Stocks and Precious Metals Charts - Everybody Knows, But Who Could Have Seen It Coming?

"I have one other issue I'd like to throw on the table. I hesitate to do it, but let me tell you some of the issues that are involved here.  If we are dealing with psychology, then the thermometers one uses to measure it have an effect.  I was raising the question on the side with Governor Mullins of what would happen if the Treasury sold a little gold in this market.

There's an interesting question here because if the gold price broke [lower] in that context, the thermometer would not be just a measuring tool.  It would basically affect the underlying psychology. Now, we don't have the legal right to sell gold but I'm just frankly curious about what people's views are on situations of this nature because something unusual is involved in policy here.  We're not just going through the standard policy where the money supply is expanding, the economy is expanding, and the Fed tightens. This is a wholly different thing." 

Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve Minutes from May 18, 1993 

 

"We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further.  A further rise would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken down all the rest in their wake.  Therefore at any price, at any cost, the central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it.  It was very difficult to get the gold price under control but we have now succeeded.  The US Fed was very active in getting the gold price down.  So was the U.K." 

Sir Eddie George, Governor Bank of England in conversation with Nicholas J. Morrell, of Lonmin Plc, 1999

 

"The information in this report is taken from sources believed to be reliable; however, the Commodity Exchange, Inc. disclaims all liability whatsoever with regard to its accuracy or completeness.  This report is produced for information purposes only." 

Statement at the bottom of the CME Gold and Silver warehouse inventory reports

 

"On January 30, 2012 the Wall Street Journal did a hilariously bad job of reporting when its front page article stated that a 'person close to the investigation' said that as a result of chaotic trading in the week before MF Global's October 31 bankruptcy, customers' money 'vaporized.'  Money doesn't vaporize...

The habitual filching of customers' funds -- even if the funds are later replaced -- goes way beyond sloppy bookkeeping.  It goes way beyond bad judgment.  Just because MF Global got away with it for a long time before it blew up in its face doesn't mean one can call it sloppy bookkeeping and have any reasonable person believe it."

Janet Tavakoli,  MF Global:  Crime, Comedy, and Cover-Up, February 28, 2012

 

"But there is a sort of  'Ok guys, you're mad, but how are you going to stop me' mentality at the top." 

Robert Johnson, Audacious Oligarchy

 

“If you shut up truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.” 

Émile Zola

 

I just thought these statements were an interesting reminder, and a modern truth to be relearned, bluntly and plainly stated. 

Promises and commitments these days are writ on the water of the fine print, and in the laws which the corporations have paid to have written. 

Who can say where and when the next Madoff moment will appear.

Gold and silver rallied strongly overnight.

Alas, they were hit in the London and NY trading, finishing slightly lower.

The Dollar drifted sideways, managing to hold a toe over the 91 handle.

Stocks soared today, taking back much of their recent losses, but still falling short of their recent highs.

Who could see it coming?

Risk on.

Have a pleasant evening.

 

Silver Coin Premiums Continue Running Much Higher Over Spot

Silver Eagles are in the 25+% range, and bags of 90% silver coins are a little over 24%.

These charts are from goldchartsrus.com.

The prices are discovered using actual quotes from the largest internet retail sellers.

Silver: Short Term, Longer Term, In Relation to Equities and Gold

“If you shut up truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”

Émile Zola

Never buy something just because it has declined from a high.

If a principle is fundamentally sound and remains so, then there will be an inevitable reversion from any extreme high or low, back to a primary trend. 

Silver may present an outstanding opportunity. 

In the short term silver is coiling, and is deeply oversold relative to stocks.   It is even out of balance with gold.

But longer term it still remains in a bear market.

Timing and patience are everything.

Ned Naylor-Leyland Suggests Media Overhanging an Exposé of Rigging in the Silver Markets

This is an excerpt of a statement apparently made by Ned Naylor-Leyland about an article involving alleged evidence presented on silver rigging that has failed to see publication anywhere for a year.  This statement has now appeared in several public places overnight.  A quick email to Ned last night confirmed that it was his.  I have found Ned to be a serious person and highly competent analyst.

Choosing to ignore this would be a decision on my part as much as choosing to ask about it in as polite and as even handed manner one can manage.  I became loosely aware of this yesterday, but decided to take no action here until something appeared 'in print' and in more than one place.

 

William D. Cohan is a highly respected financial journalist who has recently published a book in  April of this year titled The Price of Silence: the Duke Lacrosse Scandal, the Power of the Elite, and the Corruption of our Great Universities”.   He is certainly no stranger to controversy and to telling the truth against opposition.  He is one of my favorite commentators in business journalism.

I have not personally seen the article referenced here, or any of the evidence or facts which it is said to contain.  I do not know Andrew Maguire.  I am not familiar with the particulars of this situation, not in the loop as they say.  I was aware that some whistleblowers had come forward after the CFTC hearing on silver, but was not aware of exactly who they were or what they had to say.  And I do not even know now if this is in fact the basis of this story.

I would have preferred if there had been a statement from Bill Cohan about this before this story was released.  How do we know he has not taken some serious efforts to have his article published against bureaucratic delays?  For a journalist there are legal considerations and fact checking that may not be as paramount for others who are not professional journalists.  But we have also seen these processes abused in order to delay certain stories artificially.    Since this has the appearance of an ongoing conversation it seems probable that he has had the opportunity to comment and has deferred for whatever reason.   But he certainly now ought to say something.  

Have whatever facts involved in this become Mr. Cohan's exclusive property?  If not, how can he become the presumed bottleneck for these revelations?  I can understand the slowness of processes involved in something like this,  but people are aware that other stories have been held until after important elections before by the mainstream media so as not to embarrass any political figures.  

And there are some sensitivities here since the CFTC conducted a four-five year study of price rigging in the silver market, sat on the results over the protests of commissioner Bart Chilton, and then killed the study without issuing any results. 

Despite sincere efforts by some, the regulators have managed their public awareness responsibilities somewhat awkwardly to say the least.  And this is not incidental to their mission but paramount since they are public interest representatives in a publicly funded position.  There is a general aloofness and high-handedness in this Administration that is not consistent with a healthy democratic process. 

And it is not as if market rigging is some sort of outlier that only conspiracy specialists would imagine given all the recent scandals in LIBOR, etc.  One might say that if a market can be profitably rigged this days, then it most likely is.  Former CFTC Chair Gary Gensler is alleged to have said that recently, and it makes sense.  And what the heck does that say about our current markets and their health, given that we are now six years past one of the greatest collapses of a control fraud in the financial markets and have supposedly reformed them, while spending trillions to support them?

Are the ruling elite going to retreat into silence again, and then wait until we forget about this and go away and let them do whatever they want?  Are we at the point when even asking legitimate questions has become a concern?  I should hope not, because then we would be truly lost beyond repair.

The lack of transparency in these matters is therefore a likely precipitant to speculation about what is happening, and what the facts may be, given the overly secret nature of the markets and regulation, and some of the seemingly out-of-the-norm happenings and positions. 

If any of this is being done to promote confidence, then it is surely not being done well.  The US and UK could not have eroded confidence in their markets any more than if had gone out and purposely intended to sow doubts about their integrity in the eyes of the world.

Light is a marvelous remedy for doubts, suspicions and secretiveness.   And impatience is no excuse for incivility, although one can understand how continual stonewalling can grate upon the public temperament.  Let us therefore have some light, please, and less efforts to manage and hide some of the more potentially embarrassing facts or mistaken policies of the past. 

As we have seen so often it is rarely the initial missteps that cause  the most serious problems, but the downfall always seems to be in the subsequent attempts to cover it up, and too often to save someone important some embarrassment, all in the name of 'confidence.'

Is the emperor naked?   Do we dare look?

You may read the entire piece at TFMetals here or at Bill Murphy's site here (free trial available.)

"I very much hope that pressure will now be brought to bear on William D. Cohan to publish the article that he wrote a year ago and is still sitting on; the suppression of this evidence and regulatory collusion is helping to keep this rig going. An investigative financial journalist of repute has looked at the evidence, wrote a long and scathing editorial piece about what happened (a year ago) and yet STILL we sit waiting for discovery or publication of his piece.

While nothing comes of this Precious Metals investors continue to experience real losses, something that is unacceptable to me as an observer aware of the background story. I take no pleasure in naming and shaming in this way, and am heartened that Cohan confirmed and corroborated Andy’s evidence, but now is the time for the pot to be filled and the perpetrators flushed out. If it takes intervention by a third party to set fires in order to get it out there, then so be it."

Ned Naylor-Leyland

 

 Please see:  Mr. Cohan Responds

The Anglo-American Precious Metals Derivatives Duopoly: Quarterly OCC Report

The US Office of the Currency Comptroller (OCC) issues a Quarterly Report on the Derivatives exposure of US Banks and Trust. The report, including historical archives, can be found here.

The report includes "all insured U.S. commercial banks and trust companies as well as other published financial data." So obviously it is not comprehensive of private funds, and banks without a US subsidiary presence.

The archives go back to 1998, but it is quite clear that the report is not so interesting prior to the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.

The report shows that JPM has about 80 percent of the gold derivatives in the world on its book, with HSBC holding the other 20 percent.    And in other commodities, JPM holds a similar position as well as part of their overall $78 trillion derivatives book which is heavily dominated by interest rate and credit derivatives.  But hey, that's without netting, right?  Oh yeah, counter-party risk.

JPM is not just Too Big to Fail.  It IS the market.  And 95% of their transactions are still OTC.

Just for the sake of perspective I did include a chart from the 2Q 2000 report here which shows both the total derivatives exposure, leverage and concentrations, and the gold market in particular. 

Notice that some of the players are no longer with us, and of course there is the big combination of CMB and JPM, when the houses of Morgan and Rockefeller combined after this report was issued to become the leviathan of international banking. 

At that time Chase Manhattan Bank was the biggest player with about $14 Trillion in nominal derivatives with a leverage to total assets of about 43.  The gold market was a three way split amongst Chase, Morgan and Citi, with Fleet grabbing some scraps.

This is for the derivatives gold market among commercial banks.  At that time the silver market was dominated by a non-bank, the now almost infamous AIG. 

As Ted Butler relates in December, 2003:

"Here's how AIG got to be the biggest trader in the silver market. When Drexel Burnham Lambert went bankrupt in 1989, the DBL Trading Group was purchased by AIG, and became the AIG Trading subsidiary, which currently operates out of offices in Greenwich, Conn. You may recall DBL Trading was the subsidiary involved in the temporary gold loan default with the central bank of Portugal at that time.

Before moving over to AIG, the DBL Trading Group worked at Goldman Sachs (J. Aron) in the early 1980's, and before that began at ACLI (A.C. Leon Israel). For the sake of full disclosure, and in an interesting coincidence, I worked at Drexel Burnham Lambert in Miami, for 10 years until 1986, but had no involvement, whatsoever, with DBL Trading."

I include this not only for historical interest, but also to remind you that the derivatives market is only one facet of the markets overall, albeit a growing one that is still about 95% Over The Counter and unregulated. It also still does not include the futures markets in this data.

Here is an overall chart from the June 2011 Report. One thing that immediately jumps out is that JPM now has a total nominal derivatives position of about $78 Trillion. That's a lot of nuts.

The other unmistakable point is that besides the increased concentration, the nominal leverage of Goldman Sachs at 537:1 is that of a hedge fund and not a commercial bank or trust. Even Morgan Stanley is running at a modest 26:1.

By the way,  in a bit of non-metals related gossip, I hear that Mackie Messer is strolling the downtown area, and might be looking to put a blade between the ribs of Meier Schmul with the objective of having one less investment bank in the market, in addition to the fine pickings from the collateral corpses.

Who can really know such things? Not so many as think they do perhaps. But it is good to know who and where your friends are, and with whom they are associating. Just ask Herr Fuld.  Oops, Mistah Kurtz, he dead. John Paulson?

The leviathan JPM, uber bank of Rockefeller and Morgan, holds 80% of the gold derivatives in the world, with HSBC having the rest. HSBC was founded in the British colony of Hong Kong and is now headquartered at Canary Wharf London.

At this sort of concentration you do not have a size advantage, you ARE the market, with all that it implies in terms of knowledge of positions et cetera, at least concerning derivatives. In the non-gold precious metals JPM's derivatives are a more modest 69%.

How important are derivatives to gold and the metals? Not so much, unless you consider it important to know who is hedging what positions and future supply. And it also helps to manage some of the largest non-derivatives positions such as large ETFs for example.

But some might conclude that between them the Anglo-Americans have the gold market in hand.

JPM holds quite a derivatives position in 'other commodities' as well, presumably non-precious metal. Inconsequential thinkgs like food and energy. That makes the commodities boss at JPM, Blythe Masters, Der große Macher in anyone's book.

As general rule of thumb, if you are the House in any game, you should not be able to also sit at the table as a player, internal confidentiality agreements notwithstanding. It really is just that simple.

You should be taking money on a transactional service basis and net zero exposed. And if you can't do that and make enough money, then you need a new business model.

And the notion of commingling this sort of business with insured bank deposits and Federal Reserve subsidies is insane.

Any major commodities player needs to be compact enough to wrap up in a carpet and get rolled out the door, sans bailouts, should conditions require. Even a big player like Enron or Refco.

One cannot help but wonder if some of these mega banks have not become so interwined with government as to be in a virtual partnership in their implementers of fiscal and financial policy, which is a dangerous development indeed.

"Oh the shark has pretty teeth dear,
And he bears them dripping red,
A sharp knife has Macheath dear
And when he flicks it you are dead."

Gold, and Platinum, and Money, Oh My!

Traders have recently been remarking about a highly unusual event in the metals markets.

For the first time in quite a while, the price of gold per ounce has exceed the price of platinum per ounce. This is shown in the first chart.

There is even a paired trade being touted, short gold and long platinum. The caveat is that this is said to be a profitable trade IF there is a global recovery. Personally I think one must also assume that the recovery is not due to money printing.

Platinum is largely an industrial and consumer metal, even moreso than silver. Platinum has wide industrial uses in jewelry, catalytic converters, fuel cells, and hard drives among other things. similar to copper, platinum is an indicator of industrial manufacturing activity.

The use of platinum as money a store of value has relatively little traction except among collectors. The big price drive is its very useful properties for industrial use. I am not aware that it has ever been used as a national currency except for a brief period of time in 19th century Russia.

There is some secular effect on platinum, with substitution in some applications being achieved by palladium. But the two metals are tracking one another in price, as show in the chart below. So that seems to be a minor influence.

Some are confused because of the relative rarity of platinum, which is produced in fairly small quantities each year. But to look only at supply without considering demand is a basic fallacy of pricing. There is a definite shortage of honest politicians in Washington, but the ones that are there do not seem to be commanding very high prices amongst lobbyists, for example, as demand for honesty is also relatively low.

It does serve to look at a few more items as we see in the chart comparing price performance, rather than price, in the mix of gold, the SP500, the Commodity Index, and platinum. The Commodity Index is used as a broad reference and includes much more than metals.

Clearly industrial activity would seem to be lagging, while the money components of things like gold are increasing for some reason unrelated to commodity demand. That ought not to surprise anyone following the markets. The supply of paper money is increasing beyond demand of organic growth in the real economy, while demand for commodities used in production is slumping.

I would therefore not think the gold platinum pair to be particularly useful. I would consider something else if I believed that there would be an imminent industrial recovery.

Notice that I did not include copper or silver in these charts. That is because their performance tends to crush the meaning out of the others. Silver is responding to a massive break in a long term price suppression caused by artificial shorting activity. And copper is a more speculative market than most commodities.

I also did not include crude oil because, as nine out of ten Americans will remember, it is not a metal. And it sometimes has a speculative life of its own, especially as a reaction to certain regional conflicts. However being the indulgent sort I have included it in a final chart. It is a commodity.

Massive Silver Withdrawals From The Comex

It will be interesting to see how the CFTC, the Obama Administration, and the Comex deal with this situation with silver, including the disposition of the massive paper short positions that appear to be undeliverable.

It could prove to be a watershed event, or at least an interesting scandal to observe as it unfolds.

Harvery Organ's commentary:

"And now for the big silver report.

We witnessed a massive withdrawal of silver unprecedented in the history of the comex. First there was a smallish 6507 oz of silver deposited to two customers, one being 497 oz and the other 6010 oz). But just look at the huge withdrawals:

Four customers (not dealers) withdrew a total of 1,019,310 oz from the comex vaults. This is real silver leaving from 4 registered vaults. The individual withdrawals are: 579,081, 30,380, 399,994 and 9855 oz.

The dealer (our bankers) also were involved in the withdrawal of silver to the tune of 769,941 oz (there were 2 dealers involved removing 102,866 and 667,875 ozs). When you see this massive drain of silver, the fire is raging. The total silver withdrawal by both dealer and customer totalled an astronomical 1,789,251. The Brink's trucks must have been very busy yesterday.

The comex folk notified us that an amazing 85 notices were sent down for servicing for a total of 425,000 oz of silver. The total number of silver notices sent down so far total 323 or 1,615,000 oz. To obtain what is left to be served, I take the open interest for January at 153 and subtract 85 deliveries leaving a total of 68 notices or 340,000 oz left to be serviced.

Thus the total number of silver ounces standing in this non delivery month of January is as follows:

1,615,000 oz + 340,000 = 1,955,000 oz (Thursday total = 1,625,000). As promised to you, this number is rising and will continue to rise until the end of the month as our banker cartel scrambles to get any morsel of silver to satisfy the massive demand for this metal. Our bankers are stunned to see such a huge amount of silver options in a traditionally slow month.

I hope everyone caught the Eric Sprott story on Kingworld news that he is having trouble locating silver."

SP 500 March Futures Intraday at Noon: Credibility Gaps Abounding

Here is an additional interpretation of the big inverse H&S bottom from July 2010 showing a target around 1280 that appears to have been met.

I cannot stress enough how manipulated these markets are, so use caution if you choose to play on their tables.

I was watching some individual stocks on Level II quote feeds and they were marching the prices up and down using 100 share bid/ask transactions. There was a noticeable lack serious buying at most times.

The intraday price manipulation in these markets, and particularly in silver, is becoming so blatantly obvious as to be getting almost silly. It reminds me of our little girl showing me one of her 'card tricks' when she offers me the deck with one card sticking way out and says 'pick one,' and then moves the deck around furiously if I try to pick one of the others.

I think there is a nice setup for a 'flash crash' developing with perhaps some trigger event this time that will be used as a justification for that and perhaps other things.

These fellows on Wall Street and in Washington have gotten through most of their lives by using special privilege, private influence, and simply cheating. By now dishonesty and deception is like a familiar friend that they turn to whenever the going gets tough, so how can we be surprised?

As a reminder, The Quiet Coup - Simon Johnson

“For every credibility gap there is a gullibility fill.” Richard Clopton

Bull Breakout Can Carry Silver to 37.50 With a Spike to 40

Its a bit tough to forecast this rise in silver because of the nature of the rally which is a price breakout precipitated by the collapse of a market manipulation. The large naked short positions have yet to be covered.

Few people yet understand what is happening here. Silver is being re-monetized, and the back of the silver bear cartel is being broken on a wheel of global demand, shredding their paper pyramid schemes.

If there is no panic liquidation because of a collapse in China or US equities it appears quite possible for silver to reach the 37.50 target on its fourth leg up, with a spike to 40 possible.

If there is no spike higher then a steady climb can keep going until the market clears and the bears deliver their promised bullion, made available by higher prices. What that price will be is difficult to forecast because of the lack of transparency and excess of duplicity in the market fundamentals as they are publicly disclosed.

The more I think about how these markets are managed and regulated, especially in light of the 'mystery trader' who currently holds 90% of the copper at the LBMA, approaching a 'corner on the market,' and the enormous leverage and naked shorting in the 'bullion markets,' the more ridiculous they seem to be in terms of a productive economic market function and capital allocation system.

If as stated the market participants driving these schemes are recently bailed out Too Big To Fail Banks utilizing reserve currency freshly printed by Anglo-American banking cartel, then this is an absolute discrace, even worse than the manipulation of key commodities which flourished under Enron.

JPM and HSBC Sued for Silver Market Manipulation

As I recall when Blanchard sued Barrick and JPM for manipulating the gold market one of the first motions to dismiss came from Barrick who claimed that they were acting at the behest of the government and the central banks.

I believe the law firm representing this was the one who was successful in the Sumitomo copper litigation.

Reuters
JPM and HSBC Sued for Alleged Silver Market Manipulation
By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK, Oct 27 (Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA.L) were hit with two lawsuits on Wednesday by investors who accused them of conspiring to drive down silver prices, and reaping an estimated hundreds of millions of dollars of illegal profits.

The banks, among the world's largest, were accused of manipulating the market for COMEX silver futures and options contracts from the first half of 2008 by amassing huge short positions in silver futures contracts that are designed to profit when prices fall.

"Defendants reaped hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions of dollars in profits" from the conspiracy, one of the complaints said.

The respective plaintiffs, Brian Beatty and Peter Laskaris, each said they traded COMEX silver futures and options and contracts, and lost money because of the alleged manipulation.

Beatty lives in Connecticut and Laskaris in New York, court records showed. The lawsuits seek class-action status, damages that may be tripled and other remedies. The defendant banks are major participants in the silver market.

JPMorgan declined to comment. An HSBC spokeswoman had no immediate comment.

The lawsuits were filed one day after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission proposed regulations to give it greater power to thwart traders who try to manipulate prices.

The CFTC began probing allegations of silver price manipulation in September 2008.

"Going back to the early 1980s, silver has been an extremely volatile market," said Bill O'Neill, managing partner at Logic Advisors, an Upper Saddle River, New Jersey investment firm specializing in commodities. "I often describe it as a speculative playground. You have to be a big boy to play."

FRAUD, DEVIOUSNESS ALLEGED

Only once in its 36-year history has the CFTC successfully concluded a manipulation prosecution, in a 1998 proceeding concerning prices for electricity futures.

Speaking on Tuesday, Chairman Gary Gensler said the proposed regulations would give the regulator greater power to police "fraud-based manipulation."

Commissioner Bart Chilton added that there had been "fraudulent efforts to persuade and deviously control" silver prices.

A CFTC spokesman said the regulator does not comment on investigations, and would not discuss the investor lawsuits.

Earlier this year, the CFTC began looking into allegations by a London trader that JPMorgan was involved in manipulative silver trading, the Wall Street Journal said on Wednesday, citing a person close to the situation.

Silver prices have faced regulatory scrutiny in the past, perhaps most prominently after the Hunt brothers in Texas in 1980 attempted to corner the market, driving prices above $50 an ounce. The price later plunged.

Since the CFTC began its probe, spot silver prices XAG= have ranged between $8.42 and $24.90 an ounce, Reuters data show. They traded Wednesday at roughly $23.53. Silver futures prices SIc1 are up 39.1 percent this year.

CFTC Commissioner Raises Alarm Over Silver Market Manipulation

The manipulation in the silver market with two or three banks holding enormous undeliverable short positions was obvious, for years.

The CFTC was complicit in turning a blind eye to this, stonewalling and whitewashing the corruption, as were many market commentators and participants. Ted Butler and GATA did a wonderful job of highlighting this enormous fraud but were ignored and even vilified for the past twelve years in the same vein as whistle blower Harry Markopolos was in raising concerns about Madoff's investment scheme.

Bart Chilton is speaking out as he said a few weeks ago he would if the CFTC was not making progress in correct this travesty. This is the sort of reform that the people were seeking when they swept the Democrats into office, a reform which they never received.

This obviously should be investigated by an independent body, given the regulatory capture held by the banks who manipulated the market to the detriment of the world in suppressing prices and creating an artificial shortage that will be painful to unwind.

This is not a partisan issue, but involves politicians of both parties going back twenty years or more, in both London and New York. And the corruption is pervasive and ongoing in multiple US finanical and commodity markets.  The regulators and ratings agencies have not been doing their jobs.

Some will attempt to dismiss what Mr. Chilton is saying here as inconclusive. Keep in mind that he is a high profile CFTC official, and what he says comes through a 50,000 watt megaphone, so he must choose his words with great care. But this is almost unprecedented for an official to speak out against his own administration.

The response to these sorts of revelations seem to be a blanket of media silence and whispered character assassination, which is the mark in trade of those who have no sense of duty, honor, and country. Their crime is betrayal of the public trust, and the public's fault is apathetic complicity.  'Silver did not rally on the news, it must not be significant. I did not hear about this on television, so it must not be true.'

But the dominos are starting to fall, and more revelations are to come. 

CFTC's Chilton raises alarm about silver market
WASHINGTON
Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:30am EDT

Oct 26 (Reuters) - There have been repeated attempts to influence prices in silver markets, Bart Chilton, a commissioner at the U.S. futures regulator, said on Tuesday.

"There have been fraudulent efforts to persuade and deviously control that price," Chilton said in prepared remarks before a Commodity Futures Trading Commission meeting.

Chilton said he could not pre-judge the outcome of the CFTC's ongoing investigation of the silver markets, but said public deserves some answers to their concerns.

Gold and silver are no bubbles. It is a reverse Ponzi scheme that goes back for decades, that has sold many more ounces of metal than can possibly be delivered at today's artificially low prices, that was tolerated and even promoted by those who were running a monetary control fraud, quite probably the greatest in history. The banks and insiders are trapped and desperate, trying to bluff and buy themselves out of another fraud yet again. They will never give up, but will have to be rooted out. It is unlikely that reform can come from within, since the righteous anger of the people and the will to change will be co-opted by those very forces that have manipulated the system and perpetrated the fraud.

Fortunes will be made and lost, and careers ruined, as the revelations of manipulation and corruption are made over the next ten years. And this will make for dangerous times, as an empire of deceit collapses not at once, but in stages. There will be new threats and more bailouts for the banks to be paid by 'austerity' for the common person who is caught up in their own web of petty diversions, apathetic cynicism and denial. There is little better example of this than Britain but America is not far behind.

But the tide has turned and change is in the wind.

Banks short 20,000 tonnes of gold.

Embry: Commercial Signal Failure in the Metals May Be Imminent

"A single breaker may recede; but the tide is evidently coming in."
Thomas B. Macaulay

Why the Official Antipathy to Gold and Silver? The Second Oldest Profession

Every so often someone asks, 'Why do the government and the banks manipulate the price of gold and silver?'

There is a great deal of circumstantial evidence to support this, even some blatant quotes pertinent to the topic from the likes of Volcker, Greenspan, and Bank of England governor Eddie George. Of course it can all be denied. People can deny anything, even well known historical events with many witnesses, if it suits their bias and purposes.

But putting aside the operational aspects, what is the motive?

Most recently a correspondent from India asked the question 'why do the banks wish to control silver from the short side? Why would they not blow it into a bubble like they do with stocks and make their profit there? Why do the banks wish to hold these prices down and make people think badly of silver and gold which we here value so much?'

When asked this, I will usually attempt some explanation that begins with the fact that the banks involved are the Primary Dealers for the most part, and very involved with the Federal Reserve and the government on a variety of levels in the issuance and arbitrage of official US debt.

The motive therefore involves aspects from an 'official' monetary perspective. It will often include a reference to Gibson's Paradox, a paper by Larry Summers involving the price of gold and its perceptual relationship with the long end of the curve. It might include Volcker's and Greenspan's comments about the price of gold casting a negative light on the stability of the currency if it rises too high or too quickly. I may even get into the Second Bank of the United States, and Andrew Jackson's populist role in exposing its frauds, and refusing to renew its Charter in favor of constitutional money.

But if I am ever asked about this in the future, I can think of no better, no more concise statement of a possible motive for the manipulation of gold and silver than this:

“The central economic problem plaguing this country since 1913 has been the presence of the Federal Reserve System. Without the Federal Reserve System’s debt-currency scheme having effectively supplanted the constitutional monetary system based upon silver and gold, it would have been impossible - not simply improbable, or difficult, but impossible - for politicians in the public sector and speculators in the private sector to have amassed the staggering level of unpayable, unconstitutional, and unconscionable debt that now bears down upon this country.”

Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Going to the Roots of the Problem

It's enabling the fraud, always and everywhere, and the power obtained in controlling the supply and issuance of money.  There are those who are involved in productive labor, and those who wish to unproductively tax it. It is an old story with deep roots in history.

And once again, the government and the financiers seem to have formed an unholy alliance to harness the real economy with excessive, unjust, and unproductive taxes for the private benefit of a privileged few, protecting and promoting their schemes when they win, and covering and subsidizing their losses when they do not. In either case the money is coming out of the real economy, and like a paraiste is starving it of its vitality.

So there is your motive, from what might be called the second oldest profession. Find out what people need to have, and then seek to control it to obtain your wealth by exacting a tax on it, but without having to deliver anything for it, a mere exploitation of informational and procedural advantage.

There is a difference between amassing capital, building a business, and assuming the risks for its success and failure, and this modern form of banking which is nothing more than an enormous tax on the productive economy granted by a corrupted government that turns a blind eye to fraud and abuses. And when its schemes go wrong, it obtains subsidies and relief from its partners in government.

As Andrew Jackson noted of the Second Bank of the United States, the predecessor to the Fed which came back into being 80 years after:

"Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out."

Butler: JP Morgan "Covering Its Silver Shorts Like Crazy"

JP Morgan holds a massive short position in silver, some of which it is said to have inherited as a concentrated speculative position from Bear Stearns. Retreats from such overextended positions are never easy, and therefore never straightforward. Having such a position can be very profitable in the short term since it gives one remarkable control over the paper price of a commodity, paricularly if the regulators are willing to turn a blind eye to certain trading practices.

If it is indeed reducing its oversized short positions, JP Morgan will undoubtedly attempt to 'smack the price' on occasion even as it covers, to prevent the specs and hedge funds from taking too much leash to the long side. This will help to prevent them from provoking a disorderly rout and, God forbid, a 'short squeeze.' In these managed markets, the major players tend to respect each other's turf, so one has to wonder who might take them on.

The 'deadline' if any that they might face is prospective position limits to be imposed and more transparent reporting required by the CFTC. Given the past history, it is most likely that JPM will not be overly inconvenienced by them in the short term. Ted has always been the optimist with regard to regulatory reform and willingness to 'do the right thing.' I also believe this will happen, but slowly. Still, it does seem as though the darkest hour is always before the dawn, and the last few weeks have been disheartening for the metals bulls, as demonstrated in the sentiment indicators.

Let's see what happens in the market and take our cues from that.

"JP Morgan Chase, the big short in the silver market, is "covering like crazy," silver market analyst Ted Butler remarks in his weekly interview with Eric King of King World News.

Butler thinks that both silver and gold turned around this week and he wonders whether, in light of the new financial regulation law, MorganChase will ever come back to shorting silver so much.

Butler also is very encouraged by the comments of Commissioner Bart Chilton of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the promise of position limits in the precious metals markets." Chris Powell, GATA

You can listen to the interview with metals analyst Ted Butler at the King World News Internet site here.

Why the BIS Gold Swaps Are Important and the Failure to Reform

In his recent commentary, Gold Derivatives Update: BIS Swaps, Reg Howe notes:

"Not surprisingly, revelation of these swaps has generated considerable discussion, comment and analysis by students of the gold market. What appears to have happened is that one or more central banks loaned gold to one or more bullion banks, which then swapped the gold with the BIS for cash, leaving the physical metal in place. Under this arrangement, the accounting conventions promulgated by the International Monetary Fund allow the central bank or banks to continue to count the gold in official reserves while the BIS enjoys a high level of security on the gold side of the swap."

This is how I described the swaps in a July 6 blog entry:

"Some parties have mistakenly asserted that since a swap is not a lease for accounting purposes, which is quite correct, then the gold could not have been sold. That is just a simplistic misconception. A swap transfers the benefits of the assets from one party to another for a period of time in exchange for interest paid, generally on forex received. Its does not sell the property but it transfers the mineral rights for a time, if you will.

The party that then holds that gold asset can just hold it, or they can utilize it in some way, such as leasing it out for a period of time to another party, like a bullion bank, who can subsequently sell it. These types of 'three way deals' were very commonly seen when Lehman and Bear Stearns started to unravel and they needed to be unwound, and were a key component of the whole issue of hidden counter party risks. Remember that?

So on the books of the first party there are in fact no leases or sales shown, just swaps of varying duration and terms. But the swap has delivered an asset, in this case gold, into the hands of a party who may have no qualms about leasing that asset out to a third party to obtain funds, and that third party is likely to sell it. I would of course agree that this does not PROVE anything. How can it when the books of some of the parties are still opaque, and audits rarely conducted to verify ownership. But after what we have just seen over the last three years in these games of asset merry-go-round, how can anyone just blatantly dismiss that can and likely is happening, where there is an easy profit to be made. Especially considering the past history of transactions between the bullion banks and the central banks.

Personally I would view this report as bullish for the price of gold, since it is past history, and almost certainly an indication of concerns about Comex offtake. In other words, shortages are appearing, and fresh sources of bullion are becoming increasingly difficult to find."

Quite a few of the usual suspects and industry bottom feeders have questioned the significance of these swaps, while admitting they do not understand them. So confusing, who would care. Move on, nothing to see here. By the way, strike those nutters off the guest interview lists, and make sure people know that they are persona non grata.

The significance of these swaps seems almost transparently obvious to anyone who is following the commodity markets, but Reg Howe says it quite well, and has been illuminating this smarmy little scheme for several years.

"...an integral part of gold banking in recent years has been the suppression of gold prices, not least by increasing the ratio of paper claims on gold to the underlying amount of available real metal. In this sense, if the new gold swaps disclosed by the BIS are just the latest technique for giving official support to an increasingly shaky gold banking business, they might be viewed as a short-term negative for gold prices. But in a larger sense, the growing reluctance of central banks to part with whatever gold they have left can only be a positive development for committed gold investors."

The point is that some of the central banks, led by the example of the Fed and J.P. Morgan, have been leasing out their gold inventories to the bullion banks at very low rates, without reflecting those leases on their books. Technically this does not violate any prohibitions against selling sovereign assets without the oversight and consent of the people. In the case of Gordon Brown, when you do it, you invoke the secrets act and hide the details as well.

The bullion banks have been selling that bullion into the market, artificially suppressing the price, and occasionally having to be bailed out when there is a short term 'run' on their paper obligations as in the case of the sale of England's gold by Gordon Brown.

The reason, more properly rationale, for this 'arrangement' is the linkage shown in several economic papers, including an important one co-authored by Larry Summers, that leads them to believe that their is a linkage between lower gold prices and lower interest rates on the long end of the curve. I believe they have it wrong and are ultimately mistaken, but they believe it, and that's what counts. And this will be their cover story when they are brought to justice, the Greenspan defense for his own unindicted offenses. I thought I was doing the right thing, but I was mistaken, and I am sorry.

So why should we care? For two reasons. First, this is clearly become a reverse Ponzi scheme, wherein large paper claims exist for a shrinking pool of an available physical resource, ie. central bank and bullion bank gold. The same applies for silver.

The derivatives short positions held by a few banks, like JPM and HSBC, are enormous. If the market ever breaks free of this scheme by the shorts, it is going to leave a crater in the international banking system.

And second, when one has a scheme started from good intentions that gets out of hands and is covered up by official government actions, it festers into corruption. That corruption spreads, and undermines the integrity of the institutions that it involves, namely the Treasuries and Central Banks of many of the developed countries.

"Corruption is a tree, whose branches are
of an immeasurable length: they spread
Everywhere; and the dew that drops from thence
Hath infected some chairs and stools of authority."

Beaumont and Fletcher, The Honest Man's Fortune

Sounds a little crazy huh? The SEC dismissed the whisteblower in the Madoff scandal as a cranks for years.

At least some of the monied interests, the privileged, and their demimonde of enablers have called it such. And yet the evidence keeps coming out and confirming it, little by little. The revelation of the fractional reserve nature of the world's largest bullion exchange was a blockbuster. The Fed resists audits of their dealings in gold, and an independent audit of the gold held by the Treasury and Fed with a full and clear disclosure of any obligations on those inventories has been resisted for years.

Like Enron, the tech bubble, the housing bubble, the Madoff Ponzi scheme, financial deregulation, OTC derivatives, relaxed pension fund rules, and the financial assets bubble, this bullion bank scheme is going to blow up and collapse, and the public is going to be asked to pay the bill, and ignore all the wrongdoing for their own good.

That is why this is important. And there will be hell to pay when the day of reckoning arrives. And that is why there is such moral hazard in the policy of not seeking indictments of key figures in this financial fraud because the perpetrators think they will be able to just keep the scheme going, and then lie and deny if the time of discovery comes, as their fellows have done already.

But it hasn't happened yet. And the pigmen live life on the edge, doing what they will, with a confidence that they can talk their way out of any difficulties that may arise, maybe make a few phone calls, call in some favors from the powerful. They are just that good.

I have known several of that type personally. This is how they think, and their actions follow their beliefs in their own power, and the distance they enjoy from common humanity. This is why deterrence is an even more important factor in intellectual or white collar crimes, because belief in the con is such a pivotal element.

This is what makes Obama's reluctance to take an aggressive stand against fraud, to follow through on the will of the people in their desire for justice, such a fatal flaw. His moral ambiguities and desire to go along respectfully with the desires of the powerful, shown clearly in his appointments and key decisions, makes him a nice guy to pal around with perhaps, but a tragic failure as a leader for reform, and an American president.

And they often have a good run of it. But eventually they have trouble talking their way out of trouble, especially when they are figuratively swinging from a lamp post, or hoist with their own petard.

"Watch therefore and pray always, that you may escape all these things that will come to pass, and be among those standing with the Son of Man.” Luke 21:36