The Partnership Between Wall Street and the Government Will Continue Until the System Collapses?

“Hindsight is a wonderful thing,” said Timothy W. Long, the chief bank
examiner for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. “At the height of
the economic boom, to take an aggressive supervisory approach and tell people to
stop lending is hard to do.” Post Mortems Reveal Obvious Risks at Banks, NY Times

Well, the boom is over, so what about now?

The current notional value of derivatives on US commercial banks’ balance sheets is $203 trillion. 97% of these ($196 trillion) sit on FIVE banks’ balance sheets, according to a recent report from that very same Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

It is obvious from this report that Goldman Sachs is by no means a bank, and deserves no consideration as such. It is a hedge fund. In general, Wall Street is out of control.



Today's testimony by Timmy Geithner in front of the US Congress is interesting to watch. It serves to reinforce my opinion that the Administration is incompetent, caught in old solutions and the status quo, and that the Republican alternative is morally and intellectually bankrupt, given to demagoguery, and owned by a similar but slightly different set of special interests.

Most of the congress are indifferent to the interests of the American people as a whole, whether through self interest or mere cravenness, despite their occasional histrionics for the cameras. It is remarkable how they can act as outraged bystanders, when they have long been at the heart of the corruption and decline. It is their job to manage the government. They have classic American CEO amnesia and 'incredible denial.'

The key to a general reform has been and still is campaign finance reform and a reduction of lobbying payments and campaign contributions as soft bribes to Congress. As the banks cannot regulate and reform themselves, at least according to John Mack's recent advice to the American people, so the Congress and the federal government seem incapable of reforming and managing themselves. If one does it, takes liberties with the law, then they all want to do it to a greater or lesser degree; and in some ways they must if they are to be competitive, if the administration of justice creates the opportunity for selective exceptions, the weakening of regulation.

And too many in the States are yearning for a strong leader, someone who will tell them what to do. A great man, who will exercise authority with a directness and little or no discussion. Someone who will 'put things right.' The primary question seems to be less policy than fashion, whether to wear brown shirts or black, and whether torchlight is too 'retro.'

On a brighter note, the Noveau beaujolais for 2009 is rather nice, dry almost to a fault, but not too tannic. A little more 'fruitiness' would have been a highlight.

SP 500 Daily Chart: Pete and Repeat Were on a Boat...

Just another day doing God's work on earth...

"Hello Lloyd? Yeah, Larry and I were talking, and we would like to see the market go up, not too fast, but on a nice gentle slope, within a range.
Whatever gains you make doing this are yours to keep. Ben will supply the liquidity. We need to make it look like the Administration's policies are working.
And most Americans will think they are if the stock market is up."

Alternative View: Housing Prices Have Fallen Significantly Towards the Trend

Here is the graph associated with a view of the deflating housing bubble that shows we have appreciably fallen, further than the 25% in the blog entry from yesterday.



For the details on this view read here.

It appears that both sets of numbers, the ones above and the ones from yesterday, have been adjusted somewhat.

The numbers from yesterday are Indexed to 1980 = 100, and are therefore a percentage of increase.

The numbers above are nominal prices, and then adjusted for inflation using some governmental measure presumably.

One appears to be based on median prices, and the other on total transactions.

I have not yet reconciled the two views, as I am rather tired and 'under the weather,' compliments of the children's propensity to bring home their sniffles and sneezes at this time of year, the head colds that seem to linger endlessly, despite the repeated application of vitamins, chicken soup, sudafed, ibuprofen, and the occasional sip of Beaujolais Noveau. But for today at least I am, like Mr. Buffett is to the economic recovery, 'all in.'

And yes, I did finally break down and listen to the spouse, obtaining a swine flu vaccination. Perhaps it will help me think like a Fed banker and figure out their gameplan. lol.

Have Home Prices Only Fallen 1/4 of the Way to Trend?

Interesting chart to say the least.

Ben is pumping the money buttons so hard that the trend may be realized a bit higher in nominal terms once inflation kicks in.

But it may not yet be the best time to buy that new home, unless it is done for a primary residence, and with great care.

As forecast here several times earlier this year, commercial real estate will be a train wreck in 2010. That should help housing find another leg down.

New Observations.net
Values Have Fallen Only 25% of the Fall Needed to Reach Trend
By Michael White
November 11, 2009

PRICE TRENDS / WAR OF THE WORLDS (Part 4): Property owners nationwide have lost only one dollar for every four dollars they can ultimately expect to lose on their home...



Read the rest here.

NAVs of Certain Precious Metal Funds and ETFs

Buiter Still Obsessing Fitfully on Gold: What Time is the Next Currency Crisis?

Mr. Buiter, advisor to central banks and to Goldman Sachs, is at it again, comparing gold to Yap Island stone money, ranting against those who would trade valuable bank paper for something that he does not like, (but has endured as a store of wealth nonetheless for thousands of years).

Once is a phenomenon, but twice is a trend. What can be dismissed as a crank rant must now be seen as a symptom of a man talking his book, and none too gracefully.

We give more credence now to the rumours that the Bank of England has miscalculated badly and the LBMA et al. are 'on the hook' for more gold than they can provide, precipitating a crisis for their advisors, especially those on the wrong side of the trading advice. And further, that gold held offshore by some prominent members of the European Union are having difficulty getting their collateral back from some of the bullion banks in a deliverable condition.

Quite a few options are coming due on the US Comex next week, and the bankers may be once more 'staring into an abyss.' Or setting up for a big push lower to 'save the banks.' That would be traditional central banking stewardship of late days.

"We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken down all the rest in their wake..." Eddie George, Governor Bank of England, in a conversation with CEO of Lonmin, September 1999

"W. Buiter, CBE, Member Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England (1997-2000)" Shoulder to shoulder with Sir Eddie on the brink, eh? That must have been rather intense. Oh, bravo.

People can remain rational and place their trust in the timeless longer than central bankers and politicos can feed them arbitrary illusions and promissories for wealth on the bankers' terms. At least while they retain free market choice.

Welcome to the unintended downside of quantitatively easing your way to wealth, ie. a loss of credibility.

Welcome to the world of bubble-nomics with negative returns on savings.

Financial Times
Yapping away at gold: lessons from the last days of the Rai

By Willem Buiter

November 16, 2009

Far be it from me to assert that a fate similar to that suffered by the Yapese Rai will befall gold - another intrinsically worthless fiat commodity. But the demise of the Rai as a store of value and means of payment, when taken together with the historical experience of pre-columbian native American tribes and nations that attached very little value to the shiny metal, should give the gold bugs some sleepless nights. More importantly, it ought to discourage investors who are not rich enough to survive a speculative disaster from putting too much of their savings into this frivolous store of value.

(Pre-columbian native American tribes that atttached very little value to the shiny metal Oops1 and Oops2 not to mention the Aztecs and the Mayans, who were rumoured to have existed prior to the arrival of the Europeans. Fact check please, other than watching American 'cowboy movies.'

Oh, perhaps your understanding of early American economic history pivots on the sale of Manhattan island to the Dutch by a tribe of Indians for some beads? A bit selective perhaps, and a narrow experience for a pivotal historical thesis. It may be like basing a general history of European Banking on Wall Street's recent selling worthless CDO "wampum" to the continent's commercial banks. - Jesse)

Comment 5 to this article from some fellow named 'Jesse'

"Perhaps if I phrase it this way it might be more clear.

In one philosophic sense, gold is indeed a fiat valuation, if all valuations are fiat,

nothing being essential but air to breathe, food to eat, shelter and clothing in

roughly that order. All else is discretion.

Gold, however, may be less fiat, less arbitrary a a money, a medium of exchange

and a store of value, rather than the essential itself, in an other than barter economy. Just as the Aussie dollar or the euro may be less ephemeral than the US dollar,

This is what is happening. The Bank of England made an error in selling its nation's

gold 'at the bottom' and will pay a price for this; live with it.

Oh, and try to move on please, else you may begin to resemble King Canute, sitting

on his throne at ocean's edge, ordering the incoming tide to stop its inundation.

Thank you. Mr. Buiter Apparently Does Not Like Gold

Mr. Willem Buiter’s CV Summary

Previous academic appointments in economics at Princeton University, the LSE, the University of Bristol, Yale University and Cambridge University.

Former external member of the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England (1997-2000)

Former Chief Economist and Special Counsellor to the President, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2000 - 2005)

Advisor/consultant for the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the Inter-Americal Development Bank, the OECD, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the European Commission, many national governments and central banks.

Advisor to Goldman Sachs International (2005 - present)

P.S. If Goldman Sachs is holding gold short on your advice and getting face-ripped by it (sweet) I'll let you be my Facebook BFF for life.

What is a "Nominal" Stock Market Chart Versus a "Deflated" View?

Lots of interesting questions in the email bag over the weekend.

A reader asks 'What exactly is a nominal or artificial stock market rally as you use the terms?'

Nominal is used to mean "being such in name only; so-called; putative." This is an example of a nominal, or artificial stock market rally that someone had posted over at Alphaville earlier this year. (Hat tip to Rasputin of WSB for reminding me of where I had seen these charts.)

The Zimbabwe Industrial Index



I would have preferred a logarithmic chart for this extreme view of a hyperinflation in action, because the final moonshot tends to crush the detail of the prior action by skewing the scale so high. Still on the surface that looks pretty good right? Enough to get Jimmy C. to pound some teak on the table on Mad Money?

Another way to show the detail is to deflate the nominal chart.

The 'deflated' view is when you take the index and show what its value would be in terms of some other value, in this case the US dollar.

The Zimbabwe Industrial Index Deflated by the US$



Here is an example of the SP 500 viewed from two perspectives.



"Oh this is all very well and good Jesse, but when I go to the grocery store or to the gas station or the convenience store to buy my instant Lotto tickets I pay in dollars and not gold or euros."

Yes, but when your suppliers go to buy their goods that are imported, they pay in dollars that are depreciating. You know that some prices are moving higher despite slack demand overall. This is what we call 'selective inflation.' This is how it starts.

The trick of course is to get off Bernanke's monetary hamster wheel. If you are not in the US, reducing exposure to the dollar is more straightforward. If you are a Yank, then generally you would look to add exposure to contra dollar hedges to lessen your currency risk. You might also wish to begin to secure some essentials for your future.

Having said all this, as you may recall we are dubious on the hyperinflationary and severe deflationary scenarios for the US. It seems that a severe 'stagflation' is most likely based on current policies. Obama and crew are inflating the currency, but it is selectively being applied to the FIRE and Health sectors, resulting in a very slack stimulus to overall employment and the median wage.

The worst of both worlds: Inflation and Unemployment.

This is the policy mistake made by Japan in trying to reflate a status quo that was broken beyond all sustainable repair. But what can you expect when you reappoint the same team of Timmy and Larry to key economic positions, the crew that started the mess in the 1990's under Robert Rubin?

Continuity of error you can believe in, it appears.

Long Term Gold Chart Updated (And An Addendum Showing Detail)

The character of this move of the breakout will tell us how far gold will correct when it hits an intermediate top and consolidates or corrects.

Gold is in a bull market. One never gives up all their position in a bull market. Rather, you hold it while the bull is running. If you are an aggressive 'trader' you can buy on support and sell at resistance around a stable position to improve your cost basis, taking some of your own money 'off the table' but letting your profits run.

Otherwise it is better to just hang on and enjoy the ride.



As always, in a general market crash the liquidation will also hit gold and silver, and may set up an exceptional buying opportunity. But do not count on it. Never give up your seat completely on a bull market train while it is running, because it may take an extraordinary act of will to get it back again.

Last Update November 4, 2009

Sept. 16 Addendum: Someone asked for a 'picture of Scenario 1.' Here is what it might look like. With regard to timing, I am expecting gold and the SP 500 to make some sort of a short term top together, and for SP 500 DEC futures to peak out about 1117 before they correct back down to trend support. So you can see my dilemma in trying to synchronize these two views and charts. I think a market 'crash' is off the table unless there is an event, but who can predict something like that reliably?

Money Supply and Demand, and the Monetization of Debt

The growth of the broad short term money supply remains strong for a slack economy, although not quite as robust as when there was a flight to quality out of equities and Ben did his moonshot with the Fed's balance sheet.



Demand for money? What demand? This is something new in the post World War II era.



Relative to the growth of bank credit, the growth of broad short term money as measured in MZM is outsized as the Fed intends it to be.



The limit of the Fed's ability to monetize various debt instruments already in existence is the value of the dollar relative to the purchasing power of the other major fiat currencies.



Do people realize that a monetization of the dollar is occurring? Some do.



As one might expect the velocity of money, which is the ratio of money supply to the aggregate demand for money (GNP), is very low. This is helping the Fed to keep inflation selectively low, because although there is a lot of money relative to bank credit demand, that increased money is not doing much chasing of goods. It seems to be flowing once again into financial assets, which is probably an artifact of where the money has been allocated. How many cars and meals can a wealthy person or corporation consume? They do not create consumption out of their excess, they increase their speculation and the acquisition of the means of future production.

As the velocity of money starts increasing then the Fed will have to change its stance on quantitative easing, which is really nothing more than the monetization of existing debt.