers Johnson


04 March 2010

Russia Continues to Build Its Gold Reserves Ahead of the SDR Discussions


Thanks to Dave at Golden Truth for this updated chart.



As you know, Russia, India, China and some of the BRIC-like countries will continue to push hard for a gold and silver content in the new formulation of the SDR this year. The US and UK are vehemently opposed.

Europe is still wallowing in confusion and is virtually leaderless, as the most recent financial crisis in Greece shows. This may not be all bad, because it highlights the weaknesses in their union, and gives them the incentive to take it to the next step.

One cannot have a common currency with uncommon fiscal policies and laws. While there is some room for discretion, it is sorely tried in changing economic conditions and social attitudes. America went through a bloody Civil War for this reason.

This is why a one world currency, except for international trade only and at the discretion of trading partners, is so dangerous. One cannot maintain their sovereign freedom when someone else controls the supply of their money: either you cheat or you submit. All serious economists understand this; too few of the voting public do.

What Will the World Currency Become? The Stakes Are Enormous

And the Winner Is...the SDR?

This is the fallacy of the US dollar as the reserve currency for the world. It 'worked' as even Mr. Greenspan noted, as long as the US dollar was able to demonstrate the objective stability of an external gold standard relative to other currencies. That lasted for a few years, and the rest is foreign policy and currency wars. The time for its replacement is long past. The BRIC's understand this, and are playing their hands accordingly.

If one submits to a single world or regional currency for domestic use, they may as well take their constitutions and individual rights and throw them away. And globalization has been serving as a proxy for this, paving the way.

Gold and Economic Freedom: Did Greenspan Know What He Was Doing? - ZeroHedge

The moves here are slow and subtle, since great nations are involved. I get the impression, though, that most traders are playing checkers at a chess match. Well, that works for the daytrade. But only time will tell what will happen, and when. But sometimes events can break free and move quickly. Best to gather those nickles off the freeway before the rush hour commences.

Or as the man behind the .50 cal would say, 'Git some. Come git some.'

27 December 2009

What Will the World Reserve Currency System Become? The Stakes Are Enormous


The deterioration of the dollar reserve currency regime is obvious.

If we have forecasted correctly, the world will look to some variation of the IMF's Special Drawing Rights as an eventual replacement for the US dollar. Therefore, the recomposition of the SDR next year will become a lightning rod for the global stresses created by an increasingly unstable and impractical system of global trade.

As you may recall, Russia and China have called for the inclusion of more currencies such as the rouble, the yuan, the Aussie and Canadian dollars, and gold and possibly silver into the mix. The BRIC's seem determined to break the western dominance of global monetary policy.

This may also explain some of the highly emotional,and we would say nonsensical, arguments attacking gold and silver by some of the house economists for the western Banks, and their camp followers and hand puppets in the universities, of late.

The bankers are appalled at the prospect of the new SDR including gold or silver in its new composition to be set in 2010. And so they are jawboning ahead of it. Any country can build its gold and silver reserves in the open market, and the big central bankers find it difficult to manipulate their supplies to their own advantage, despite years of desperate efforts to substitute paper for metal.

Bad enough that the basket may include currencies of non-G7 countries. As you will recall, the G7 was formed when Canada joined the Group of Six: US, Great Britain, France, Germany, Japan, and Italy. The power balances of the post World War II era are changing, and the shifts in trade and financial power reflect this.

In the interim, there will be regional currency arrangements and trading blocs as in the past. The strength and suitability of the new SDR regime will help to determine the disposition of these regional arrangements.

'Free trade' without a floating monetary exchange system is not possible. Otherwise there will be artificial subsidies and penalties among nations, as in all systems of price control. These lead inevitably to imbalances, bubbles, and crises.

The adjustments that are overdue for the dollar and renminbi in particular will make political progress difficult. But the greatest impediment to progress will be the Anglo-American banking cartel, which seeks to control the issue of money as a means of implementing policy and distributing wealth, especially with regard to the natural resources and labor of the developing nations.

Emirates Business Dubai
Do We Need a New Reserve Currency?

By Martin Wolf
Sunday, December 27, 2009

A new global currency should replace the US dollar as the international reserve currency, as the long-term deterioration of America's economy and the greenback is fuelling a "currency-regime crisis," says Martin Wolf, associate editor and chief economics commentator of the Financial Times.

Wolf, who has honorary doctorates from three universities, bases his argument in part on the Triffin dilemma, an economic paradox named after economist Robert Triffin. The paradox shows that the US dollar's role as a global reserve currency leads to a conflict between US national monetary policy and global monetary policy. It also points to fundamental imbalances in the balance of payments, particularly in the US current account.

Speaking at an event organised by the Singapore Institute of International Affairs, Wolf said Triffin believed that the host nation of a global reserve currency will inevitably run up a huge current account deficit that would consequently undermine the credibility of its currency and adversely impact the global economy. "You can't have an open globalised economy that relies for its ultimate liquidity on the currency of one country. That was his [Triffin's] argument. And, therefore, he said the Bretton Woods system would break, which it did. And exactly the same thing happened with Bretton Woods II, which is the system of pegging.

"So I agree with this. And I'm absolutely convinced now, in a way that I was not three or four years ago, that we cannot continue with a genuinely global economy which relies on national money, and that's not sold by just adding another couple (of currencies). It actually means having a global money."

Indeed, Wolf said he's in complete agreement with China Central Bank Governor Zhou Xiaochuan, who has argued for a new global currency "most credibly and convincingly."

"On the dollar, there is nothing to support this currency except the Chinese government and a few other governments that are prepared to buy it," said Wolf. "Anybody can look at the arithmetic of the fiscal deficit, the monetary policy, the external balance, which has improved but largely because of the recession -- the dollar is not adequately supported."

The US currently has a national debt in excess of $12 trillion or almost $40,000 per citizen, with a debt to GDP ratio of more than 85 per cent. In the July-September quarter, the US current account deficit rose sharply by 10.3 per cent from the previous quarter to $108 billion. In the past year, the US dollar index, which measures the performance of the greenback against a basket of currencies, has also fallen significantly.

Apart from the economic risks posed by the decline of the US dollar, China's devaluation of its currency is causing "a real problem" for Europe. The "very perverse currency adjustment" is highly destabilising for the euro zone economy and could create a crisis, said Wolf.

"There is nothing to prevent this, unless the Europeans decide they are going to intervene in the foreign currency market to buy dollars, and that would be over (European Central Bank president) Jean-Claude Trichet's dead body."

As there is "no chance" of European governments intervening in the foreign exchange markets to improve the competitiveness of the euro, it will result in major currencies such as the euro and Japan's yen becoming "very vulnerable."

"This is simply the American way of shifting the recession from them to their trading partners," said Wolf.

"What we need are global currency adjustments and it has to include the renminbi and global macro adjustments in those countries which make this less painful."

"In terms of the impact of this on the role of the US dollar as the currency of denomination for international transactions, basically I think it's become very unreasonable."

"Because the dollar, to my mind, given its underlying conditions, is no longer a credible long-term store of value," said Wolf. The decline of the US dollar underscores a phase of global power transition, with the balance of power moving from the US to Europe, China, and India, Wolf argues, adding that the greenback's loss of credibility as the dominant global reserve currency is part of this messy transition.

The Americans no longer have the means to save themselves, this is what I think people don't understand. There is no credible American policy," said Wolf. (The American policy has been to maintain the status quo and to confiscate wealth by exporting fraud in amounts that are beyond all reason. This is hardly acceptable to the rest of the world. It is remarkable how few US economists understand this for what it is. Are they so abysmally ignorant by choice or by training? Sometimes it is hard to tell. What can one expect from a group that could not acknowledge the enormous bubbles that have rocked their economy in the past ten years until the damage was done. They are as reprehensible as the doctors who helped to promulgate the psychiatric abuses in the gulag of the former Soviet Union. - Jesse)

"We need to discuss this globally in a harmonious way. It's not happening, so at the moment the euro zone is a prime victim and it will continue to be, and that will create very big problems for European-based manufacturers, and quite particularly those that are relatively vulnerable to global price effects.

"And it's a tremendous mess, a horrifying mess, and that's where we are. I'm sorry. And we've got to get through this transition as quickly as possible to a more stable global monetary system with a lesser reliance on the dollar. We're going to get there over the next 10 years; I'm sure of it. We're going to get there. The only question we have to decide is how we're going to get there."

Meanwhile, a trade skirmish between the US and China could ensue, if Beijing continues to devalue its currency to bolster export-driven economic growth at the expense of economic recovery in the US, said Wolf. (Not just the US, the rest of the world as well - Jesse)

He says China is working hard to defend the artificially low value of the renminbi in the hope that exports will pick up when external demand recovers. According to China's customs authorities, exports from January to November plunged by 18.8 per cent to $1.07 trillion from a year ago. However, according to the Royal Bank of Canada, export growth should pick up in the coming months and reach double-digits in early 2010.

China's efforts, Wolf said, will spark a "very vigorous, even vicious" reaction from the US as it's destabilising US efforts to engender an economic recovery.


06 October 2009

SDRs and the Endgame for the US Dollar Reserve


Our take on this is that there is NO question that the US dollar will lose its reserve currency status, and the Treasury and the Fed are aware of this.

The game being played now on the international stage, largely behind the scenes until recently, is with regard to what will take its place and how it will be implemented.

The talking heads on US financial television are largely talking their books even today, taking the position that nothing can replace the US dollar for the next fifteen years at least (Robert Altman-Bloomberg).

Most of the anchors and house commentators are just shallow, nervous in a giggly sort of way, and astoundingly naive which may be attributed to their relative youth and lack of relevant experience in anything beyond looking good and being often wrong but never in doubt.

The US and UK are pushing for Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) from the IMF as the replacement, with very minor rebalancing. There are those who prefer something that they feel is less neo-colonial, or at least more neutral, and reflective of a changing economic reality.

Much of what is hitting the news now is political jawboning ahead of the next realignment of the SDRs in 2010 after the recent summit in Istanbul to discuss this very topic that the news people in the US are denying ever even occurred.

"The basket composition is reviewed every five years by the Executive Board to ensure that it reflects the relative importance of currencies in the world’s trading and financial systems.

In the most recent review (in November 2005), the weights of the currencies in the SDR basket were revised based on the value of the exports of goods and services and the amount of reserves denominated in the respective currencies which were held by other members of the IMF.

These changes became effective on January 1, 2006. The next review will take place in late 2010"
The current composition of the SDR, as calculated in 2005, is:
"The value of the SDR was initially defined as equivalent to 0.888671 grams of fine gold—which, at the time, was also equivalent to one U.S. dollar. After the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1973, however, the SDR was redefined as a basket of currencies, today consisting of the euro, Japanese yen, pound sterling, and U.S. dollar."

"With effect from January 1, 2006, the IMF has determined that the four currencies that meet both selection criteria for inclusion in the SDR valuation basket will be assigned the following weights based on their roles in international trade and finance: U.S. dollar (44 percent), euro (34 percent), Japanese yen (11 percent), and pound sterling (11 percent)".

Here is a commentary from Max Keiser, an ex-patriate based in Paris. His analysis will seem harsh at times to American ears, more conditioned to the evening news. But this represents what a significant portion of the world now thinks, and it is worthwhile to at least listen to it.

Why would the US resist this? Because there is a huge overhang of dollars in the world, far beyond what can be sustained at current valuation if the dollar was NOT the reserve currency., artificially incenting countries to hold dollars, and to use them for some essential purchases such as oil.

The strong dollar is a huge benefit to the US financial sector and the government. It is a significant drawback to US industry and the non-military productive economy. This is why the Europeans are opposed to the Euro becoming the world's sole reserve currency. Their financial sector has not obtained a dominant influence over the government, and their predisposition to military adventurism is still tempered by their experiences with war in the 20th century. That could change, but not yet.

People talk about an artificial short in the dollar because of debt. That concept only works if the Fed does not exercise its printing press, which it said it would do, and is now doing. But the dollar overhang exists, and has become precariously unstable, and unsustainable.

Max Keiser is hearing that the target composition will be weighted to 50 percent gold, in a return to a system more in keeping with the original Bretton Woods agreement. This is most likely the position being taken by France, China and Russia. The US and UK are adamantly opposed and will fight a delaying game with 2020 as a target for a phased in approach that continues to favor the dollar.

He starts going 'off the rails' for my taste about four minutes into this interview, but it is a viewpoint that is becoming more widely held in parts of the world that are starting to matter to the US economy, blowback-wise, and Americans need to be more aware of this perhaps for practical considerations.




See Also: The Decline of the Dollar as the World's Reserve Currency


01 July 2009

China Requests Debate on Reserve Currency at G14 Summit


China is proposing a new reserve currency regime less dependent on the dollar, along with other BRIC countries, and the US and its financial allies in the status quo will resist change because it is in their short term interest to do so.

China can take 'pre-emptive' action by diversifying its holdings ahead of any change, and there are some indications that it is doing so already. But while the dollar is the prime medium of international trade, China must buy dollars to support its mercantilist industrial policy. Its own alternative is to boost its domestic consumption and 'grow a middle class' which in some minds erodes the power of the narrow political elite which rules the country.

The US needs to stand firm in some areas, and acquiesce in others. Standing firm with regard to the yuan being free of a peg and currency controls is one area that ought to have been sine qua non when first Clinton and then Bush gave China its openings as a preferred trading partner even while maintaining de facto industrial subsidies through its currency and markets.

The first line of negotiation will be to agree on a dollar substitute, which will probably be the SDR. The US will resist and delay this as long as is possible.

The fallback position then will be the composition of the SDR, and a long phasing of the change in the primacy of the dollar and a few G7 currencies. China will seek more diversity and the inclusion of gold and silver, which is anathema to the Wall Street banking cartel.

The US must change or face more seismic, involuntary dislocations. As Britain surrendered its far flung colonial Empire, so the US must downsize its financial sector, restore balance to its own economy and its place in the world economy, and relinquish the primary reserve currency status which has become a powerful instrument of manipulation by the Wall Street banking cartel.

The dollar is the last, the mother of bubbles. Few understand this even now.

The epic US credit expansion was enabled by the preferred position of US debt instruments as the reserve currency of the world. The bond and the dollar are the absolute foundation of that debt pyramid.

Those days are undeniably over. What comes next and in what order and timing remains open to question for sure, but that substantial change is occurring is not.

The difficulty is that the financial institutions are a powerful influence over many key politicians in Washington and London and thought leaders and media outlets around the country, and in some parts of the world.

The military-industrial complex of which Eisenhower warned has become a real impediment to freedom in the US, but ironically it is not the manufacturing sector but the service, or FIRE sector, which has its grip on US political decision-making.

Obama could have changed this and there was hope that he would, but all that he has does so far appears to demonstrate that he and his advisors are fully compromised by the potent financial interests controlling their country.

What comes next, no one can say. But change is in the wind, and with that change comes the rise and fall of powerful but all too human institutions which many still believe can last for a thousand years, even as they are on the brink of der untergang, their downfall.

Reuters
China requests reserve currency debate at G8
Wed Jul 1, 2009 11:58am EDT

July 1 (Reuters) - China has asked to debate proposals for a new global reserve currency at next week's Group of Eight summit in Italy and the issue could be referred to briefly in the summit statement, G8 sources said on Wednesday.

One G8 source who was involved in the negotiations said China made the request during preparatory talks about a joint statement to be issued on the second day of the summit in L'Aquila by the G8 plus the G5 (Brazil, India, China, Mexico and South Africa) and also Egypt.

This forum, the so-called "G14", meets on July 9 to discuss the financial crisis, trade and climate change and for the first time a G8 summit will also produce a joint G14 statement.

A European source with knowledge of preparations for the summit also said China had raised the subject of a reserve currency debate and that it might be mentioned during the meeting, though the source added: "Any country at the meeting can raise issues they see fit." (China is not just 'any country' these days - Jesse)

"But whether there is a specific mention in the communique remains open," said the European source, adding that sherpas would discuss this further in preparatory talks on Friday.

The debate centres on proposals by some emerging powers that an alternative should be found to the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency, to reflect the shifting balance of power in the globalised economy.

China's central bank governor said in March the world should consider using the International Monetary Fund's Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as a super-sovereign currency. The SDR is an international reserve asset allocated to IMF members and its exchange rate is determined by a basket of dollars, euros, sterling and yen. (China also wishes to modify its composition - Jesse)

But the Chinese proposal failed to gain ground after several world leaders, and officials from the IMF, backed the dollar as the global reserve currency. (Reporting by Reuters bureaux)